Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Which is weird, as she wrote for GL years ago..granted it was mostly under Ryder, but she was there acting when the show was solid. 

 

Lord, Maeve/Fletcher was dull as hell (well, poor Maeve was ) It was JFP/Anderson who put them together, and I think it was JFP, but definitely Anderson who married them off. Saddling Holly with a socially relevant storyline with dull Fletcher (and Hammer walking all over MG's lines) was the final stab and really, Holly never recovered from it. I still think the first Brent victim should have been Fletcher, with Roger being framed by Brent. You could have still had Lucy in it but not the centerpiece and have an increasingly whacked out Holly going after Roger...they should always have been in each other's orbits..just not "together" Brent could have been a great new villain but JFP wanted to sell the Lucy character so she tried to get the audiences sympathy for her with the rape.

 

I know Rauch took all the credit for crazy Annie, but Megan laid the groundwork with her starting the lies (covering up her marriage to Rick) and her odd hyperness around the kids, along with the addiction issues. It was clear they were heading that way, but may have allowed the character to not quite go into full cartoon psycho mode so Jeva looked saintly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Doesn't everyone have a kind of universal hatred of that tired old stunt?

1. This is stupid.

2. People don't think this way. Once a fan of someone like MG, always a fan. And, that goes double for the character of Holly. What the frack! Everyone, all of us, get older. Fact of life. Fans aren't stupid.

Evil McT was both stupid & she thought everyone else was, also. 

If anyone ever underestimated audience, she did.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always thought MG's Holly was a hell of a lot sexier then Kimmer's post resurrection Reva..MG was one of the only women to created sparks with RR's Alan in one single scene and of course, they didn't follow up on it. 

Its too bad..if they had pursued the Roger ALS storyline, and brought a suitable Ed back, the two of them could have been dealing with Roger and once his storyline is finished for the characters and the audience, the two of them could have gotten together. Holly as the sexy sarcastic matriarch of the show after all that has gone on.."Please Blake, even Bert would have been left speachless with your behavior."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love it!!! Truly one of the sexiest women on soaps. There's this story, it's true, about her & Jan Morgan when they got together. Maureen was  in a state, she'd had this repetitive pattern, she'd be with a man, they'd break up, she'd be with a woman, they'd break up, rinse & repeat, they are at this party, standing around talking like a cocktail party & when Maureen finally stops complaining for a minute, Jan says,

Really? I've always thought you were perfect just the way you are, for anyone, even me. 

Well, Maureen melted into a puddle. When she recovered her senses, I think the ladies began to dance & talk & laugh & the evening progressed just as you imagine it doing & they were together for about 20 years. 

Isn't that a lovely story? Especially since it's true. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still believe Megan McTavish only took the GL gig, because she was pissed about getting fired from AMC, and wanted to prove to everyone that she didn't need Felicia Minei Behr or Agnes Nixon to make her [!@#$%^&*] look good.

All in all, she was like Pat Falken Smith, but without her talent, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually think AMC and GL are cut from the same cloth in many ways. I don't think they're that dissimilar in their sort of purehearted Americana texture. I can see why someone thought she'd be a good choice. The problem, as noted above, is that Megan was backstopped at AMC by many talented creatives who filtered her worst impulses and problem writing. Not so at GL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. JFP blew up the whole writing team that was in place before..so we just had Anderson and whomever...and Liabson seemed at a loss and didn't understand GL..which was odd as he worked on ATWT when Marland was there. I remember him being at a fan event and taking some people aside and asking them for input (he might have been yanking their cranks or he might have seen the axe hovering...)

I wonder what it could have been like if someone with talent was their to reign her in..Brent/Marion was creative..she brought back Nola (and dropped the ball) she brought back Amanda (and dropped the ball) 

Odd thing is, I would have loved to know what the hell she was doing with Zachary the angel...Was he reincarnated...would he become human with his great love of MancrazedChelle? I didn't care about watching it, I just would love to see what she planned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another reason Megan dissed Conforti in her book: he was on GL staff when she was HW there and he and Miller replaced her as co heads for five months while they waited for Brown/Esensten to finish up The City.  Megan never discusses in her book that fact. I wonder how she and Conforti got along in the GL writers' room. He probably saw the handwriting on the wall with her stories.  Zach, Brent/Marion were not GL. But she couldn't come up with a plot for Amanda or Nola out of the gate, only her James E Reilly crap National Enquirer stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get the Brent storyline...the ratings had dropped so bad and the canvas was fractured as it became "Guiding Buzz" and they felt they had to beat a drum loudly as a columnist said..but how easy would it be to write for Amanda returning home after all these years, and realizing her father invited her back as weapon against Alex and AM and her choosing her own way (and instead of chasing Ross, they could have naturally been drawn back together working on something) and Nola wanting to fill her sister's shoes by trying to Mother Chele, Bridget and even Dinah (they could have written that Dinah spent time with Nola in Europe and that Nola encourgaged her "change of character")  then Nola finds out about Ed and Lillian and the [!@#$%^&*] hits the fan! It wouldn't be hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Coming over here from the AMC thread as I see the McTavish book is being discussed, and I have to ask GL fans:  Was the Brent/Marion storyline well-received by GL fans?  Did critics like it?  I saw the actor was nominated for an Emmy.  I read about it in her book, and I was intrigued so I then did some quick YouTube searches for videos to see how it played out and it looked extremely interesting and ahead of its time in the 90s (kind of).  I would have totally watched that live if I knew about it, but for some reason it was never on my radar back then

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I watched it live and was turned off but I had been spoiled because I loved, loved, loved the Curlee/Demorest era and even some of Long's material. I knew McTavish would be a disaster. No one cared about Brent/Marian especially killing off Nadine. There were brief, and I mean brief moments where some episodes had a Marland or Long flavor but it never lasted.  She was a complete disaster on GL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I do think the Brent/Marian story garnered some interest. The ratings went up - the show was very close to being canceled up to that point - and Frank Beaty was widely praised. I thought the story was very compelling to watch on a day-to-day basis. Ugly, and yes, a ripoff of various films, but entertaining. I hated that they killed Nadine but I was still watching and enjoying the story. I think the inherent ugliness of the plot and the one-note treatment given to the "good" characters was masked by the pacing and the drive and by Beaty. And Rick Heart and Sonia Satra did well, even though I never cared for Lucy. I knew they were making us feel sorry for Lucy, but in this case, it worked, as she was put through hell, instead of just endless "poor Lucy has a crush on Alan Michael," stuff.

The woman who played Susan, Nick's girlfriend, also did very well with a thankless part. I imagine someone at the show might have agreed because I was pretty sure they had planned for her to be killed by Brent but she survived and then just left with Nick (Vincent was fired, right?). 

I do wonder what would have been if they had tried to keep Brent on the show, as they seemed to be planning before Frank Beaty's breakdown made it impossible. I can't see it working, but it still would have been better than the other stories on display.

That was the biggest problem - there was absolutely nothing else to care about, maybe other than Annie's spiral into pill addiction. You had "A. Spaulding" and "Save Fifth Street," and the incredibly grotesque Lonitrat stuff with Roger/Dinah/Hart.

I tend to agree. Nixon did come from P&G soaps, and GL was the P&G soap of all P&G soaps. 

The writing team in general at GL had so much upheaval and there was no one of value running P&G at that time. 

Maybe McTavish and MADD could have worked better together, but then MADD pissed all over any viewer goodwill almost immediately. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

IIRC, much of the soap press was too busy praising Beaty's performance and McTavish's audacity in telling such a story to see what was really going on.

Personally, though, I thought the Brent/Marian storyline was transphobic - before the word even existed, I guess - and not at all the kind of story that should have been on GL (or anywhere else on daytime, for that matter).  As awful as stories like the Dreaming Death or Infinity had been for a lot of GL fans, even those tales couldn't have been as offensive as having a psychotic rapist going around Springfield dressed as Jill Farren Phelps and murdering people just to keep terrorizing his victim.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy