Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Herrera, in particular, had the very Herculean task of making a two-dimensional villain with no redeeming qualities appealing to the audience.  It wasn't an easy task, but by God, he did it (for the most part, I could've done without all the returns after 1989).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I'm actually surprised how brutish he comes off in these mid-'80s episodes during his Marland return. I am used to an older, somewhat quieter James, but here he is very quick to anger and put his hands on people whenever the mask slips. You don't see that much in soap archvillains of his ilk - you really think 'this dude could hurt me.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We happen to agree! Not Marina. Loved Dollar. Bruno no go.

Yeah., of his list, I gladly accept Zas's Roger, Chris Bernau's Alan although I submit that he was not of these others calibre. Anthony's Stenbeck but I'd have to draw the line there. It's not exactly a problem about Victor, but as much as I like him, EB isn't cutting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

It seems like, when Anthony Herrera first joins the WT cast, way the hell back in 1980, the Dobsons (or whoever was writing at that point) make SOME effort, however half-hearted, to paint James Stenbeck as multi-layered and complicated.  James is never entirely trustworthy, yet he appears very sincere in his efforts to reconnect with Barbara and Paul. 

Once James hooks up with Margaret Colin's Margo, however, and starts using his wife's business, Fashions, Ltd., as a front for his drug-smuggling operations, any pretense of James being misunderstood flies out the old window, lol; so that, after a certain point, if he isn't busy driving Barbara crazy so he can have custody of their son, or attempting once more to kill Gunnar St. Clair and get his hands on the blasted Stenbeck fortune, he's mixing it up with glorified gun molls like Ariel Aldrin and Karen Haines, or engaging in weird, "Spy vs. Spy"-esque antics with fellow ne'er-do-well John Dixon - who, IMO, is being written with less nuance than in the past and really doesn't become an actual character again 'til Marland - that I'm sure left ATWT's longtime fans wondering just WTF was going on.

That's why I loved the material that Douglas Marland wrote for him and felt it all was a proper end to that character.  To put it simple, Marland got it: there's nothing romantic or mysterious or tragic about James Stenbeck.  He's just a thug with a better resume.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which makes his constant battling with John Dixon especially problematic - because, again, you've got villain vs. villain, and who am I supposed to be rooting for again, lol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Another tough one, lol! 

Actually, Alan and Roger had more in common than either ever would have admitted.  Both were products of dysfunctional families; both had a thing for women who were either young and/or impressionable, or were conflicted over their carnal desires (hi, Rita!); and both felt a strong need to "prove themselves" to everyone, but especially to their fathers, who had looming presences in their respective lives.

Of course, AFAIK, Alan never raped anyone, so I guess he wins, lol?

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I couldn't stand Bruno...Wheeler had a habit of hiring these sweet young things like Bruno, the woman who is on BTG's now (lets hope she got better) and the Lizzie actress (who I thought was good but totally miscast as Lizzie...who should have beena  bit more intense and darker) Bruno was so damn sweet that it made my teeth hurt, plus, we didnt need another Cooper on screen.

I liked her as Dollar gave her a sarcastic teen vibe, and the good ole, blue collar girl trying to get ahead (I wanted a scene where she finds the N.R. loves K.N. carve in the wall in Nola's bedroom..."It looks like the girl who lived her wanted to get out too") but then Bruno made her this sweet young thing who vied with Harley in giving all the men in town the hots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mandy Bruno's Marina was ultimately cloying and boring. Occasionally she'd have moments of being vaguely compelling in dire circumstances, but she was just not ready to be a major lead. Predictably, genial and vaguely saintly mediocrity never deterred Ellen Wheeler (case in point: Jessica Leccia) so of course Bruno continued to star on the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

James is so interesting as a villain..he came on under the Dobsons as this fantasy prince until he was unmasked for what he was, but even having the affair with Margo didnt put him into the cartoon super villain hold...it was when the Dobs were fired first and the strike hit and they made James run over John, (which is stupid, he wouldve jsut dumped Margo if John was a pain) and then the stupid drug ring. When the Dobsons came back they doubled down on him being a cartoon villain and the dye was cast.

When Marland first brought him back he was more brutish and a bit scary, and you can see why Lucinda had a sick hots for him. I loved the scene where James is in the Hughes kitchen and he tells Paul, "Son I want you to have these values" as tries to b.s. his way back into good graces...but he has a hold on Paul's neck as he does it and Nancy gives him the side eye that she is not buying it.  Later runs dumped that (even as he ordered murders) which was too bad, Herrar hit his stride as this brutal guy who had a veneer of aristocracy to him. (which made sense James was raised as a Stenbeck but was really a  bad seed changeling.) 

If they insisted on bringing him back, each time he should have been more and more insane..where you could see his mental deterioration each time..instead of the cartoon villain who never changes.

Roger is anther character that went thorugh so many changes..but for the better until McTrash tried to revert him to being just a sociopath. John, was never a villain..he was a very complicated, selfish, but loving guy who always felt the victim against the "Hughes/Steward axis " as he said before.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still don't get the whole thing where they brought him back in the late '90s claiming he and Lucinda somehow knew each other before when they'd met onscreen IIRC and she was snowed by him. But that is way OT for this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't you just love how the P&G soaps would occasionally treat their audiences as if we were morons, lol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • Nope, it was not just you, I had the same issues. Most either disagreed with me, or just ignored my comments. But, I most definitely would have liked for them to take another route, even to add sheer variety in the storytelling. It is what it is, the story is a hit with the fans...
    • You may be a casual watcher, but you got SO much right.
    • I've been eagerly awaiting Kate's first episode under the new writers, and I wasn't disappointed. I started reminiscing about all of Kate's misdeeds when she said how good of a liar she was and how she saw right through Roman's lying. I really buy this matured, but still wise Kate in 2025, and the fact that you know under the right circumstances, the more ruthless side is always there, under the surface. Hopefully, with Roman about to confess, we get the full truth about just what the hell happened with Johnny the night EJ was shot, then all the major suspects will be eliminated, just for the writers to throw in that wrench that's waiting for it's time to shine. Everytime Brady thaws even a little bit towards Kristen I immediately get concerned. I was entertained by their fight, and it was smart to mention Kirsten having no friends, let alone positive female relationships except for Lani in regards to why Rachel is such a loser. As a viewer, do you think Stacy Haiduk as Kristen was at all thinking about her former friendships with Jennifer and Billie in that moment? I wonder if she's even aware that they were, or who Billie even is. Anyway, I do wish Kristen could have also thrown in Brady's face that he's literally the biggest slut in Salem. Rachel seeing and possibly hearing about him going from woman to woman would also negatively affect Rachel's negative ideals about women, and possibly her own self-hatred. I thought Doug's favourite class being English lit was a good through line from how impressed he was with grandpa Doug's poetry book to Julie. Hearing he dropped out because no one at home cared just made me yearn for more information about Charles LeClair as a father and person. Maybe it was this time that Robert LeClair was dying so Charles was distracted and it all fell apart after that? Alex with Kristen today is the most interesting I've seen him written. He was smarmy and cold and for a quick second looked like he was enjoying playing with Kristen clearly throwing herself at him, but when she dropped her facade he became merciful, but still unwilling to budge. He would have fit in well in the more complex 70s era as a cad with a heart underneath his bravado. However, and I can't stress this enough, I absolutely despise whenever he calls Philip, 'Phil.' It just itches my brain in all the wrong ways.
    • U.S. soaps don't use calendar years. Nor do they use their debut anniversary as season markers anymore, athough they may have done so at one time long long ago. Although GH first debuted in April, Y&R and B&B in March, and Days in November, their current seasons are considered to be starting each autumn. Edit insert to clarify: the soaps still each celebrate their debut anniversary date as an anniversary, but it's not the season end/start marker anymore. --- Soap seasons on the US broadcast networks and Peacock are currently considered to start in late August, in September, or in early October. (the autumn). Tamara Tunie said on her IG today that the current season of BTG ends at the end of August.  Then Season Two begins. https://www.instagram.com/p/DJkCcNQRxBR/ So basically, for any new soap starting from now on, Season One is a partial year that ends in the autumn, and then all following seasons go twelve months starting each autumn. Edit to add: You would think that Y&R and B&B would start their seasons on the exact same day each autumn, but due to lots of news events in the past few years, B&B has had more full preemptions than Y&R, which has thrown off their season start/end dates.  So as a result, Y&R and B&B sometimes debut their new seasons in different weeks each autumn.
    • The biggest project in my professional life is on the horizon. Feeling blessed and excited. Creative energies are dominating my whole being.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is what happens when you write for character over actor.
    • I assume Holly is Nicole's kid, right?  If so, the casting on the actress was spot on since she totally had some of Nicole's mannerisms/aura. Kristen is being shown as human again.. which we haven't seen from the character since Eileen's 1 year return back in the early 2010s. Kate is now running the Brady Pub?  
    • I think most people's knowledge of DNA tests comes from Maury. I dont think she nor most people would even think to consider genetic markers
    • Calendar year, at least going by when the Season Numbers have changed in the past several years on GH and on DAYS it's been calendar years. What their start dates are though haven't necessarily made inherent sense to me.  Hmm, interesting point. I'm used to being for underdogs, as well, but I am very invested in the Duprees. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy