Jump to content

Y&R: Episode Discussion for the week of August 10


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I agree with much of what you said, but I don't agree that no true fan only cares about the Chancellors, Newmans and Abbotts. Should they get heavy play? Yes, but that doesn't mean any character connected to one of the core families all of a sudden should take priority over long term vets who Bill Bell created and wrote for also. Bill Bell wrote for his core families, but he also valued other characters that were not part of these families.

Frankly, I never liked Adam. Do I think he is being wasted and could have been written better? Yes, but I don't find it devastating that Adam may be written out. In fact, I hope he is. As for Lily, why is she so important according to your standards? She is not a Newman, Abbott or Chancellor. And as long as she is played by a mere average actress, I will not be automatically connected to her or her story because she is Neil and Dru's daughter. Just like Colleen. I don't want her to be killed off, but I don't vlaue her more than I do Lauren because she is an Abbott. As for Billy, the show survived without him just fine. I think it was important to bring him back, but I am sick of seeing him shoved into so many stories. This character just returned last September and now he is the star of the show, even overshadowing Jack.

That is my biggest problem with these writers. Except for a few protected characters, the beloved vets are being moved out by younger characters. Billy is now the center of his family rather than Jack, Jill will surely be overshadowed by her sons and grandson, Victor is being made to look like a fool and outwitted by his pyschotic son, Nikki became wall paper up until last week, while Nick was on five days a week. Neil is around to prop Lily or her story. Kevin and Jana have all but replaced Michael and Lauren as the center of their family. People keep claiming that soaps only have a few years, so why alienate even more of your loyal audience by replacing their favorites. Yes, a show should be multigenerational, but too much focus is on younger, less interesting characters and actors. Why did so many like last Friday's episode? It wan't because Sharon stole something else again. It was because we were invested in the Paul, Nikki and Victor scenes. Even with little buildup prior we were invested again because we know these characters and we cared what was happening to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 224
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

So we should just accept a badly written show?

Replacement writers is a risk many of us are willing to take, because the show is incredibly bad right now and the honeymoon period for this current writing regime ended months ago, and things don't appear to be improving. And I doubt they ever will, given many things I've observed about this writing regime from the start.

As others have said, they find the show to be in much wore shape now than its ever been, hence why many on this board are quitting it.

As I've always said, there's been several long-term problematic tendencies of this writing regime that I've seen since the beginning, and they've only gotten worse with time. Not to mention, how morbid this show has become, and who do we blame for that? I blame this writing regime, it's their style and many of the writers on this head writing team have reeked similar havoc on other shows.

Maria Arena Bell, Hogan Sheffer, and Scott Hamner do not understand this show. They haven't from day one and they tried to mask it with the Kay/Marge story, which became a mess by the end anyway. Sheffer and Hamner have destroyed other shows with their vision, and Maria lacks storytelling experience and motivation. You have three very different people with problematic reputations running this show, and running it into the ground.

They think they're writing some type of anti-soap with the fact pacing, skipping over of important beats, morbid stories, and the borderline incest. What the hell is this? Who told them to do two sexual assaults in two weeks? Who told them to kill a dog? Who told them to have a psycho intentionally put a young girl in a coma? Who told them to have a boy sleep with someone he thought was his aunt most of his life? Who told them to constantly dumb down women and make them victims to drive ever plot? Yes, these are the type of head writers we have on this show, and this was their big vision for the Summer. <_<

Fans are always going to complain, but right now seems to be one of the high points of complaining on various boards, especially with this current writing regime.

I remember when the mags used to say Y&R had the least negative feedback of any soap on the air, I honestly don't think that's the case anymore. If anything, Y&R is probably near the top of negative feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think we are assuming that this show will be around in the next 5 years! If CBS is the one pushing this stuff and faster pace, I will just go ahead and assume they have a "strategy" they are working on!! :lol: I am not even going to utter anymore criticism about what's going on..it's becoming all too clear. Y&R has lost its BRAND!! :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Today's show was mostly a blur for me. The only interesting parts were Nina and Chance. The rest went in from one ear and came out the the other ear without meaning much...LOL.

And oh dear gawd...Love ya Thom...but you are stinking up the place. His scenes with Chance and Nina today were just laughable.

At this point I am finding ATWT more enjoyable than Y&R and that is saying something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If we ever see an immediate response. How many times have we said "give it time, it will get better." Howevere, it never does, we've seen it with various other shows and writers. Judging by what I've seen with this regime, it's been one constant downward slope since the beginning.

I personally wouldn't mind Smith and Alden's return. At least they generally knew how to pace stories and they understood the motivations on these characters.

We never know until they try. If Y&R and soaps are ending in a few years anyway, I'd like to say at least they tried to fix this show by hiring better, more component people, rather than doing nothing about the problems on the show.

The next regime could be as bad as this one, but if daytime is dying anyway, what do we have to lose? I want to see more competent and strong people with clear visions in there. I do not believe having 3 Head Writers helps the cohesiveness of this show. Also, given that two of them are Fi-Core writers, it really hurts this show's reputation with the WGA and within the industry. The show deserves better than that. The fans deserve better than that.

They've had since the beginning of this regime to fix their pacing problems, and they haven't. They've had since the beginning to think of some creative and good stories for their black character, and they haven't. They've had since the beginning to balance and rotate the usage of their cast, and they haven't. They've had since the beginning to stop victimizing women in order to drive story, and they haven't. They've had a while now to show remorse and some redeeming qualities in their psycho/villains and explore their motivations, and they haven't. There's many more problems I've seen since the beginning that have only gotten worse with time.

I'm willing to take on a new regime if it means daytime is dying anyway and if it means I won't be getting the poisonous vision of this writing regime on my screen everyday.

The backlash against Y&R's writers have been every bit as bad as GH and AMC over the past 4 months or so, IMO. Especially on this board.

Fans will always complain, but the backlash on the boards against Y&R seems extra intense at the moment, and I for one understand it completely.

Daytime might be dying, but I'd like to say at least they tried everything they could do to save it before it went off.

There might never be a viable long-term solution, but if we want this current vision for this show to change, they only way to do that is by getting a new writing regime, especially since this one has been set in its way for a while now and that doesn't appear to be changing.

Indeed and it's more proof to me that this current writing regime doesn't learn from its mistakes. Devon being a pervert that had sexual feelings for his family was a flop ever since the time he had similar feelings for Lily. Also, these people are never written for, and this is what they give them when they bring them out for one episode a month or so? I don't even need to get into the horrible writing for black characters on this show that's only gotten worse with time with this writing regime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have no problems with that. The show is called the YOUNG and the RESTLESS not the OLD and COMPLACENT. At some point the main focus has to be the next generation of characters and the former leads have to move into a supporting role.

Aren't the people you're saying have stolen the spotlight roughly the same ages that the main players were back when the show started?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Soaps are a multi-generational format that should serve the interests of various age groups, with an ensemble cast of rotating front-burner characters. Y&R has historically thrived in that particular format.

I can't even say Y&R is phasing out many of the their veteran cast. They're just writing for them horribly and most cases, dumbing them down or portraying them as out of character.

Not to mention, there's a horrible problem this writing regime has with neglecting certain members of the cast, hence the balance is often so off.

Y&R's veteran cast has always been front and center, but they always had a healthy mix of younger and new characters that were well-developed. I think right now, their younger cast and whatever new characters this writing regime creates are so poorly defined and so poorly integrated that many just don't care for them.

Y&R's focus has never strictly been on youth, it has always been multi-generational drama.

The focus on only youth at the expense of other age groups is some Brian Frons philosophy, and we've see how well that's working on ABC Daytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't say people are placing Carlivati on a pedestal. If you look at the episode thread there are as many complaints as words of praise (although that's mainly my fault) and other boards are also mixed.

The difference between OLTL and Y&R right now in terms of storytelling is that I think OLTL can tell some stories right. I haven't seen this with Y&R.

One of the reasons fans have become dissatisfied with the show is the poor storytelling. I don't think fans just wrote off the "dream team". It actually made me feel very sad to come here and go to other boards and see people who were so excited about Adam/Rafe, or about Phillip's return, slowly become disillusioned and depressed by what unfolded onscreen. The same happened with Deacon's return. And with MJ. And with Mac's return. And with Billy/Mac reuniting. And with the Nikki/Paul relationship. And with Adam's gaslighting.

I have not seen them tell one solid story in many months. The closest is the Lily cancer story, which at times is barely even about Lily.

I have watched Hogan Sheffer ruin 3 soaps and I just don't believe he knows how to tell a soap story. I think this goes beyond fans just being perpetually unhappy with the people in charge. This is much more pervasive and damaging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At some point would be fine, but the very clumsy, obvious degradation of once important characters (Nikki, Jack, Lauren, and even though this is not new for them, Jill and Paul) feels very forced. The other complaint I have is that they are doing a horrible job at bringing in the new characters to replace those they deem unworthy. Their big new stud Billy is a pale imitation of Jack at his best, or even at his mediocre, and shoving him into every story and having women fall over him doesn't make a difference. Adam is a disaster and I still have no idea where they are going with him. The Scoobies, who are poised as the younger generation, are a mess, and the one who is most tolerable (Daniel) is the one whose portrayer may not be around that much longer. Noah has been squandered and viewers have no reason to care. Abby is a joke. Eden is a joke. Mac is a bore. Colleen is irrelevant. Victoria is irrelevant.

Not even getting into the Shick/Phick fiasco and the huge damage done to Sharon and Nick.

That leaves Chloe, who is often poorly written and who survives mostly because of the abilities of her portrayer, and Chance, who hasn't been around long enough to ruin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know I absolutely agree with this..it is absolutely time to focus on the next generation. The problem is this (and this is not really a bash against the actors coming up)but they are as BORING AS DIRT!!! For me, they have no ONSCREEN PRESENCE whatsoever. I don't know, maybe it is just me..but being pretty and handsome doesn't cut it for me if you can't hold my attention. For goodness sakes, I am more drawn to a bloody stuffed cat and it manages to entertain me. Mr. Kitty vs. Devon, Amber, Daniel, Kevin, Jana, Heather, Colleen, Tyra..let..me think about that for a second..Mr. Kitty it is!! :lol:

I don't think that Nick/Sharon have been damaged..it is just their dysfunctions on steroids and very strategic!! :lol: Probably the only s/l I have laughed at this entire time along with Victor/Ashley...hilarious beyond words!! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy