Jump to content

July 13-17, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

How the heck can AMC be 3rd in the HH yet 6th in total viewers? :huh:

Meh it's not over for soaps, they're still viable, they just need people in charge that care about the genre, instead of the same recycled hacks over and over.

It's the people in charge are the ones ruining the soaps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think that the headwriters and producers want to save their jobs so they are writing what they consider to be entertaining stories featuring characters that the fans "like." The reality is that they are delusional and have no respect for us the fans so they tell the incoherent stories and overexpose characters until we hate them. They are so caught up in formulaic drama for drama's sake that they forget to tell entertaining stories. It does not matter any more. It's over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still think there is a market for soaps, probably not the current brand of soaps, but some version which could air in daytime. I also think that it's still possible for soaps to have a decent level of quality even with few viewers and a small budget. I know the soaps are going through very hard times now but I think many of them are run by people who don't know soaps, or who are burnt out, or don't want to know soaps, and don't care about viewers. There's network interference as well but I still believe if the networks just got their act together and if a better quality of producers were onboard then things would turn around. There's still some good in daytime, here and there. I know all the soaps get bad breaks now but I think some of it is in their control. I've seen Sheffer and Hamner pull the type of stuff at other soaps they are now pulling at Y&R, so I do think if they go then the show might improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I agree. I think they are done. Daytime lost much of a generation of viewers starting in the the late 1980s and has never recovered. Daytime soaps sealed their own fate when they let that happen. There are shifts in taste, where a viewer goes from one show to another, and there are generational changes, where viewers tune out on an entire genre. A generation tuned out on soaps and now nothing can bring them back. Once you lose a generation, you also lose their children. In a strange way, I think there is a parallel between daytime soaps and the newspaper industry. The only difference in my opinion is the world needs newspapers. I think soaps once served a purpose beyond pure entertainment. Now, they aren't even entertainment for many people.

I agree totally with this. You mentioned OLTL in a previous post and it is a great example. It is stuck at a 1.8 and that is fine I guess. Once GL is gone, whether OLTL is in last place in the ratings or third place has nothing to do with OLTL. It solely depends on whether other shows are moving up or down around it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I completely agree that the soaps can be repackaged in the daytime tv to attract a younger audience. I have always thought that the telenovela format is the way to go. Yet something like the Real World might work. A combo reality/drama soap without expensive sets or camera work. I am not sure that year round episodes will be feasible any more, maybe 20 to 23 episode seasons like in prime time. Of course, ABC will hire the same tired headwriters and producers and use the same annoying characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dunno.... I think it's too early to start hemming the shrouds. Daytime isn't dead yet. I think with all things currently we are seeing a 'corrective'. There is a huge societal shift doing on in almost ever facet of life, and it's too soon to predict how any of it will look in the end. I think we will see Daytime Drama continue in some format - reduced, redone and perhaps only on one network - but we will have it. Telling serial stories, as Tony Geary so rightly phrased it, is part of the human makeup and we've had them forever. So much will depend on how our multi-sensory children grow and express their expectation. We've seen the 'end' of the radio generation and the literature generation, now perhaps it's happening for the tv generation as well, as everything shifts towards the net. In that experience radio and literature adapted. TV has yet to catch that particular wave even though some try.

I think 20 years from now we will still have daytime drama. My selfish hope is that GH is one of the ones that can continue in some sense, but even if it isn't something will be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, I really thought ATWT would go up last week. I was all for them bottoming out in order to get rid of the head writer and executive producer, but it seems like they think hiring some new writers will help the situation (a band aid solution when an operation is necessary). If the new writers can talk them out of doing these stupid self-contained episodes, that will help - but I am beginning to wonder if it isn't all too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I strongly agree its been evident to me "for years" they are writing "against" the genre esp ABC soaps

they do "the complete opposite to make an easy success"

fans have said for years what they want to see

but the steadfastly refuse and continue to do so listening to their focus groups.

Which is tanking two of my shows.

I think they want them to fail for other programming for

the time slots. Its pretty obvious they aren't writing for success in two of my favs I've watched for years.

What better way than to say

"hey they aren't watching them"

never mind they make it impossible to care to follow them with lousy story lines, piss poor dialog

its the dialog that gets me in a rant most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. The soaps are collapsing. A downward trend, not now..not last month...not last year...this has been going on for many many years and the reason has to do with not one or two factors but with several factors, sort of like a 'perfect storm'.

People, get ready, in the next five years the soaps are dead. Probably Young and Restless will survive on CBS or at a cable channel, maybe along with Bold and Beautiful..maybe if we are lucky enough, maybe as a weekly series.

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy