Jump to content

Y&R: Episodes Discussion for the week June 22


Recommended Posts

  • Members

IMO, CE is hotter than MM. I can't get use to MM just yet. His acting is ok. There isn't really anything wow about him. I would have rather seen CE and Yanni at the ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 871
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Thanks y&rworldturner. I stopped reading where you said "since we all know what happens next week" so sorry if I snapped. :)

I'm glad MM's making these acting choices. He's not utterly different like Tammin and Amelia, although most of that is in the writing. I really think he's got the potential to be as good of a recast as TSJ on OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was glad Rafe played shocked, since this came from out of the blue.

I felt bad for Muhney, given all that expository text about his history and motivation. But I think it is useful, since so many viewers couldn't understand Adam's line of thinking. Now we know what the writers want us to think. By having Muhney recite all that, it brought the actor up to speed, and it connected the audience and those events with MUHNEY.

What a frenetic first two days. He acquitted himself well. I think in several weeks/months, we'll have a better handle on how he is going to play the character, and can judge better. For now I will say that I expected this Adam (because of his looks) to be "harder"...but I think Muhney has really been trying to play soft.

The precise timing of the "turn to Rafe" does raise questions about the timing of the actor switch...but I'm over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TSJ was lucky because his debut storyline was one of the few well-written stories Todd has had since somewhere around 1995.

This Adam story is so hollow, I don't think any actor involved will make a difference. It's all shock value. Being shocked isn't always a good thing, it can sometimes just make people become numb to a story. I also think they only brought up Hope because they finally realized, very late in the game, that people didn't understand, and increasingly may not even care, about why he's doing what he is.

I wish so much of the storytelling on this show didn't seem like, "Hey, this sounds cool!" "OK!" then months later, "Oh crap we did this wrong...let's sort of fix it." "OK." "Yeah. We'll do that. Hey, this sounds even more cool!" "OK..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Oh man, after today and Monday's US episode....I'm starting to have bad feelings. I don't like these turn of events. I love MJ but I didn't like what she did to Summer (though the way she made Summer sick was pretty brilliant). You can't have a villain intentionally hurt a child physically - it just ruins the rooting value (at least for me). Now if was a kidnapping or psychological damage - I'm fine with that.

Then on Monday's ep.....we'll I'll post my thoughts on Monday.

*sigh*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But what was Adam's thinking? He doesn't get how his mother handles her blindness and blames his sick and deviant side on his father? Ok, is that supposed to excuse his behavior? Then let's have Adam say that he never meant to hurt Ashley or for her to lose the baby. That is not how it played out on screen. He confronted Ashley on the stairs dressed up as Sabrina while the elecrticity was out and a storm outside was raging. What exactly did Adam think was going to happen?

I didn't like Adam because from the get go he never took responsibility for his actions, but he didn't come off as a psycho just a manipulative jerk who liked to throw his Harvard degree around to validate that he was smarter than Nick and Victoria, like that would mean anything.

That whole Adam talking to Hope's picture scene was just a sloppy fix because the writers probably read that viewers didn't get what Adam's motivation was, along with some attempt to gain some sympathy for poor Adam raised by a blind woman who had a good heart but little money. And now feels bad about what he did to Ashley. Won't stop him from tormenting her though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. I didn't mind MJ and thought the actress was doing a good job with the part. She is a genuine psycho with some vulnerability but why would the writers go over the line once again by having her eat a peanut butter cookie and giving a young child "a kiss of death" just to get her parents to interact and worry over their sick child. People flipped when Gloria threw a steak outside and let Fisher out of the house and yet the writers think viewers will just think it's fine that MJ is willing to kill a child to make her plans work. Even Sheila wasn't that bad and she was a pycho. And why is it so important to her that Phyllis and Nick get back together? Even if they did she would still have to deal with Jack being Sharon's soft place to land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy