Jump to content

ATWT: June Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

So, they brough Daniel Hugh Kelly back for this?! :rolleyes: What a waste! He obviously thought so too, and gave a perfect example of the art of scenery chewing.

And Jake Silbermann really showed his shortcomings today. He's just not capable of pulling off these highly emotional scenes. It all seems so forced.

Contrast him with Ellen Dolan, and the difference becomes painfully obvious. I may not approve of Margo's actions all the time, but Ellen always delivers solid performances.

And tomorrow we get more of the Meg saga. Oh joy! <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ruxton, I am watching todays ATWT now. You are absolutely correct. Silbermann was horrible today. It's kind of amazing that after 2 years, he has not improved one bit. He is not natural and he always acts like he's acting. No wonder he's never been offered a contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually it was JellieCat who said it. I was going to agree with her but I didnt quote her correctly.

I hope we dont see DHK again. Silbermann can't act. He doesn't know how to show emotion at all. Van was just as bad today. He must be going to the acting school of Silbermann. Van's scenes with PS at WorldWide were bad. I am so tired of seeing his weird facial exp​ressions as he tries to act. The way he delivers his lines has gotten bad too. He comes off so holier than thou attitude. All this time with Silbermann hasnt helped Van's acting at all. It has actually made his acting worse. He needs to be paired with the heavy weights again. Both Jake and Van need to see Ellen Dolan's scenes. That is acting and showing emotion. Ellen Dolan was great today. I enjoyed all the Hughes drama. I also liked the chat between Adam and Casey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah...boy, Silbermann sucked today. It's bad enough he just can't act, it's a PITA TIIC keep trying to make the Winston/Noah non-relationship into this huge "thing" that tries to echoes the James/Paul relationship.

Or maybe it's just a pita that I remember the James/Paul saga and how it was a thousand times better than this crap.

I felt really let down by the quick Margo/Casey/Riley reveal. Yeah, it was kind of obvious that Riley was Adam, but once again, TIIC have failed to use the situation to generate any suspense. What would be the harm in letting Margo and Adam keep that secret from Casey for a while?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Amen to Silbermann sucking today. The difference between James/Paul and Winston/Noah is that Anthony Herrera and Andrew Kavovit COULD ACT!! You could feel Paul's pain for having a father like James. Kavovit was one great actor. The Paul/James story had so much more history than Mayer/Noah and Silbermann sucks as an actor. Silbermann is just saying the lines without any emotion. He sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, the writing has done Silbermann no favors, but every time he tries to convey an emotion, he just screws up his face. It looks more like constipation than anything else. And frankly, I don't get the angst Noah's supposed to be feeling here. When we first met him, I could swear they were already estranged, and Noah was rejecting everything his father stood for. And TIIC expect me to believe that two years later, Noah's still "torn" about the "truth" about his father, which includes, killing his mother, nearly killing Luke, whatever the point of the Ameera kidnapping was, and kidnapping him TWICE??

Do they want us to think Noah's an idiot or what???

And let me add a thumbs down to the mind-numbingly boring Luke/Damian scenes. Yes, by all means, let's spend endless amounts of time watching Luke and Damian bond. I rolled my eyes everytime Luke had to praise Damian's genius investigative skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yup Silbermann makes those faces to show emotion and now his has Van doing it too. Which makes it so frustrating. Noah is dumb plain and simple. The character hasn't grown and Luke is slowly being taken down by Noah.

I swear Van's acting today had me livid mad. I hate how his acting has deteriorated.

I rolled my eyes when Luke blamed Damian for Noah's kidnapping. Pleaseeeee....Luke is such an ass! He is so clueless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that's a chicken/egg debate. I've never seen Hansis as that great an actor. Is Silbermann bringing him down...or is Hansis completely inhibiting any chance Silbermann's ever had of growing? I don't believe for a moment Silbermann has ever been "comfortable" in the role of Luke's gay boyfriend. Hansis hasn't "acted" since coming out to Holden, which was way before JS showed up.

Re: Adam---the sad thing is, I think that's a story that could add a lot to the show. But as usual, instead of letting it play out all over the canvas--Adam is one of the most connected characters they could bring back, he's got family up the wazhoo on the show---TIIC have hamstrung it by not playing out those connections. I wanted to scream today when Adam brought up his brother Will (and Gwen) who are freakin' out of town and have been for the last year but failed to acknowledge any of his other family IN TOWN.

What I don't get is the casting. The kid in the role doesn't look like he could jaywalk and lie about it. And in Pissy's World, that means she'll get bored with him in three months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's definitely Silbermann, and the writing. Van did great in Luke's coming out story, and had some good scenes during the election story, and with Laurence Lau. Give him some better writing (which of course is almost impossible on this crap show) and a better scene partner, and I'm sure he will do better.

Maybe when Forbes March's character shows up...... *fingers crossed*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A friend of mine who saw Silbermann during one of those meet and greet in Fl said Silbermann was a total ass to him. He said Silbermann was sulking most of the time there and not with the rest of the ATWT cast. I also think Silbermann hates the role but he still sucks as an actor.

I keep thinking where are all the Hughes now that Adam is back. Kim, Bob and etc better be included soon in this story. Hell Lisa should be involved too. I agree about the actor. He looks too adorable to be a attempted rapist. I hope Pissy finds some good stuff for him to do. It's wishful thinking on my part.

I think Silbermann needs a LOT of acting lessons. I still don't think they would help cause his acting is atrocious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ugh...seriously, be prepared to skip over huge chunks of Meg whining about the men in her life.

The Margo/Casey/Adam stuff isn't that bad though. But I don't like how Adam is blaming Casey's jealousy as the reason he wants to tell Tom. It's manipulative and annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy