Jump to content

Y&R: Spumor


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The character had amazing potential ever since Bell created her--is there any doubt he was planning to bring her on at some point?

Alas, LML got to do that first, and basically brought on a hair model with a name and a last name, and not much more.

While they haven't done much to improve her (though she was far better while working at Jabot), it's not entirely this regime's fault. Adult Heather was created as a nothing.

What has this go to do with my suggestion? :huh::lol:

Did I say that the writing is great? Or that there are no "writing limitations"? It seems that you, of all people, would love an effort to create more of a personality for Heather??? I'm so confused right now, maybe because it's late.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That's your opinion. She's fine with me. But if a recast is ever in question with a stronger actress, then fine. They just shouldn't even think of killing off another character after so many deaths, who happens to be a legacy character (even though she hasn't made that much of an influence anyway).

Definitely, the new writing team hasn't done anything to improve what LML brought back.

When you said she needs more of a personality, I responded with "these writers have limitations" meaning that they won't put in effort to actually do something with her. Of course I would love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Latham should've never brought her back, especially with this actress. Paul has had very little airtime this decade, and Heather's introduction brought absolutely NOTHING to his life. This character was botched from the beginning.

They could fix that, but they have too many problems areas that are more important that they don't even pay attention to.

The best thing to do would be writing this character off.

:lol::lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I was just distraught over the fact that all of these people keep their jobs and probably will stay on this show for years, while she is apparently being written out - meaning that they should start cutting the fat with more talent-less people and then cut her.

But I wasn't addressing this to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would agree with everything you say...except with Adam (at least in the beginning). I totally bought her as an infatuated young woman. I thought she and Adam were a shockingly good mix...both grew up fatherless, had to work their butts off to get through school, postpone personal lives in order to work their ways through the ivy league, reconnecting with their dads. And in that, with a little Princeton-Harvard rivalry, it just worked.

Vail is a Princeton grad, and she's sexy...so I kind of figured Heather "gelled" when Vail finally started to play herself. INSTEAD of a stuck up prosector.

Had the writing "popped" for her, she would have played the sexy young girl with moony eyes for the man of her dreams (basically what Lily is doing now)...and then we'd have seen her go down the road of disenchantment and bitterness as Adam was revealed as the bad seed.

In the process, it would be Paul who'd be her rock through that (building the father-daughter relationship), and we'd end up with a more substantial Heather on the other side.

I think they are poking around at bits of that...but they aren't using her best asset...flirty, sexy, girly. If they'd write for that, I think she could grow into the role quite nicely...and Heather would mature with Vail.

Yes, and what you write kills me. Heather has such a history on this show. We saw that little girl in the CRIB. A character like that should either be kept off the canvas or, if brought back, should REALLY be written for. There are people who watched her infancy arc (Paul marries April to give her a name; she almost dies; Paul joins a cult to escape his responsibilities), her youth arc (she grows up in the abusive household that causes her mother to kill her stepfather). That character had BUILT-IN history and ROOTING VALUE. Virtually none of it has ever been mentioned, used...not even in subtext.

What a f*cking waste!

On this show, you never want to put a rootable character in the prosecutor's office. Who can root for the character that is always trying to imprison the wrong people? They should have left the recurring Glenn Richards (I hated him, but who cared...he'd be gone soon). Heather should not have been in that role.

Even her brief stint at Jabot, interacting with Jill and Nikki and Brad and Gloria, etc., was marginally better. And there she could be the flirty girlfriend of Adam and dress sexily...all of which suited her better.

Heather also has some trailer-dwelling grandparents (Dorothy and Wayne) and a VERY rich aunt who took care of the family (Bobbi). Where are those people? How did they shape her? We KNOW Heather's backstory, but it has all been wasted.

If you mean "rest the character", I totally agree. And if/when she comes back, it needs to MATTER.

If they kill her, I will spit nails. Not because I care about her now, per se, but because a baby we saw in 1979, aged to adulthood, is SUCH a rarity. If you're going to keep her alive in story, you better USE her well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But this list is really quite appalling, dmarex.

I'm not sure I'd put Vail on this list, but to be honest, she would be close to it. I'm also not sure about Ford...for me, the jury is still out...and I'm impressed by what I perceive as growth and improvement.

But, let's pretend that's not true. So, then you have this list:

Bloom, Ford, Goddard, Heinle, Khalil, Marcille, Sursok, Nash

Most of your younger canvas is sh!t. What a horrible, stupid mistake. What an awful investment in the future! How could this have happened???

I realize the casting director changed recently, but as long as all these people consume $ and fail to shine...the show has a significant limitation going forward.

Alvin keeps talking about the problems of this show, and I don't know if this is one of them...but this profusion of actors who are not worthy is quite disturbing. (Though I'd take Bloom and Ford off the list for now).

ETA: I forgot Marano!!!!

What we need is Mark Teschner or someone to come in and get us some well-cast young women :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course it is.

I did jump ahead with Ford, at least what she had until Raul. But once that man is out and they reunite her with Billy, will she go back to how she used to act? Because for now she has no chemistry with Miller.

It doesn't seem to me like they tried. They can easily have her in any storyline they want and kick her out if she refuses to participate. The problem is that they don't write for her. She is dependent on Adam's storyline and as soon as that's over they'll be done with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I didnt mean that I thought he would kill her; just that he gave off the impression that he had the capacity to do so. The original Ted portrayed him with more of a dark side when they were together. Its the switch up I see in True Crime stories when an upstanding pillar of the community ends up doing heinous things under people's noise whom would never beleive  he'd do when in actuality, he's a covert monster. Thats a dichotomy in the character as portrayed by Maurice that I dont see anymore
    • I think one mistake that later writers made with Gail was to make her either Lee's angelic wife or the therapist that was an easy dupe for evil characters that required treatment.  Under Marland, there was a series of scenes where Tracy goaded Lee to drink, Jessie witnessed it and spilled the beans about what she saw to Gail.  Gail, then, in turn, ripped Tracy a new one.  I wish that Gail and Tracy scene still existed on YouTube.  It was glorious not only to see evil Tracy be put in her place, but to see some real fire from Gail.
    • I won't be. We all know that the shelf life of a villainess isn't very long. Trisha Mann-Grant is the breakout star of BtG and she is destined for bigger and better things.
    • I feel CBS/P&G got really shaken by 1978-1982 ABC huge rise and domination, thus the changes to the shows. Considering Capitol showed no growth, I wonder if CBS ever regretting cancelling Search for Tomorrow. From the 1980s Ratings thread, Capitol pretty much inherited Search for Tomorrow audience but Capitol ratings were impacted when One Life to Live rebounded in 1985 with Andrea Evans return. Remember Capitol was head-to-head with the second half of One Life to Live. Even if CBS kept Search for Tomorrow, I think it would've ended as soon as Bill Bell had a second show ready. Funny thing is Search for Tomorrow NBC run was only three months shorter that Capitol run.
    • This was Bill's most complicated moment. The pecs stole the show and what was left from Brooke's dignity.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • You are going to be so proud of me because I agree.  I kept thinking why is Sonny/Mo getting all the dialogue and gate keeping everyone's feelings when there are 3 other capable actors in these scenes?  Ned should have told Sonny to shut up lol. I am fine with Sonny getting a reaction, but he got 90% of the airtime for his reaction.  I don't even think it's mental health that's keeping his job.  MB wouldn't get this much time on screen if it was a pity thing.  Frank is too afraid to cut Sonny because of fan reaction.  I know there aren't any Sonny fans here, but I do think there are Sonny fans out there (besides me) lol.
    • I've been looking at the ratings during and after each head writer switch.  The ratings during Marcus' tenure (Oct 74 to April 75) were very good but at first not quite as high a Upton's (who was there six months prior. Marcus left when Mary Hartman was picked up as she was a creator and head writer). I've watched Marcus' interviews on Youtube; she discusses most of the soaps she worked on. She liked the money; she's not all warm and fuzzy about writing for them. She loved nighttime genres that gave her writing more flexibility than soapy dramas. But she was good at writing soaps.  By April 75, SFT was no.2 in the ratings behind ATWT. O'Shea was next (lasted 18 months) and in May 75, SFT high No. 1. When O'Shea left the show as still in the top five. O'Shea moved to OLTL in 77? but not as head writer so not sure why she left SFT. The Corringtons were the safest bet to keep long term. They needed to change direction by 1980 as the ratings were  dropping but still very solid 6s/low 20s share). They should have expanded the show to an hour and given the Corringtons some direction and more budget. One has to wonder about two people who were with the show for a long time: Mary Ellis Bunim was promoted to EP when she was about 28, amazingly and a woman! She as talented but she went through at 11 head writer changes if she started in 1974.  Here's her list of writers: Theodore Apstein (January 1974 – May 1974) 5 mo Gabrielle Upton (May 1974 – November 1974) 6 mo Ann Marcus (October 1974 - April 1975) 6 mo Peggy O’Shea (April 1975 – November 1976) 18 mo Irving Elman (with James Lipton) (November 1976 – Summer 1977) 9 mo Robert J. Shaw with Charles/Patti Dizenzo (August 1977 - Spring 78) 6-9 mo? Henry Slesar (Spring 78 to August 78) 3-4 mo? Corringtons (August 1978 to May 1980) 1 yr/9mo Linda Grover/John Porterfield (May 1980 to mid July 1980) 3 mo. Gabrielle Upton (July 1980 to at least through March or April) Harding Lemay April to June 81 writers' strike Don Chastain (Summer 1981 writers' strike - replaced by Ellis/Hunt Dec 81 or Jan 82) Then Fred Bartholemew comes in when Bunim goes to ATWT (Oct 81?) and he brings in Ellis Hunt for the NBC switchover, they lasted 11 months. Mary Stuart is the other mystery to me: how was she to work with? Did she instigate many of the writer firings? Was she not involved at all. No other P&G show went through this kind of frenetic change. (The Doctors might be a close second but wasn't on as long and not P&G).
    • I'm getting the sense that something happened between Anita and Dante Green that wasn’t exactly copacetic, to say the least. I wonder — did he promise her fame and fortune as a solo artist, and then attack her when she rebuffed his advances? I hope it’s not a long-lost child plot lurking out there for her. Maybe she left behind an sibling in poverty or something instead, back in Cabrini-Green/Chicago. It does seem like neither Tracy nor Sharon’s solo careers turned out the way they dreamed — both ended up singing at City Wineries. I still think Leslie is connected to the Duprees — maybe her mother is Sharon, and she's going after the Duprees because she believes she could’ve had their lifestyle if things had gone differently for her mom. She does have ties to Chicago. That said, I hope this is the last disguise from her toolbox for a while — I’d hate for that to get played out. But I do wonder if she’s going to use Nicole 2.0 to frame Nicole for something down the line? I’m all for giving Shanice more time on canvas, and I wouldn’t hate it if she and Andre became an item — someone who doesn’t mind being public, unlike Dani. Or I can see Doug finally getting fed up with their arrangement and turning to the nurse for some “relief.” Vanessa was, in a way, telling herself off in those scenes with Ted about his cheating. And I have to say, Keith Robinson’s Ted brings a broader range of emotion than Maurice Johnson’s did — though I think Ted 2.0 is benefitting from better writing than OG Ted, whose arc relied more on MJ’s charisma and physical presence. That said, as someone else pointed out, Keith looks like he’s drowning in the clothes they’ve got him in. Hopefully, they’ve got some better-fitted attire lined up now.
    • They are just right there in your face.  It's hard to not see Ciara's boobs at all times.  And simmer down camera man, this is a family show!! The high school stuff makes it weird.  Physically the actors all look fine together.  It just makes me think Doug needs to find friends his own age.   With Ari at least Doug was under the impression she was over 21. I liked JJ and Eve too lol!
    • Specifically that's Kat & she is, there's no other way to say it except like pulling off a band-aid. She's Chad's "#1 fan" IOW, basically, kinda sorta she's an albatross around Chad's neck.  Kat can turn any conversation into a discussion of Chad & what he ate for breakfast or the most minute of minute things about Chad Duell's life & times.  We hope she's not dangerous. We hope she's just boring. That Chad is not back has lit a fire under her. She's upped her number of posts, which all relate in some way to Chad. Now you know what there is to know about as I said Chad Duell's #1 fan.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy