Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 25, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 801
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Supposing even some of the spoilers are true, it would be better if they didn't reveal them. They're so out there that they confuse, anger and make you recoil. ONce they happen though, it may make sense and be done wonderfully - save for one.

But again, spoilers just give you the event not the context, so we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe - if ever there was a supporting character in the true definition of supporting, it's Murphy. Personally, I don't need to see Jack/Cane/Victor and co. going to the bait and tackle shop to appreciate Murphy for who he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol::lol::lol:

I wish Murphy had moved his trailer onto the Chancellor grounds as his man-cave. And guys could come by there to watch the games and crack some cold ones. But I'm not sure anybody in GC does that.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Murphy was just part of a major storyline. I'm thinking he'll be in the background for a while but will eventually be integrated again. Le's hope he doesn't end up like Charlie on OLTL.

If those spumors are true, which I'm totally guessing about since I don't read spoilers, that'd be a great lolz. It certainly happens in real life and should in soap land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Kenny (reading this thread as I type) is the source of the one spumor that you're referencing ("happens in real life") over @ DR. And he was VERY CLEAR that it was unconfirmed. So let's just see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For anyone speculating about the late summer rumor that

I'm the one originally who posted that. A very reliable source gave me the information, but they classified it as strictly rumor at this point, and I posted it as such. I clarified more than once that the information wasn't confirmed. So please, don't anyone freak out, LoL. It's entirely possible that this will not happen.

Also,

Crazy, but true! LoL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy