Jump to content

May 11-15, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

On these weeks that the demos are doing better, and without seeing the 50 and older demos, I always worry when the shows don't move that much in overall HH's.

I know that the 18-49 and younger are more important to advertisers, but polls in the last few years keep showing that the TV audience is skewing older to the older demographic. And since live TV is still the most important demo to advertisers, I just worry that the loss of older viewers is going to end up hurting worse in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Advertisers don't care about the older viewers. Research shows that 50+ people, compared with younger viewers, don't spend as much money and are less likely to try a new brand. The overall audience may dwindle, but as long as the under-50 demo is strong, that's all that counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But the trends say that the younger audience is not going increase as more and more of the younger demos shift viewing habits to the new technology. And in the mean time it is going to take several more years before advertisers and the Nielsen's catch up to that.

That is one of the big reasons that the viewing audience for live television is skewing higher because they are the ones who are less likely to view on an Ipod or the Computer.

Networks are going to be more willing to stick with a show if the overall HH's are still good. If not we will be seeing more shows moved to things like Passions was where even on the Internet you have to pay a subscription price to see them. And frankly right now in this tight economy even if it was my favorite show I would just be left out in the cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The fluctuations in the 18-49 women demo that have been occurring recently suggests that the bigger problem is that the younger audience is not loyal. Watching soaps is not a daily habit and external events influence their viewing habits. Y&R is the one soap that does well on the Internet and SoapNet. The other soaps appear to be struggling to varying degrees. ABC does not even mention GH's ratings when it releases SoapNet's PR statements. As along as the soaps cannot build on the 18-49 women demo and it continues to slip, the soaps are going to have to keep cutting their budgets substantially and eventually cancellation will become a reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And the more you cut out any demo range centering on grandparents and parents you cut out generational transfer viewing too. So many of my online friends learned to watch soaps from their parents or grandparents. When the older generation quits watching, they quit passing it down.

Soaps are so stupid in that continue to allow the network gurus and the advertisers push them for the 18 to 49 target demo during the day. It is a proven fact that many of that generation are not home anymore. Older viewers are the ones home during the day now. They make up the majority of the daytime audience. Daytime soaps don't appeal to them anymore. So they turn off and watch reruns of primetime shows or the news during the day.

More than any other branch of TV, daytime soaps need to reach out to that. Also more and more recent surveys are showing that working mothers are having an even harder time with day care in this economy. The news the other night said that more and more working parents are turning to their grandparents to watch the kids when they are at work because most times it is free child care.

If soaps could get the grandparents to tune back in, then 9 times out of time those young kids when they are out of school will be watching what Grandma watches and a whole new generation of soap viewer is born.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To be fair, I don't think a ton of people really knew about the shocking ending on Friday. I would not even say it was all over cyberspace. Plus, for those who did not know, the scene was at the very end of the episode so if you weren't watching anyway, you didn't know you missed anything.

The test will be how the following Monday does. Will news spread? Will people who missed it want to tune in to see if there is more to the story? Will people who are not sure who Thom is but sense something is about to go down with Cane turn their TV's on.

Since it was all about their wedding, that is where the most of the blame lies. Frankly, it was a boring wedding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes. Also, if there is high tune in the following Monday...(and Bierdz has not been shown since that last Friday)...I wonder if that could actually promote more tune-OUT (on Tuesday and subsequent days) by people who were feeling a little 'bait and switch'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The soaps have no choice. The companies selling the products and the advertisers know the demos of the consumers of their product. They want that 18 to 49 women demo because these women have the money and they buy household and other beauty products. Most older Americans have brand loyalty, are poorer and live off fixed incomes. If the soaps cannot attract the 18 to 49 women demo because it no longer exists during the daytime, the companies will pull out their ad dollars and take them elsewhere. So the networks will then have to find advertisers with products that target older viewers to buy ads during the soaps. This means much lower ad dollars and the soap budgets will have to be slashed. No wonder the soaps are in so much trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, the only thing correct about that statement is that older Americans have brand loyalty. While we've all heard about the older people living on "fixed incomes," study after study has shown that this demographic has more disposable income than any other age group. The ONLY reason advertisers continue to cater to the 18-49 demographic is because they believe older people will not try new products, and will not change their brands, in general (brand loyalty, as you say).

Personally, I think advertisers need to come around. That thinking may have been true a generation ago, but not anymore. But until they do come around, we're stuck with the current obsession with the dwindling younger audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See, the future is quite optimistic here.

Soon, we'll be able to count every eyeball ... or at least, we'll be able to count the eyeballs more accurately (interactive DVRs, online streaming, on-demand and PPV TV).

More importantly, through direct and indirect methods. we'll know the viewer's PERSONAL brand loyalty, preferrred brands, categories of interest, etc. So we won't have to rely on fallible predictors like age and gender...we'll deliver targeted messages that are most appropriate for the person.

The internet is already getting very good at this...and it is all converging in that direction.

Once this happens, it will me much easier to monetize content again. Moreoever, there won't be a whole class of unvalued audience members.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cady had a fairly posh accent or manner as Rosanna - the character was a 180 from Dixie when she went to ATWT, and it was a huge success initially. As someone mostly only familiar with the nagging, miserable or clueless Dixie of the mid-late '90s and early 2000s it was what convinced me Cady could act. I thought she was incredible in her first run. Later, in future stints, her hair and story and performances were all over the place but a lot of that was down to the show for me. She brought some of Rosanna back with her to Dixie in her ill-fated return and a lot of people didn't like it, which I understood but I did think the character needed some change. I think she's had a little bit of the same persona and arch performance in every role she's played since, including Jennifer Horton at DAYS or Kelly at Y&R, who later became a maniac and was easily the worst work I've ever seen Cady do. It has kind of infected her overall mannerisms, I'll allow that, but I do think she brought Dixie back together as herself while still evolving the character when she returned to AMC again in 2012-13. Nonetheless, for me the upshot is that this is a character where Cady's kookier recent performance style suits the role. But I can understand it grating for people.
    • Yeah, Loretta Swit's passing stings. My late dad LOVED the show (he died last November) and watched it religiously. In first run and repeats.  And I was literally born the day after the show's premiere, so I grew up with it! I know many loved later, softer Margaret, but I loved Early Hot Lips. In real life, I'm all for less misogyny, but to me, the early years of M*A*S*H were just funnier. May Loretta Swit rest in peace. Thanks for all the memories connected to my dad!
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 10/29/73-11/2/73 & 11/5/73-11/9/73:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree that she isn't Dixie or Rosanna and shouldn't be acting like either. I just found it strange that she had a naive Southern character and a wealthy urbane character in the past and didn't experiment with accents before (unless I missed it, correct me if I'm wrong). She used to do improv characters on YouTube. She's probably doing something similar here.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And here I thought I'd never think about Lauren Tewes again after her brief appearance in Twin Peaks Season 3.
    • I may be the single person who does not mind Transatlantic Campy Pamela. I think it perfectly suits this sort of Absolutely Fabulous-esque supporting character she's playing much more than it did when Cady tried weird and often broad stuff at AMC* or Y&R, or later stints at ATWT. She's not Dixie and she's not trying to be. I will freely admit some of the other chances she took at other shows often came off stiff, hammy or downright mortifying (Kelly Andrews, come on down). (* - and I say that as one of the few who was somewhat into Cady trying to make Dixie more cosmopolitan in the Rosanna Cabot mold in mid-2000s AMC, just to liven the character up again)
    • There’s absolutely nothing exciting happening storyline wise but I’m always happy to see the vets on my screen so I’ll take what I can get. It’s also just nice to see them all dressed up in the same room, it always gives classic Y&R vibes. The best part? No Phyllis. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Well now we had Ashley's reaction-and weren't we all gasping when she appeared to hate it-but she was just joking!! She loved it. Now we have to see Abby's reaction, and maybe Mamie could come back to say she loves it. How about Jill via Zoom giving her opinion (she'll love it) and bring in a day player to play Mrs Martinez to say she loves it also... I feel bad to keep dumping on this show (not really) but when the choices they make are so inane, it's the only entertainment value the show has. Let's unpack the Nikki birthday story. So Claire wants to throw her Nana a birthday bash as away of endearing Kyle to Victor. Don't quite get the logic there,but OK. She hires a party planner who makes ridiculous suggestions. Slightly annoyed that Y&R are hiring someone for this role for 5 episodes when we never see doctors, co- workers etc. But OK to that to. With all the talk we are expecting something special. What we get is the Jazz Lounge hideously decorated with some ugly tablecloths and a few tacky decorations. They needed a planner for this? Then the guest list consists of family members (no grandchildren)and a few others. Hardly a party. As usual the costuming is pretty awful. A red and black theme ? And our guest of honor is sporting a do that looks like a cross between Cameron Diaz in Something about Mary and Marie from Roxette. They should have had an intimate dinner and ditched all the fanfare. Would have been way more believable.
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy