Jump to content

Useless characters on your favorite soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Members

With the news that

amongst others (I'm sure <_< ) that I don't want to know about LOL, it's time TPTB look into their inventory and cut the damn fat.

So, I ask who are the most useless characters on your favorite soaps?

Y&R

1) Tyra/Ana

2) Devon

3) Mac

4) Gloria

5) Jeffrey

6) JT

OLTL

1) Stacy

2) Shane

3) Jared and Natalie (I just hate 'em LOL) totally kidding.

4) Shaun/Destiny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

AMC: Adam, Adam III, Aidan, Amanda, Annie, Colby, David, Emma, Frank (recast, if nothing else), Ian, JR, Jackson, Jake, Kathy, Kendall, Krystal, Liza (or recast), Marissa, Opal (or, bring back Dorothy Lyman), Peter, Randi, Ryan, Scott, Spike, Stuart, Tad (sorry to say), Taylor and Zach

ATWT: Aaron, Alison, Barbara, Bob, Bonnie, Brad, Carly, Dallas, Damian, Dusty, Emily, Emma, Faith, Henry, Holden, J.J., Jack, Jade, Janet, Johnny, Katie, Kim, Liberty, Lily, Lucinda, Lucy, Luke, Meg, Nancy, Natalie, Noah, Parker, Paul, Rosanna, Sage, Susan and Vienna

B&B: Donna, Jackie, Katie, Marcus, Nick, Owen, Taylor and Thorne

DAYS: Abe, Arianna, Doc Baker, Brady, Chelsea, Chloe, Daniel, E.J., Lexie, Max, Melanie, Mia, Mickey, Nicole, Rafe, Roman, Stefano and Stephanie

GH: Carly, Claudia, Edward, Epiphany, Ethan, Jason, Jax, Johnny, Lucky, Luke, Lulu, Mac, Matt, Maxie (or at least recast), Nikolas, Patrick, Rebecca, Sam, Sonny and Spinelli

GL: Why bother when they're slated to go off the air in Sept.?

OLTL: Addie, Blair, Bo, Brody, Carlotta, Charlie, Clint, Cole, Cristian, David, Gigi, Jack, Jared, John, Kyle, Langston, Layla, Lola, Markko, Matthew, Moe, Noelle, Nora, Rachel, Ray, Rex, Sam, Schuyler, Shane, Stacy, Starr (or - for God's sake - recast), Tea, Todd and Vanessa

Y&R: Amber, Ana, Cane, Chloe, Colleen, Daniel, Devon, Eden, Gloria, Heather, J.T., Jana, Jeffrey, Kevin, Lily, Mac, Neil, Nick, Nikki, Noah, Paul, Sharon and Tyra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC

None are really useless except for Chuck Pratt. No one has a good story right now. The actors who need to replaced -- the ones playing Liza and Colby.

OLTL

Stacey. Kill her off and bring back Adriana for what would be a great Adriana/Rex/Gigi/Brody/Jess pentangle. The show immediately improves ten-fold with that one move.

Y&R

Ana & Tyra. Send them back to Seattle. Pair Neil with Nina, Olivia or Victoria

Mac needs to go back to Africa and come back in a few months played by a dynamic actress

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not necessarily, JellicleCat. (By the way, like the SN, lol.) But I do think ATWT needs to refocus on the Hughes family. I also think the mantel of "moral center" should be passed to Tom and Margo. Bob, Kim and Nancy can visit occasionally, of course, for family holidays and such; however, I'd like to see a "new" ATWT w/ Tom, Margo and their sons (not only Casey, but Adam as well) in the center.

Other characters I'd focus on include:

* Dr. John Dixon: Margo's father;

* Scott Eldridge: Tom's wayward half-brother;

* Frannie Hughes: Tom's half-sister; now a criminologist; virtually unlucky in love;

* The Shelbys: a new family, connected through Adam (Claire Munson Shelby, the matriarch, is Hal's sister)

* Ariana Triandos: daughter of Natalie and Ari Triandos (yes, I know Natalie agreed not to have any children by Ari, but...I can explain, lol); young vixen to come between brothers Adam and Casey; and

* Natalie Bannon Triandos: Tom's ex-wife and Ariana's mother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC: Randi, Natalia, Scott, Taylor, Brot

OLTL: Stacy, Gigi, Justin, Becca, Moe, Noelle, Cristian, Layla, Lola, John, Michael, Marcie (which is a shame, because I like what Michael/Marcie COULD offer, but they aren't being written to)... I'm sure I'm forgetting more.

GH: Matt, Claudia, Ric, Sonny, Jason, Jax, Kate, Carly, Rebecca, Nikolas, Ethan, Spinelli, Toussaint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, Alexis is useless on GH as Nancy Lee Grahn's talent are severely underutilized. Ditto Hearst.

Y&R

Honestly, some of these characters just need to be re-vitalized (Paul, Neil, Devon, Colleen, Victoria, JT)

-But let's go with Tyra, Ana, Gloria, Jeffrey, Kevin, Mac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good Lord Khan, did you leave anyone out? :lol:

That's like 3/4 of the show....also Vanessa has been gone for nearly two months now, and David has been out of town for several weeks. BTW....what do you have against little Sam? And Addie? :blink::P

Plus, who does that leave anyway? Looks like Viki, Natalie, Jessica, Chloe, Bree, Roxy, Nigel, Renee, Langston, Markko, Dorian, Marty, Rebecca, and Powell? Now wouldn't that be a show?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oops. My bad. :D

Yeah, but he'll be back; and I wish he wouldn't.

Nothing. I like Addie and Sam. However, Addie and Sam are, for lack of a better word, tertiary characters. They don't "drive" story - at least, not right now. If Blair is out of town, naturally, her children, minus Starr, would be out of town as well. Same goes for Addie, who'd leave town with her daughter and grandchildren. Of course, that doesn't stop TPTB from bringing back Sam "down the road" as a SORASed young man. ;)

Oh, that's right, Langston and Markko! Thanks, Scotty! I knew I was forgetting someone!

First of all, I'm not even including Powell and Rebecca, since those two probably will be gone after the end of the K.A.D. Killer storyline.

Second, why would people assume I'd want a soap built around so few characters? Out of the characters currently on-canvas, the ones I'd keep are, yes, Viki, Natalie (without Jared!), Jessica (and by extension, her kids), Roxy (but only in a recurring capacity), Nigel (also only in a recurring capacity, as he becomes Viki's new butler), Renee (same as Nigel and Roxy, since she still owns the Palace, where people go and eat, right?), Marty and Dorian. It'd be up to the writers and producers, therefore, to introduce or bring back characters through ones already established (including those slated to leave) who are useful to the show as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B:

OK, I am a Brooke fan. I have loved her since 1987. But... I need a break. A break from Bridge and Brick and Tridge and Trick. Unless they gave KKL business SLs that restored Brooke's kick-assery. And only then would they give her an honest-to-god meaningful, romantic relationship. I can't deal with True Teenage Love Brooke and Birth Mother Brooke and Stepford Housewife Brooke.

Who else? Ridge. A no-brainer.

Taylor (though I have grown to like her).

Nick

Katie (maybe -- although if Brooke is staying, I'd want a member of her family around, too. And since they foolishly had Storm blow his brain's out...)

Donna

Eric

Beth (is she still around?)

I'd keep Rick and Steffy... but only if it turned out that Steffy had been playing Rick all this time in order to get back at him for FEE-Beee's death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy