Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Actually, Anne heche did play Marley for a few episodes in fall 1987 before coming on full time the next year.  She came after Vicky had an accident that resulted in her being in a coma.. and Marley came to visit and instantly was calling out Reginald/Michael.   She had a much handle on the role in those few days than she did when she came back as Marley full time the following year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Thanks for the correction. I remember the accident and Lisa communicating with comatose Vicky but I had forgotten the Marley drop-in. But now that you remind me, I do recall the appearance. And my shallowest recollection of it was that they managed to style Anne Heche's long hair so that it looked like Marley had a shorter cut than Vicky. I'm not sure if they just pinned it up or if they actually hid some of it under her clothes. Marley's clothes were a bit bulky and covered her pretty thoroughly.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I watched some of that again recently and had forgotten, as you both said, Anne was styled better as Marley and had a better grasp on the character than she did in the 88-89 period, which had an awful wig and too much baby rabies. 

Speaking of Anne, this was up before and has been reuploaded. It's a pilot she did in 2005.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If I have posted this before sorry to duplicate but I am not finding it.

Set-up: Marley is on trial for shooting Jake, which she did not do, she has lied & said Jake did not rape her except to her attorney Cass. She was truthful to him, that Jake did rape her. Marley has fled. Vicky is impersonating Marley & finds out about the rape. As soon as there's a recess, Vicky who is furious, heads to the bathroom. 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it is amusing that both Anne Heche and Jensen Buchanan used a breathy voice that sort of mimicked Ellen Wheeler when they played Marley.  But, according to SOD in 1991, Ellen Wheeler wanted to return to AW, but they made her audition and then rejected her.  So, even though she created the iconography of the character, the production didn't actually want her.

It is giving Mary Astor - “There are five stages in the life of an actor: Who's Mary Astor? Get me Mary Astor. Get me a Mary Astor Type. Get me a young Mary Astor. Who's Mary Astor?”

This is prior to the screentest

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is a great frustration to me that both times that JB was out on maternity leave & did not want to come back, Ellen Wheeler was available & willing & at the studio. IMO they should have snapped her up. But instead they wheedled & cajoled & gave perks because someone thought they just had to have Jensen. To me it was one of the incredibly stupid decisions they made in the latter years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had never considered if Tom Eplin either directly or indirectly blocked his ex-wife's return to the soap in 1991 until I re-read that article.

For example, did Tom Eplin ever say that he didn't want to work with his ex? Or, did the production feel that in deference to their lead actor, (after a protracted contract negotiation during Jake's coma), that they shouldn't hire her?  Because it is within reason that SOD wouldn't mention their relationship unless there was some issue, and it is too reductive to blame a single actor, producer, or executive. 

Of course, there's always a third option, which is that the production in 1991 no longer appreciated Ellen Wheeler's performance as Vicky.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ugh, the baby rabies. Not that long ago I watched some of the episodes where it seemed like they were trying to set up a situation where Marley found her fertility doctor (Eric Jansen, played by David Carroll) more sympathetic than Jake. (Apparently Eric also went out with Stacey, presumably as a contrast to Derek.) That never really went anywhere but I remember a scene where Marley went off on Dr Jansen about how frustrating and difficult it was to have to plan and schedule sex rather than just take pleasure in it. And then more recently I have been seeing episodes from the end of AW, where Jake and Vicky start trying to conceive, and obviously the show never intended me to juxtapose Marley's rant from 1989 with domestic Jake and Vicky in 1999, but hearing Vicky grouse similarly about how annoying it is to bother about cycles and whatnot without any apparent recognition that Jake had been through this (only more stressfully) with Marley before was offputting.

Hot take: I am also more offended by the Lumina storyline than I am by the gorilla interfering in Cass and Lila's wedding. At least the gorilla was supposed to evoke memories from the period when Felicia and Cass and Wallingford were together and pay homage to some of the writers who wrote for them. Lumina was a weird supernatural Phantom of the Opera knockoff in the middle of a normally naturalistic show that put too much weight on the not very interesting romance of Amanda and Cameron. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Generally speaking I wonder if it was that different people were in control. So perhaps the people who were so intent on having Jensen really had no experience of Ellen. Or possibly of Anne either. Only of Jensen. 

But, that might not be it. We have no way of knowing. 

Ellen has always spoken so highly of Tom. I never thought about him blackballing her. 

I simply cannot say enough bad about Lumina. Victoria told me that they had told her that they were getting writers for the show who would bring romance. She was cautiously optimistic, but she clearly wanted it to be true. What they brought was Lumina. When I talked to Jean Passanante as I'm sure I already posted, all she said was that she & Leah had written it together & that it was strange. I'll say, strange is a great word for it. 

And I wish Goutman had done better than Carolyn the gorilla but at least it was an homage to a particular time on the show. IOW, what you said? Ditto to the whole thing! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The main problem with Mandy Ashton was that Amanda didn't seem to have any goals or thoughts that weren't about attracting Sam Fowler. If the writing or the performance had been more nuanced maybe it could have been more satisfying, but it didn't feel as much like there was a character there as a plot. But they didn't really do enough to give depth to Amanda's relationships with her family and her background and then also kind of substituted Sam being related to Mitch for real stakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did wonder if they had more plans for Jansen. I think Carroll passed away a few years later. 

I'm one of the few who didn't mind the ending with the gorilla or find it a betrayal of the show. I'm more annoyed by choices like bringing back Sam Groom but not as Russ Matthews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Generally, I appreciate when a soap takes a big swing like “Lumina", “Justine”, or whatever that Egyptian Death Powder was that Carl desperately wanted.  As an avid SOW reader during the early 1990s, if a soap that I stopped watching tried a stunt, I usually tuned back in to see how it was going.

To @Xanthe's point, I can certainly understand why a long time viewer who watched during the Harding Lemay period would feel alienated during these plots.  However, I would argue that unlike pure science fiction, soaps usually play these plots against a story of romance.  Such as the Cass/Matt/Lila triangle during the Lumina story, or Nancy/Chris during the Arizonan/Egyptian artifact plot.  If anything, I get annoyed when a big plot has no repercussions on the romantic lives of the characters, or does not involve the cannon of the show.

However, the production issues during Lumina were so evident that it distracted from the plot.  The recasting of main characters, the cheap effects and costumes did not help.  And then, on screen, we never got clear exposition about what was happening.  For example, was Matt being hypnotized or drugged? And finally, the ending had nothing to do with the established history of the show.  So the fact that it occurred after the cancellation had been announced, and I was feeling more nostalgic for old Bay City was annoying.

As for the gorilla, I can see your hot take mostly because it was only around for a couple of episodes, whereas Lumina dragged on for months.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dr Eric Jansen seemed like a Harding Lemay character to me.  And his situation with Marley (including her fertility issues) also seemed like a Harding Lemay interaction, heading toward a romance (it was dry, talky, and percolating slowly).  So I've always believed the Marley/Jansen thing was something Swakeski pulled from Lemay's storyline projection.  And then when she realized it wasn't flashy and exciting (the superficial stuff Swakeski seemed to prefer), she decided to dump the whole thing, along with the Eric Jansen character.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now the costumes for the costume ball & the ball itself, that was the only thing I liked about Lumina. And the costumes didn't look cheap if you ask me & I'm sure that they were not cheap. 

As far as the F/X go, geeze I hope they weren't expensive! Because they were lame. 

And, yes, Carolyn the gorilla, blessedly, was only 2 days!  Heck, if Lumina had been only 2 days I might find something nice to say about it!

What recasting happened? 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
more
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Anita vs. Leslie, bring it!
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy