Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 04, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ahhhh..let the May sweeps begin!!

I'm really looking forward to Monday's ep. The preview of Nikki and Paul dancing with Victor cutting in - YES! This beat of the story I've been waiting for! It's so classic Victor that the first sight of any problems with his current relationship he starts sniffing over to his former flames. I hope Nikki rolls her eyes and tells him to go back to his "new family" and let her go milk some cows (from her costume, i assume she's a milkmaid now).

Many posters said they see Chloe and Billy as the new Jack and Jill, but I think they're the new Jack and Patty. From the spoilers it says that

. When I read it, i wondered if it was just going to be she finds out that Nick and Phyllis AREN'T the perfect couple, but how cool would it be if SHE's the one who gets suspicious of MJ. the potential for a team-up of these two would be off the charts. Imagine MJ going after Mac on Chlo's behalf in order to keep Chloe silent??

Nina!!! Welcome home!

By the by, I will not comment on this ANY further (no pms or otherwise), but I got a very interesting e-mail from CBS/Bell Dramatic (have no idea how they got my e-mail btw) about some of my postings on here. If there was any question about whether they read our posts, it has most certainly been answered in the affirmative. And this is the only board I post on too. Our opinions ARE truly important to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As much as we all want them to listen to us, I think it would be a very stupid move. Focus groups and internet message boards are not to be trusted overall. It's like what Nancy Curlee told FrenchFan in his interview with her, "What is prevalent in the entire industry, not just daytime, is this terrible reliance on marketing and focus groups. People can only tell us what they liked before, not what they wish they could see. That's the artist's job, to create stories and lead people to conclusions that they aren't equipped to anticipate until they see the scenes. It's like a mother taking dictation from a child about how he'd like to be reared... backwards. It has never worked, never will, yet it's the rare executive who understands this."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I can't say that I'm surprised but I also don't think they will ever or should ever do things just to please the fans. Although, take Cane for example, fans all over have been wanting him to leave the business side and return to his blue collar ways and they are working on that, thankfully. Although, I certainly wish they'd listen about some of their casting mistakes (and she shall not be named).

I'm actually enjoying Clementine Ford as Mac; I never really cared for the character of Billy or Mac until now and I thought her makeover did wonders for the actress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

By the way--I know you won't comment--but I'll bet you got too close on the MJ=Patty hypothesis, and they asked you to settle down lest you spoil it for the others :)

Seriously, though, the number of Y&R posts is clear evidence that the fans hve been enthused! Bravo to the show!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wish they didn't bring Mac back at all. Miller is awesome and I understand TPTB wanting to use him more (one possible motivation for bringing Mac back). But she's useless. Considering how she's settled into Genoa City mainly as a canvas for Billy's softer/stalker side, I really don't see where they're gonna go with her. Waitress?!?!? Really?

And an absolute NO to Cane and her. For God's sakes. No more boring couples!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, I didn't see the need for Mac to come back either. Unfortunately though, it appears that a Mac/Cane/Lily trio is on the horizon plus with a Mac/Cane pairing, it would pit brother against brother, yet again. Personally, Ford doesn't seem to have any chemistry with Miller and he has chemistry with pretty much everyone. Although, I've seen a few sparks with Goddard though, unfortunately, at least if they are going there with Mac, it would get Cane out of Lily's orbit, if they are intending on keeping these actors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA, I was shocked that on Monday's US episode, the utter lacking of sparkage between Miller and Ford as well. Miller has a zillion sparks with the two most boring people on the show, Lane, and not with his soulmate, Mac? I wonder if casting had Ford audition with Miller. I hope there was chemistry then and what we've seen over the past few weeks, and on Monday, is one huge fluke, because the lack of chemistry is such a let-down on so many levels.

It'd be cool if Mac was just putting a wall up to prevent herself from feeling anything for Billy or if there was just no chemistry because she doesn't like what he's become. But when we don't see Mac's inner thoughts, as we have with Chloe, it's hard to tell what the heck Mac is thinking or if this is bad acting.

And am I the only one who saw sparks between Ford and Frantz on Friday's US episode?

As for Mac and Cane, dammit NO!!!!!!!!!!

As Deedee would say, Cane just needs to die. Literally. It's a necessity at this point. And if Mac has to go down with him, so be it. Will Jimmy's have to blow up?

Is the bar still called Jimmy's LOL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, Portugal qualifying was definitely a shock. I'm not crazy about the Ukrainian entry either, but that was always going to qualify for obvious reasons.  I was a bit surprised that they had the video message from Cèline Dion already in the semifinal. I would have thought they would save that for the final on Saturday.
    • Of course. With my luck Frank would probably bring Lily back from the dead and pay Lilly Melgar to do a cameo with Sonny instead though. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Seriously, I know I am late to the party, but why are Sonny and Laura bff?  They've always been friends or friendly although I never considered them to be super-duper close.  I always thought Laura mostly tolerated him for Luke's sake.  The way the show is pretending they've had this decades long tight knit friendship is just weird and OTT.  
    •   It's just so much fun!   She really was what made the show come together. I remember thinking what a mistake it was to write her out temporarily. I wonder how I'll feel during this rewatch, but I'm fairly certain her absence contributed to the show ending after season 5.
    • Thank you @Paul Raven The Kay/Kill stuff sounds like fire.   @soapfan770 I saw someone asking about old episodes you had... in case anyone has old tapes but not a VCR, DM me, I am willing to convert them for free.
    • I think Krista is too hot or her. I think the current actress works bc she comes across so basic. Thats not a dig but she feels very normal and relatable as an average suburban woman. I think if Krista was in the role, Id want more out of her but I dont think Jan is meant for bigger things
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • The sad thing about SC being a great actor is that his character has never worked. Ever. And yes if I don't know what Liam is about and just focus on acting... I can appreciate him. But as soon as I connect him to Liam... I cringe.  Maybe SC should run till he is still young and find himself a role where he can shine. 
    • As I've said before I don't believe the fact that both sisters have cheating husbands (one in the past, one more recently) is a coincidence or anything random. It's pre-thought and pre-planned and the message is clear. Cheaters can be found in all shapes, forms and sizes. Some do it in the most blatant way, they are known serial cheaters and their wives know of their past hook ups (as Dani has already said... she was willing to forgive Bill for his previous mistresses... till Hayley came) and some are more masterfully disguised in the image of the perfect husband. The fact that Dani was jealous of her sister Nicole's happy marriage in the first episodes was not a coincidence. I knew it the first second I heard it. It made me wonder and think what is beneath Nicole and Ted's picture perfect life. The show painted two very different sisters and then gave them the same crisis. It was intentional and dramatically focused on how these women acted after that... How they kept or did not keep their dignity. The contrasts and the similarities are not random. They connected the two stories very well. Telling us that beyond the gates there are secrets... lies and betrayals. And sometimes the happiest ones have the biggest skeletons in their closets. Is all of this a cliche? A soap opera serial cliche? Yes. Does it still work? Yes. And did we need to start with something that is more universal and easier to stomach by the mass audience? Yes. This is only the beginning of the show in terms of stories and themes. We will have years ahead of us to explore different aspects of these people. The first couple of months it had to be a classic sex and betrayal story that makes more people hooked. It's universal. Again. Nothing so far about both husbands being cheaters is coincidental for me. It's too early for that.
    • Thanks, these are great! Joanne Curtis, another soap character punished for having an abortion
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy