Jump to content

Y&R: Week of April 27, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Here! Here! You're preaching to the choir! <_<

Colleen has never been stupid until this last recast and this storyline isn't helping matters.

Me as well, she doesn't have the charisma that this role needs and deserves.

I agree, I'm still intrigued by the MJ character and can't wait for the big reveal... I just hope all the buildup doesn't disappoint.

Nope, nothing Goth about Eden at all but perhaps they will go there?

Such a damn shame, she owned that role and I said several weeks ago that she should come back and wreak some havoc on Paul and Heather.

I cracked up reading this and looking at BA in your avatar with that look on her face, which was perfect for what you wrote.

Or write for them and actually show them on screen. Ridiculous!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 717
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It doesn't matter if it was to me, it was a cool idea and neither of us seem to be sure of the circumstances surrounding how the actors felt at that time. She mentioned she was asked and she told them she felt Phyllis was a good character am sure she's not the only one on set to think of it but that was cool I pretty mmuch liked what she said about the Phyllis character overall, I really don't need any hypotheticals or possible scenarios in how it was done I liked the interview the way it is. Whether or not it was done in passing is not very important the actress did not indicate that was or was not the case, and I did not perceive her response as such. Thanks. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It does mean a little something to me which is why I replied. Since many people read the boards, I can see a scenario where suddenly it's online community lore that Sharon Case came up with the idea for the Phyllis and Nick pairing, which, she did not. The response was as much for others as for you. It is good that you don't need hypotheticals as you will take little from my response. Frankly, that's just fine. We take what we need and keep moving around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Let's be clear your reply to a quote of my post came off as if you were correcting me on something, if you needed to make it clear you didn't have to quote me cause frankly my post was in reference to the actress' quote from the article. So if one of those people you felt you needed to clearify your knowledge on who came up with what idea about a storyline was me, next time don't feel the "need" please. Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Lauren was very reasonable in her reasons for wanting Sharon to pay for her crime. What kind of example does it set for both Noah and Eden that Sharon should get away scott free because she's the town "Darling"? Its like this character should somehow be protected from any fall out from her affairs, and now her crimes, why? No other character, besides Victor, never has to pay the piper, and it is the reason most people now hate his character. Will she at least be shown seeing a therapist or will she be instantly cured by Nick's love?

I also don't see how it is an accident that Sharon let Eden take the fall. She must have been in serious denial not to be able to put two and two together when her mother caught her stealing and called her on it. She was aware of what she was doing and should have remembered handing Eden the bag that day. Are we ever going to see Sharon at least apologize to the girl that she has judged as much as Nikki judged her when she was dating a teenage Nick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Lauren was very reasonable at all and Sharon being the town "darling" has nothing to do with it. My biggest problem is people's complete, I guess or the lack of questions about WHY Sharon would do this. Does Lauren actually believe that a very normal and mentally healthy Sharon would steal those books or those clothes? No, I don't think so at all. I think they all know better. In fact, if I lived in Genoa City and someone said "Did you know Sharon has been stealing things all over town", the first thing I'd ask is "What is wrong with her" or "That doesn't sound like Sharon". Really, why would Sharon need to steal books or clothes? She doesn't appear to be hurting for money at all. Lauren was pressing charges for revenge really. She was mad at Sharon and I get that, but I don't really believe that her reasons were noble or that she was trying to set some grand example for Noah and Eden.

I do agree however, that Sharon needs some therapy.

Also, while Sharon has made mistakes and absolutely owes Eden an apology for the books, lets not act as though Eden is innocent or that Sharon wasn't somewhat justified in not particularly wanting Noah to hang out with her considering - I believe the first time Sharon and Nick met Eden she was drunk, dancing badly at an unsupervised party sticking Noah's phone down her shirt while he was trying to answer his parents' call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The Anita scene with Ted was written all wrong. Dani should have come in like she did, all guns blazing, with Anita showing up and ushering Dani out, as she stays alone with Ted. He's ready for more fury, but at first she treats him like her son, not just some man Nicole married, she's confused and heartbroken, needing explanation. Then, she drops the motherload and tells him to get his damn act together like she did. Anita came off completely one-note. And with both Dani and Anita in the scene, the self-righteousness just made both look like harridans who wouldn't shut the hell up. Very disappointed in that scene. The scene with Eva was much better. It could be good if somehow Vernon starts to soften towards her and that puts the first signs of strife into their marriage. We need something interesting to happen with them, for once. Mona was the MVP today for me. I love Leslie and especially Eva, but I was firmly on Mona's side today. She deserved to get her two cents in. The scenes just left me wanting more of her and her inner life. They should really drop Ashley, Derek, and Tomas and put Mona, Laura, and Shanice on contact stat! I don't get why Leslie continued to lie about where she got the money Ted gave her though? What purpose would that serve? Faint hopes that Mona would still forgive her, I guess? Kat really gets some of the best lines. Through all the bitchiness and judgment, she has a talent at keeping me on side because somehow she's never come across unlikable to me, where someone like Dani, even Anita, falls. The scene with her, Martin, and Nicole was a necessity. Things are coming together to making that part of the family feel more like a family. Now I anxiously await Kat and Ted having a one on one confrontation. It would be perfect if it happened to be in the new Ted's first scene/episode.
    • They’ve been really nailing the fall out super well and your whole post really highlights some of the great parts and ramifications we’re seeing.
    • I like that this episode highlighted the ramifications of what Eva and her rotten mama did. They were so focused on Ted and Nicole, not even realizing that other people would be affected. Eva thought nothing of what she did to Mona bc she was sure no on would hold anything against her but Mona is right in that they ruined her reputation with the Duprees. They dont blame her but they will likely never trust her judgement again. She has to walk by them feeling the guilt and shame that she'll never live down bc she unknowingly played a role in the hell that was unleashed. Not to mention the trauma and trust issues she no has bc she genuinely viewed Leslie as a friend   And poor Laura nearly died when she had that car accident and then had a heart attack and infection bc she was poisond. She's been recuperating for 3 months. She missed her trip to Hawaii and no idea what impact this has done on her relationship and her own plans but no on was thinking about that.   Eva and Leslie need to be made to feel like ish bc this was bigger than just Ted and Nicole
    • On May 12, 1989, the Dynasty series finale aired.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • To be fair, he has no idea what to do about anything.....

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Understand your point.  But I usually see Reginald's mustache twirling villainy as ultra campy bordering on comedic (albeit unsuccessfully).  And upon Reginald's exit, most of the overt camp/comedy seemed to cease. And although I'm aware camp and comedy are not exactly the same thing, I tend to throw them together anyway -- especially when discussing soaps.  You are correct, Mary was not played for laughs.  When I used to term "let's play everything for laughs" I didn't mean literally everything or every character was comedic. But TPTB put so much effort into comedy, it did tend to eat the show for a few years (again not literally). I'm just expressing my perspective on the topic, and lots of folks probably disagree.  That's cool. People who like comedy on soaps tend to defend it, and folks who don't like comedy (or think it want too far) tend to criticize it.  Whichever side of the fence one is on, it sure didn't help the ratings on AW. 
    • Nope, it was not just you, I had the same issues. Most either disagreed with me, or just ignored my comments. But, I most definitely would have liked for them to take another route, even to add sheer variety in the storytelling. It is what it is, the story is a hit with the fans...
    • You may be a casual watcher, but you got SO much right.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy