Jump to content

March 2-6, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

June 26, 2006 is the last time they beat them with a rating (I have to double check). They've beat them in HH viewers a lot more time than they've beat them in rating.

ETA:

It was 7/10/06 for last HH Rating win. 10/20/08 for last HH Viewer win.

AMC Beating GH in Viewers:

AMC: 4/17/06.....*3.....2.8.....10...*3) 1.8/12.....3) 3,477,000

GH: 4/17/06.....*3.....2.8.....09.....2) 1.9/12.....4) 3,389,000

AMC: 4/24/06.....*3.....2.7.....10.....3) 1.9/12.....4) 3,447,000

GH: 4/24/06.....*3.....2.7.....09.....2) 2.0/12.....5) 3,376,000

AMC: 5/8/06.........4.....2.8.....10.....3) 2.0/13.....3) 3,591,000

GH: 5/8/06.........3.....2.9.....10...*1) 2.1/13.....4) 3,564,000

AMC: 5/15/06.....*3.....2.8.....09...*3) 1.9/12.....3) 3,488,000

GH: 5/15/06.....*3.....2.8.....09.....2) 2.1/13.....4) 3,468,000

AMC: 5/29/06.....*4.....2.7.....08...*4) 1.8/11.....4) 3,472,000

GH: 5/29/06.....*4.....2.7.....08...*4) 1.8/11.....5) 3,398,000

AMC: 7/17/06.....*4.....2.5.....08...*3) 1.6/10.....5) 3,186,000

GH: 7/17/06.....*4.....2.5.....07...*3) 1.6/10.....6) 3,043,000

AMC: 7/24/06.....*5.....2.4.....07...*3) 1.6/10.....4) 3,207,000

GH: 7/24/06.......4.....2.5.....07...*3) 1.6/10.....6) 3,157,000

AMC: 8/7/06.......*4.....2.5.....08...*4) 1.6/10.....5) 3,191,000

GH: 8/7/06.......*4.....2.5.....07.....3) 1.7/10.....6) 3,179,000

AMC: 10/20/08...*3.....2.1.....07...*3) 1.3/07...*3) 2,743,000

GH: 10/20/08...*3.....2.1.....07...*3) 1.3/07.....7) 2,627,000

Wk. of 3/2/09

AMC Beating GH in HH Rating:

AMC: 6/26/06.....*3.....2.6.....08...*3) 1.7/10.....5) 3,323,000

GH: 6/26/06.....*5.....2.5.....08...*3) 1.7/10.....6) 3,133,000

AMC: 7/10/06.......4.....2.5.....08...*3) 1.7/10.....4) 3,286,000

GH: 7/10/06.....*5.....2.4.....07...*3) 1.7/10.....7) 3,104,000

Wk. of 3/2/09

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yes, both numbers are interesting....especially that people in the largest city in the U.S. prefer OLTL. Didn't expect that.

And the Charlotte numbers are amazing.....remember when those numbers were the norm for soaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hopefully OLTL too will pass up GH as well next week. I'm not an AMC fan either, but it always cracks me up when either one tops GH...which I have always hated.

Off-topic....but is anyone else watching this Syracuse/Conneticut Big East tournament game on ESPN? They are tied at 98 and are about to start a 4th overtime.

Talk about March Madness.....soaps and basketball. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.1/5,871,000 (+763,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.8/3,939,000 (+644,000)

3.(5) GH: Monday: 2.4/3,260,000 (+785,000)

4.(3) DAYS: Monday: 2.3/3,222,000 (+573,000)

5.(6) AMC: Monday: 2.4/3,184,000 (+827,000)

6.(7) OLTL: Monday: 2.3/3,068,000 (+830,000)

7.(4) ATWT: Monday: 2.2/3,067,000 (+584,000)

8.(8) GL: Monday: 1.9/2,583,000 (+652,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 4.0/5,530,000 (-341,000)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.7/3,760,000 (-179,000)

3.(4) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.3/3,027,000 (-195,000)

4.(7) ATWT: Tuesday: 2.1/2,817,000 (-250,000)

5.(3) GH: Tuesday: 2.0/2,738,000 (-522,000)

6.(5) AMC: Tuesday: 2.1/2,719,000 (-465,000)

7.(6) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.0/2,708,000 (-360,000)

8.(8) GL: Tuesday: 1.7/2,218,000 (-365,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 3.8/5,222,000 (-308,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.5/3,338,000 (-422,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.1/2,849,000 (-178,000)

4.(4) ATWT: Wednesday: 1.9/2,565,000 (-252,000)

5.(6) AMC: Wednesday: 2.0/2,520,000 (-199,000)

6.(7) OLTL: Wednesday: 1.9/2,448,000 (-260,000)

7.(5) GH: Wednesday: 1.9/2,429,000 (-309,000)

8.(8) GL: Wednesday: 1.7/2,178,000 (-40,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 3.7/5,206,000 (-16,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.4/3,335,000 (-3,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Thursday: 2.1/2,804,000 (-45,000)

4.(5) AMC: Thursday: 2.0/2,536,000 (+16,000)

5.(4) ATWT: Thursday: 1.9/2,454,000 (-111,000)

5.(7) GH: Thursday: 1.9/2,454,000 (+25,000)

7.(6) OLTL: Thursday: 1.9/2,430,000 (-18,000)

8.(8) GL: Thursday: 1.5/2,066,000 (-112,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 3.6/5,148,000 (-58,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.3/3,153,000 (-182,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Friday: 2.0/2,667,000 (-137,000)

4.(4) AMC: Friday: 1.9/2,542,000 (+6,000)

4.(5) GH: Friday: 1.9/2,542,000 (+88,000)

6.(7) OLTL: Friday: 1.9/2,510,000 (+80,000)

7.(5) ATWT: Friday: 1.9/2,465,000 (+11,000)

8.(8) GL: Friday: 1.5/2,016,000 (-50,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DAYS looks like the only soap nationally to stabilize each day and have really strong ratings throughout the week. What happened on Wednesday-Friday? The soaps bled heavily on those days.

Thanks TMOTVSoaps for those local ratings. AMC and OLTL are slowly starting to pass GH as the crown jewel soaps for ABC as AMC had one of its better weeks in the ratings in a long time except that 1.9 on Friday. GH still leads where it matters and that's the demos but ABC can't be too happy with how GH has been free falling the hardest out of all the soaps since 2007.

Maybe ABC should just ask Nielsen not to just include soaps in the north and east and other strong cities. LOL!

Interesting ratings in Charlotte, a 11.2 was just amazing and all three networks were really high. DAYS is actually the most solid performing soap in almost all the markets TMOTVSoaps posted. DAYS is doing better than that brutal 4th hour of the The Today Show.

For some reason the ratings for the CBS Soaps in Chicago don't really tell the whole. I know a few people who watch CBS Daytime over ABC Daytime in that town but CBS has traditionally been operated horribly by its affiliates out there and ABC Daytime has been king since the 70s out there.

The most interesting to jump out at me is how well B&B is doing on its own without strong lead-ins.

Glad you posted the times they air too as it gives me a chance to see how their doing.

I wish we could get a better picture on the ratings on the West Coast because you can tell the ratings don't include all their data. That's the only thing about West Coast ratings they never show up well in the fast nationals. If I had to judge for LA and the bay, I would say their gettings 3s for CBS and ABC and low 2s for NBC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy