Jump to content

March 2-6, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

June 26, 2006 is the last time they beat them with a rating (I have to double check). They've beat them in HH viewers a lot more time than they've beat them in rating.

ETA:

It was 7/10/06 for last HH Rating win. 10/20/08 for last HH Viewer win.

AMC Beating GH in Viewers:

AMC: 4/17/06.....*3.....2.8.....10...*3) 1.8/12.....3) 3,477,000

GH: 4/17/06.....*3.....2.8.....09.....2) 1.9/12.....4) 3,389,000

AMC: 4/24/06.....*3.....2.7.....10.....3) 1.9/12.....4) 3,447,000

GH: 4/24/06.....*3.....2.7.....09.....2) 2.0/12.....5) 3,376,000

AMC: 5/8/06.........4.....2.8.....10.....3) 2.0/13.....3) 3,591,000

GH: 5/8/06.........3.....2.9.....10...*1) 2.1/13.....4) 3,564,000

AMC: 5/15/06.....*3.....2.8.....09...*3) 1.9/12.....3) 3,488,000

GH: 5/15/06.....*3.....2.8.....09.....2) 2.1/13.....4) 3,468,000

AMC: 5/29/06.....*4.....2.7.....08...*4) 1.8/11.....4) 3,472,000

GH: 5/29/06.....*4.....2.7.....08...*4) 1.8/11.....5) 3,398,000

AMC: 7/17/06.....*4.....2.5.....08...*3) 1.6/10.....5) 3,186,000

GH: 7/17/06.....*4.....2.5.....07...*3) 1.6/10.....6) 3,043,000

AMC: 7/24/06.....*5.....2.4.....07...*3) 1.6/10.....4) 3,207,000

GH: 7/24/06.......4.....2.5.....07...*3) 1.6/10.....6) 3,157,000

AMC: 8/7/06.......*4.....2.5.....08...*4) 1.6/10.....5) 3,191,000

GH: 8/7/06.......*4.....2.5.....07.....3) 1.7/10.....6) 3,179,000

AMC: 10/20/08...*3.....2.1.....07...*3) 1.3/07...*3) 2,743,000

GH: 10/20/08...*3.....2.1.....07...*3) 1.3/07.....7) 2,627,000

Wk. of 3/2/09

AMC Beating GH in HH Rating:

AMC: 6/26/06.....*3.....2.6.....08...*3) 1.7/10.....5) 3,323,000

GH: 6/26/06.....*5.....2.5.....08...*3) 1.7/10.....6) 3,133,000

AMC: 7/10/06.......4.....2.5.....08...*3) 1.7/10.....4) 3,286,000

GH: 7/10/06.....*5.....2.4.....07...*3) 1.7/10.....7) 3,104,000

Wk. of 3/2/09

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yes, both numbers are interesting....especially that people in the largest city in the U.S. prefer OLTL. Didn't expect that.

And the Charlotte numbers are amazing.....remember when those numbers were the norm for soaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hopefully OLTL too will pass up GH as well next week. I'm not an AMC fan either, but it always cracks me up when either one tops GH...which I have always hated.

Off-topic....but is anyone else watching this Syracuse/Conneticut Big East tournament game on ESPN? They are tied at 98 and are about to start a 4th overtime.

Talk about March Madness.....soaps and basketball. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.1/5,871,000 (+763,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.8/3,939,000 (+644,000)

3.(5) GH: Monday: 2.4/3,260,000 (+785,000)

4.(3) DAYS: Monday: 2.3/3,222,000 (+573,000)

5.(6) AMC: Monday: 2.4/3,184,000 (+827,000)

6.(7) OLTL: Monday: 2.3/3,068,000 (+830,000)

7.(4) ATWT: Monday: 2.2/3,067,000 (+584,000)

8.(8) GL: Monday: 1.9/2,583,000 (+652,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 4.0/5,530,000 (-341,000)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.7/3,760,000 (-179,000)

3.(4) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.3/3,027,000 (-195,000)

4.(7) ATWT: Tuesday: 2.1/2,817,000 (-250,000)

5.(3) GH: Tuesday: 2.0/2,738,000 (-522,000)

6.(5) AMC: Tuesday: 2.1/2,719,000 (-465,000)

7.(6) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.0/2,708,000 (-360,000)

8.(8) GL: Tuesday: 1.7/2,218,000 (-365,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 3.8/5,222,000 (-308,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.5/3,338,000 (-422,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.1/2,849,000 (-178,000)

4.(4) ATWT: Wednesday: 1.9/2,565,000 (-252,000)

5.(6) AMC: Wednesday: 2.0/2,520,000 (-199,000)

6.(7) OLTL: Wednesday: 1.9/2,448,000 (-260,000)

7.(5) GH: Wednesday: 1.9/2,429,000 (-309,000)

8.(8) GL: Wednesday: 1.7/2,178,000 (-40,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 3.7/5,206,000 (-16,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.4/3,335,000 (-3,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Thursday: 2.1/2,804,000 (-45,000)

4.(5) AMC: Thursday: 2.0/2,536,000 (+16,000)

5.(4) ATWT: Thursday: 1.9/2,454,000 (-111,000)

5.(7) GH: Thursday: 1.9/2,454,000 (+25,000)

7.(6) OLTL: Thursday: 1.9/2,430,000 (-18,000)

8.(8) GL: Thursday: 1.5/2,066,000 (-112,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 3.6/5,148,000 (-58,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.3/3,153,000 (-182,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Friday: 2.0/2,667,000 (-137,000)

4.(4) AMC: Friday: 1.9/2,542,000 (+6,000)

4.(5) GH: Friday: 1.9/2,542,000 (+88,000)

6.(7) OLTL: Friday: 1.9/2,510,000 (+80,000)

7.(5) ATWT: Friday: 1.9/2,465,000 (+11,000)

8.(8) GL: Friday: 1.5/2,016,000 (-50,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DAYS looks like the only soap nationally to stabilize each day and have really strong ratings throughout the week. What happened on Wednesday-Friday? The soaps bled heavily on those days.

Thanks TMOTVSoaps for those local ratings. AMC and OLTL are slowly starting to pass GH as the crown jewel soaps for ABC as AMC had one of its better weeks in the ratings in a long time except that 1.9 on Friday. GH still leads where it matters and that's the demos but ABC can't be too happy with how GH has been free falling the hardest out of all the soaps since 2007.

Maybe ABC should just ask Nielsen not to just include soaps in the north and east and other strong cities. LOL!

Interesting ratings in Charlotte, a 11.2 was just amazing and all three networks were really high. DAYS is actually the most solid performing soap in almost all the markets TMOTVSoaps posted. DAYS is doing better than that brutal 4th hour of the The Today Show.

For some reason the ratings for the CBS Soaps in Chicago don't really tell the whole. I know a few people who watch CBS Daytime over ABC Daytime in that town but CBS has traditionally been operated horribly by its affiliates out there and ABC Daytime has been king since the 70s out there.

The most interesting to jump out at me is how well B&B is doing on its own without strong lead-ins.

Glad you posted the times they air too as it gives me a chance to see how their doing.

I wish we could get a better picture on the ratings on the West Coast because you can tell the ratings don't include all their data. That's the only thing about West Coast ratings they never show up well in the fast nationals. If I had to judge for LA and the bay, I would say their gettings 3s for CBS and ABC and low 2s for NBC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last I remember seeing Ben, he was divorcing Amanda. He came to tell Evie that he still loved her, but was leaving town so that Amanda wouldn't blame Evie for his divorcing her. I'm not exactly sure when, but Evie doesn't leave town until sometime after Nola and Quint's engagement ball. I'm not sure if she leaves before or after Justin leaves in Sept(?) of '83. I grew to like Helena when she became friends with Vanessa, once she's edging her way out of Quint's life.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy