Jump to content

B&B goes primetime in Australia


Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://www.livenews.com.au/Articles/2008/1...ps_The_Simpsons

I am shocked. They've been looking for something to replace The Simpsons reruns in that slot for the past year and so far nothing has worked. They tried Friends and that failed. They tried a dating show and that failed spectacularly. Could B&B be the show that will finally out-rate 10-year-old Simpsons episodes?

I have to hand it to Ten - they couldn't have moved B&B to primetime at a better time. On December 1 and 2, the episodes with Pam, Donna and the bear will air - if that doesn't get the ratings, nothing will.

I wonder if they'll still have to edit episodes for censorship?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This is the first week of the summer 'non ratings' period in Australia,so Ten are doing some experimenting with B&B.

The show is up against the 2 big network newscasts,so will offer an alternative,but I wonder if the audience at 4.30-students,at home women/men will transfer to 6.

Hate to sound sexist -but will husbands be happy to watch,after work, this show that their wives and children have been watching all these years?rather than Simpsons or news?

This is the first week of the summer 'non ratings' period in Australia,so Ten are doing some experimenting with B&B.

The show is up against the 2 big network newscasts,so will offer an alternative,but I wonder if the audience at 4.30-students,at home women/men will transfer to 6.

Hate to sound sexist -but will husbands be happy to watch,after work, this show that their wives and children have been watching all these years?rather than Simpsons or news?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well it's a controversial move and it certainly won't be a good lead in for Neighbours. Two very very different soaps. It gets about 500,000 at 16:30 which trounces the competition but it's pulling in the housewives and teens getting in from school. 18:00 is going to be a time when individuals will have to be viewing it more openly and they might not want people to know their guilty pleasure. It would really have to get up to 700,000 in that slot to stop it being an embarrassment.

And yes they'll still have to do their half hearted butchering of episodes. Everything between 15:30 and 19:00 is 'G' rated in Australia meaning very low impact. I think occasionally B&B might be able to get away with more because it's so unreal and cartoony when it does high drama/violence but swearing, rape, abortion, violence etc is a no go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I wish they'd move it to 7pm rather than 6. Then they wouldn't have to edit the episodes. This week's episodes with Pam and Donna were HORRIBLY butchered (evidently we're not allowed to see a gun at 6pm :rolleyes:). The scene where Brooke slapped Katie was also cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Full statement from city of Glendale https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/9293/16
    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  Also, did Reva ever sleep with Phillip? They always had some "closeness" thing, but I don't know if they ever actually did the deed. If they did, then Reva's the clear winner, with TWO families covered, lol!  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
    • I'm sorry, truly I am, but this literally made me LOL. Tempting fate, much?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh, I have very little doubt that Missy feels some way personally and privately.  Donna was just saying she actively spoke out against Days in public in reference to the gay storylines, which she did not. I don't have super strong feeling about Jen one way or another.  She was always a side character to me.  I still think Missy is Jen regardless of her stupid beliefs.
    • I hated the swap-over; Clayton Norcross, to me, was far superior in the role of Thorne than Jeff Trachta ever was. And the recast left me disliking Thorne when he was the superior son to me. As for Teri Ann Linn, I feel like she got the raw deal. Kristen was very clear as a forefronting character, especially in her rivalry with Stephanie, and it feels like she was dropped off for Felicia, and they never returned it. Not to mention the subpar recast with Tracy Melchior in 2001. Someone like Brenda Epperson (ex-Ashley, Y&R) would've been more suited for that role.
    • I just remember when Leo was marrying Craig (?), Greg Rikaart stated a line and made direct eye-contact with Melissa Reeves, and when the camera cut to her, she looked away. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       Rikaart had a mission that day, and he succeeded.
    • I need to go and find less.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy