Jump to content

Nelson Branco Interviews former HW (OLTL) Michael Malone


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I get what you're saying. And yes, I think deep in the pit of her soul Marty will always have a keenly-tuned understanding of Todd that she wishes she didn't. But it should take a lot of time after this, if ever again, for her to even begin to be able to listen to that. You may be able to understand a monster, but if the monster keeps hurting you how can you allow yourself to continue retracing that ground while preserving yourself? Marty is smarter than Tea or the much more inexperienced Evangeline or even Blair, because she in the past has known how to walk away.

You don't accept anything positive anyone says about the man's work, and you never have. It's a little late to start playing "Hail Fellow Well Met" with me. My attitude towards you is learned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Those are not complex relationships. The whole story is quite pretentious and offensive, he wants to make a European art movie in the American daytime enviroment. And add a little grittiness and gloom of British soaps. It clearly isn't going to work.

It's predictable because we know what is going to happen. And knowing how bad the subwriters on OLTL are, we know the climax and dénouement are going to suck.

Lazy because it feels like it is too easy for him to write this. He poured all his energy into this story that even he knows sucks.

Etc. But you get the point.

I accept it, but I find it hilarious. And a gross exaggeration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I told myself I wasn't going to discuss this story anymore mainly because the damage is done. It's like trying to do CPR on a cadaver mid autopsy but I wanted to point out: she already did have that. She testified for him at his last rape trial. She found a sense of peace and they had reached a resoultion. Higley blew that to hell when they brought Marty back and Ron is just building on that misstep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Higley's handling of Marty was far less complex and three dimensional than RC's. Higley's Marty was a simple character: Her Marty hates Todd, period, but downplays their rape as "something that happened in college when we were drunk kids" so DH can pretty Todd up for Evangeline.

We don't know the "real" Marty as RC will write her yet, though he did do some work with the CC Marty. During that time Marty and Todd were able to grudgingly work together during the hunt for Marcie. He's also brought Marty's innate intelligence, strength and fire back, even as she totters around in nightgowns. And whatever happens here, we know her relationship with Todd goes beyond just "I hate you," which is how DH saw it...negating all the work that had been done with them since. (Yes, Marty left in 1997 decrying Todd as "a curse," but she came back in 2004 recovered and willing to advocate for him, so obviously she had mellowed, as stilted as I found that guest appearance.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We agree that Higley made a mess of Marty. But CC's Marty I saw didn't downplay the rape at all. She was 100% in victim mode. Higley erased all the character's progress and turned her into a weepy, hyperventaliting mess all the better for McBain. Ron made her a bed-bound amnesiac.

Whatever. He's done what he set out to do. He put his mark on a classic soap story. And it was so much easier than writing one himself. All of the controversy, none of the actual creativity. Just add rapist and stir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I watched that. I was actually more appalled by that...because she just swooped in and forgave, kind of.

I am able to watch these two fantastic performers together every day in the current story...and they have a connection that touches me...when much else on this show does not. Therefore, I feel it will not be possible to totally sever the connection when the inevitable happens.

Sylph says it is lazy, because we know what will happen. Not me. I surmise what will happen to a POINT, but I have no clue what the aftermath beyond that will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well getting away from discussion of Rev. Ron and the Church of Derivative Hackery....

I think Malone's interview gives a pretty good road map about why thoughtful writers aren't interested in daytime. It's clear there's SO much he didn't/couldn't/wouldn't say about how the business changed during his years in it. That's the stuff I'd love to have heard about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought the whole board was persecuting you and your finely tuned sense of right and wrong and good writing and bad, Sylph, when did it come down to just me? I'm not offended, I just want to know what date and time stamp I should put on my medal. BTW, "persecution" = always a TKO in rational debate. You can't lose with that one!

I don't think it has much to do with economics. I think it's more like they just don't give a [!@#$%^&*] because these are "just soaps." Just like some of the production staff they interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm thankful to Nelson for the interview, but I believe that a real journalist would have gotten all that and more from Malone.

It was only and always you. But... Since this is totally destroying this thread, I suggest we stop here. Anyway, I will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Wait - so no Will, Jack, or Jen at John's funeral? That’s just weird. What was the point of bringing them back then? Did Julie and Maggie even show up? I mean, seriously.
    • From the comment section of this IG post: theonlydaphneeduplaix Over 70 National commercials over my nearly thirty years career and some how I only have my hands on five

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Thank you @cityofllanview for digging deep and finding this @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000. If anyone feels inclined to dig deep and find more, I’d greatly appreciate it!!!!   https://www.instagram.com/p/DKX9m3ytGIw/ cityofllanview and theonlydaphneeduplaix Now we know Thursday ain't here but here is a Flashback to @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000 featuring the amazing @theonlydaphneeduplaix make sure to catch her as Nicole on @beyondthegatescbs Weekdays at 2pm on @cbstv and streaming on @paramountplus.                    
    • Full statement from city of Glendale https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/9293/16
    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  Also, did Reva ever sleep with Phillip? They always had some "closeness" thing, but I don't know if they ever actually did the deed. If they did, then Reva's the clear winner, with TWO families covered, lol!  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
    • I'm sorry, truly I am, but this literally made me LOL. Tempting fate, much?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh, I have very little doubt that Missy feels some way personally and privately.  Donna was just saying she actively spoke out against Days in public in reference to the gay storylines, which she did not. I don't have super strong feeling about Jen one way or another.  She was always a side character to me.  I still think Missy is Jen regardless of her stupid beliefs.
    • I hated the swap-over; Clayton Norcross, to me, was far superior in the role of Thorne than Jeff Trachta ever was. And the recast left me disliking Thorne when he was the superior son to me. As for Teri Ann Linn, I feel like she got the raw deal. Kristen was very clear as a forefronting character, especially in her rivalry with Stephanie, and it feels like she was dropped off for Felicia, and they never returned it. Not to mention the subpar recast with Tracy Melchior in 2001. Someone like Brenda Epperson (ex-Ashley, Y&R) would've been more suited for that role.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy