Jump to content

B&B: Week of September 22, 2008


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm telling you: Kill off all the men (I'm really NOT joking), give Stephanie one last hurrah before she leaves for Chicago to be with her mother and sister. Some how, have her "anoint" Felicia as her successor. Grow up Fifi's son, whom she tries to position as the new Ridge. Donna and Katie must also leave.

Fix Brooke, so that she is the Logan matriarch, pushing for RJ and Hope and Rick and Bridget and Jack. Fix Taylor, so she is sane and stable and wise again. Let her be the matriarch pushing Thomas and Steffi and Phoebe. Each of these roles need to be SORASd (if they haven't been), but only with the MOST remarkable actors.

Rebuild Spectra around a newly-realized-gay-CJ, and bring in the Baker clan (with Charlie as Marcus' birth father) to represent "the family in the valley". They can get tied up in the Fashion biz as models and so forth.

Have a commitment to NO incest. Note that, in this scenario, it is the offspring of Brooke and Taylor (and to a lesser extent, Felicia and Sally) that drive the show. I know this is radical, but I just feel this tired old show must be put to pasture and reborn. I know normally this kind of reinvention kills a show...and it would be risky here...but the show is so fundamentally damaged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is unusual for me to be so dismissive, so unable to see the "bright side". But, truly, I wish I could just see the current canvas redeemed.

For me, I don't personally care whether there is MUCH more fashion or not. Indeed, for me, fashion is likely to move B&B in a more superficial direction...which is precisely what is not needed.

Don't get me wrong...the Forrester versus Spectra fashion wars were great fun, and B&B could definitely use more of that. That would be highly welcomed.

But my favorite moments on any show, historically, have been quieter, more relationship based. So, high camp is not going to fix B&B IMO. That is part of the solution.

Character consistency, less plot, characters acting with more integrity (they may not be good...but their motivations are always clear). Introduce newbies and INVEST in them.

This is a show that is tottering on its foundation of four aging characters. That is not sustainable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes...but every one of them has multiple offspring (children, grandchildren, friends) who are BIG in story.

The next generation is well established. Sometimes three generations are in active play (see the Newmans and the Abbotts).

You could say "well, in principle, that is also true for B&B", but it is not. There is virtually no character on the canvas in that all important 25-40 range.

Also, think of all the under-used next generation: Kristen, Felicia, Thorne, Alexandra, Zende, Dino, Thomas, Steffi (barely plays), Phoebe, RJ, Rick (basically a weak supporting character), Hope...and on an on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As of last night, the Y&R wasn't posted.

On my DVR, they ran Monday's episode again.

(Soapnet had the right one, but I discovered my DVR problem at 7:30, and so missed the first 30 minutes).

I checked cbs.com, hulu, fancast, and msn tv.

None of them had Tuesday's 9/23 show. MSN actually had the link, but when I clicked the message 'episode no longer available' came up.

I will check again tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They used the rooftop as the "restaurant" in which Owen and Bridget lunched???

That would be cool...but I don't think it was supposed to be the same place where they all exercise, etc. was it?

But if it wasn't, how do they explain the SAME brickwork, and the SAME "Ronn Moss' dressing room door" that we see when the set is used differently?

Very lame. They should at least have covered up that door with a screen or something...unless they REALLY meant for it to be the same rooftop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DKX9m3ytGIw/ cityofllanview and theonlydaphneeduplaix Now we know Thursday ain't here but here is a Flashback to @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000 featuring the amazing @theonlydaphneeduplaix make sure to catch her as Nicole on @beyondthegatescbs Weekdays at 2pm on @cbstv and streaming on @paramountplus.                    
    • Full statement from city of Glendale https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/9293/16
    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  Also, did Reva ever sleep with Phillip? They always had some "closeness" thing, but I don't know if they ever actually did the deed. If they did, then Reva's the clear winner, with TWO families covered, lol!  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
    • I'm sorry, truly I am, but this literally made me LOL. Tempting fate, much?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh, I have very little doubt that Missy feels some way personally and privately.  Donna was just saying she actively spoke out against Days in public in reference to the gay storylines, which she did not. I don't have super strong feeling about Jen one way or another.  She was always a side character to me.  I still think Missy is Jen regardless of her stupid beliefs.
    • I hated the swap-over; Clayton Norcross, to me, was far superior in the role of Thorne than Jeff Trachta ever was. And the recast left me disliking Thorne when he was the superior son to me. As for Teri Ann Linn, I feel like she got the raw deal. Kristen was very clear as a forefronting character, especially in her rivalry with Stephanie, and it feels like she was dropped off for Felicia, and they never returned it. Not to mention the subpar recast with Tracy Melchior in 2001. Someone like Brenda Epperson (ex-Ashley, Y&R) would've been more suited for that role.
    • I just remember when Leo was marrying Craig (?), Greg Rikaart stated a line and made direct eye-contact with Melissa Reeves, and when the camera cut to her, she looked away. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       Rikaart had a mission that day, and he succeeded.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy