Jump to content

The Original Cast of Soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Members

"For Agnes to say that the past sometimes has to be ignored so as not to confuse viewers bothers me, in that it is often more confusing and annoying that past characters do not return or are not mentioned.

AMC was only 5 yrs old when she made that statement."

Have you read the book? I could find and type out that part of it if you haven't. I think what she says makes sense--Ann Tyler was engaged to an aristocrat pre-show but to bring it up always in her present relationship just makes for clumsy dialogue. I think it's been handled much worse lately though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Here's a list of characters who were part of the original cast of "One Life to Live," when it debuted on July 15, 1968:

Victor Lord

Victoria Lord

Meredith Lord

Larry Wolek

Vince Wolek

Anna Wolek

Joe Riley

Eileen Siegel

Dave Siegel

Sadie Gray

Carla Gray

Jim Craig

Price Trainor

Karen Martin

Marcus Polk

Jack Neal

Can anyone tell me how many characters from OLTL's very first year are still on the show today? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wasn't Chris and Edith's brother John also on the show at the very beginning? I believe he lived in another town and was known to be a shady, in-and-out of prison type of guy. I always thought it would have been interesting if somewhere along the way, one of his children or grandchildren came to Oakdale with the intent of seriously [!@#$%^&*] with the Chris Hughes clan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agnes seemed to lose interest in a lot of the core characters in the late 70's/early 80's.

eg

Linc & Kelly left in 80.

Ann was killed off in 81.

Phil was killed off in 79.

Tara was quickly remarried and written off in 80.

Jeff was written out in 79.

Frank Grant died in 82

Paul Martin hung around a few more years,but wasn't given much to do.

Nina/Cliff/Palmer/Daisy became the new focus.Cliff was originally going to be a Jeff recast.

Maybe Agnes felt that the show needed to be restructured, but it did leave a gap.Perhaps those characters did need to be rested,but killing them off was final and the others,save Jeff,never returned.

Maybe Ann's first husband could have turned up and stayed in town as a Palmer/Adam type character. Amy Tyler suddenly returns.

For a show with children in the title,there weren't many around to continue the legacy.

Ann & Paul's daughter was killed,as was Donna's.Jeff never had a child,nor did Paul.

Only Charlie and Joey(Jake)were born and survived in the 70's.

Kelly should have been pregnant,when she left and the child a boy,so the Tyler name could live on.

The show did bring on Kelsey,Tara's child but not long term.

Another trait of Agnes' writing is that chracters are married and divorced too quickly.

Jeff was already married 3 times in 10 years,as were Erica and Tara, Ann, Paul and Linc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me the biggest mistake Agnes made was letting Pine Valley get too big. As many have said in this thread alone one of the selling points of AMC was it's hometown feel in the 70's. When Erica became a big model, moved to New York and then Pine Valley became this big metropolitan area and the whole feel of the show changed.

Along with that all the familiar characters were gone and with all those familiar characters that Agnes got rid of, she replaced all of them with at least 1 new character.

I know many disagree with me but I just see that as a big mistake Agnes made esp. in regards to the future of the show. I don't think making Erica the larger than life character she became was a good idea at all. She almost became bigger than the show. I preferred her when she was part of Pine Valley and part of the stories as a whole there.

I have always felt the demise of the Tyler/English family was a big mistake. And not taking advantage of Erica trying to get control of the Tyler mansion when Phoebe died was a big mistake too. That would have been a wonderful story as Erica would have felt she had finally arrived in Pine Valley society to own the big mansion on the hill. Plus she would have finally stuck it to Phoebe who kept Mona and Charles apart all those years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, like Y&R.

'70s AMC is a world I only know about through history books and my mother's memories. I don't know what that era of AMC "felt" like, but seeing as how I enjoyed AMC so much growing up in the '80s, I commend AN on her restructuring of the show.

As for the Cortlandts, has AN ever said in print that they were a spin on OLTL's Lords? I know the fans have made that connection. I think it's cool that the original Viki, Gillian Spencer, was in the Eugenia role this go round... a much different Eugenia, mind you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
    • KMH's Emily was a harbinger for the lack of dignity many characters would face in the last decade of ATWT. On paper, many of the stories given to Melanie Smith's Emily could have been extremely sleazy, but she was treated with respect and understanding in the writing. By 1996 the show went from often not knowing how to write for KMH's Emily to giving her outright reprehensible material. There were breaks from this treatment, but not enough, with even those breaks often being poorly written or just used to make her look even worse (like her grotesque rape story turning into her using her rape to destroy Margo's marriage).  By the last years I don't even know what the hell they were doing. Wasn't there some kind of mother-daughter whoring story with Emily and Alison? Wasn't Emily getting beaten up by johns? Whenever I think of how they wrote for KMH's Emily I'm reminded of Pauline Kael's quote about Ann-Margaret's '60s movie persona - calling her "dirty" and saying the people who made the movies "knew what men wanted to do to her."  Even as much as ATWT started hiring softcore actors in the mid/late '90s, the Emily treatment was on a whole other level. I have never known what audience they thought they were going to be attracting.
    • At this point the options are 1. Leslie is going to be caught out, arrested and jailed. Hit and run, blackmail etc. 2. She gets off due to lack of evidence. Second option keeps her on the show but how are they going to keep her a viable character? No one should want to have anything to do with her. If they keep her around, won't other characters come off looking stupid for putting up with her? I'm interested to see where they go with this character/story and hope not to be disappointed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy