Jump to content

Knots Landing


Sedrick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Cybil Shepherd has publicly stated Moonves cancelled her sitcom because she declined a romantic relationship.  Her show was less expensive and had higher ratings than shows he didn’t cancel airing at the same time.

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’ve seen Cybill Shepherd make that claim before, and I call BS (and I do think Les Moonves is a dirtbag). Her TV series declined from 30th place in the ratings in its third season to 50th place in its fourth season, after which it was cancelled. I saw the claim on wiki that “at the time it was cancelled that its ratings were higher than Chicago Hope and Nash Bridges” on the wiki page. Chicago Hope was actually higher rated than Cybil at the time. And you can always find examples like that anyway. Renewals and cancellations are based not just on absolute ratings but ratings trajectory, cost, and difficulty of time slot. 48 Hours was lower rated but renewed because it was cheaper.

George and Leo, the Bob Newhart show which aired after Cybill, was also cancelled with similar ratings. Did Bob Newhart decline a romantic relationship with Les Moonves, too? LOL.

Everybody Loves Raymond replaced Cybill in that Monday night time slot the following season, and it ranked 11th. It’s hard to argue that was a bad decision.

I’m curious to understand what else was considered part of the female-centric purge during the 1990s, because I’d never heard of this before.

Edited by Chris 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm guessing Murphy Brown and Dr Quinn? Though MB had declined massively in its final season (going from #34 to #86) - Dr Quinn is probably the one show that got cancelled despite not declining in ratings (in fact it increased in its final season); I'm guessing though that since that show was in its sixth season cast contract might've been up for renewals and another season would increase costs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Again, The Nanny had fallen hard in the ratings, all the way down to #84, when it was cancelled.

 

Les Moonves is a jerk, but he also turned CBS's fortunes around with stuff like CSI and Everybody Loves Raymond etc. The only show that were slightly shocking among those listed was Dr Quinn because it was actually rising in the ratings (but it was on Saturday nights, which in itself was dying when it came to original programming).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He also went out of his way to kill Murder She Wrote. I would count that, and Dr. Quinn, more than Murphy Brown, which had been running on fumes creatively (although as you mentioned the last season, which was pretty much always meant to be the last season, was when they tanked).

There's also this:

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/designing-women-creator-les-moonves-not-all-harassment-is-sexual-1142448/

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was Les Moonves first order of business when he arrived at CBS in 1995. Personally I think Les Moonves had it out for Murder, She Wrote for years. Remember he was moving up the ranks at Lorimar/Warner Bros from 1985-1995 and that overlaps with Murder, She Wrote's first season finishing ahead of both Knots Landing and Falcon Crest, and Murder, She Wrote's second season finishing ahead of Dallas to become CBS's highest rated scripted program (which it remained until 1989/90. Murphy Brown became CBS's highest rated scripted program from 1990/91 to 1993/94, then 1994/95 Murder, She Wrote would once again be CBS's highest rated scripted program.) and also the highest rated drama across the broadcast networks (even beating both Dynasty and Miami Vice. Murder, She Wrote would remain the highest rated drama across the broadcast networks until 1993/94, then ER and NYPD Blue finished ahead of it in 1994/95.).

Not to beat a dead horse, but when you factor in everything we know today about Les Moonves and that his time at Lorimar/Warner Bros also overlaps with the timing of the CBS primetime soaps going into budget mode, I don't find it a coincidence that it was the long-time female cast members of the CBS primetime soaps that were mostly affected when the shows went into budget mode. AFAIK none of the CBS primetime soap female cast members have come forward about Les Moonves but we may never know what went down during his time at Lorimar/Warner Bros.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can’t fault Moonves too much for Murder, She Wrote’s death. It was an aging, expensive show with an older audience in the plum, post-60 Minutes timeslot. Smart programmers don’t wait until top shows completely tank before shaking things up. He put Cybill in that slot, and when that didn’t work, he put Touched By An Angel in there, which became a top 10 hit and thrived in that slot for years. Note that both of these were female-centric shows, btw. I do think MSW deserved a softer landing than the death slot against Friends.

 

I think there’s a strong case to be made for Moonves and his management team not valuing the female cast members as much as the males in the declining days of the 80s Lorimar soaps. Victoria Principal said she was disrespected going out the door as she left Dallas - they took away her parking space and tried to claim that she was let go (which she forced them to retract it. Every time Dallas had to cut the budget, it was generally the longtime women cast members - Susan Howard, Linda Gray, Barbara Bel Geddes - who departed, while the men stuck around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Moonves' purge of female shows from CBS was well documented several years ago when the allegations about him first came out. Linda Bloodworth-Thomason and a variety of other people came forward and discussed how he blackballed female creators, stars and female-driven shows. It was across the board, it was not a question of one show. He remade the entire network in the image of what came not long after: NCIS, CSI. We discussed the sea change at CBS and these women's public comments at length in the Hollywood Sexual Harassment thread at that time.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You posted earlier that this purge happened not long after Knots Landing ended. If it’s well documented, then which shows were purged? CBS’ hits during the 1990s included included “The Nanny”, “Touched By an Angel”, and “Dr Quinn”. All of them had female creators and all had healthy runs.

It wasn’t until CSI became a huge hit in 2001 that CBS became a crime-oriented network. That’s when we saw the CSI spinoffs and later the NCIS spinoffs dominate the network. Same thing has happened on NBC with Dick Wolf’s crime shows, BTW. It’s also worth pointing out that the three CSI spinoffs each have two female co-creators, Ann Donohue and Carol Mendelsohn. 

As for Linda Bloodworth Thomason: her claims of being blackballed are questionable at best. All of her shows were off CBS prior to Les Moonves joining the network. And look at her track record. She had one successful show (“Designing Women”) that she badly mishandled during its last two seasons; one modest time slot hit success (“Evening Shade”) that has rarely been rerun; a John Ritter/Markie Post star vehicle (“Hearts Afire”) that CBS desperately tried to make into a hit but couldn’t; and a “Designing Women spinoff (“Women of the House”) that was a creative and commercial flop. Later on, her “Emeril” NBC sitcom also flopped, and her HBO show, “12 Miles of Bad Road,” was apparently so bad that the network stopped production after six episodes and never aired them. I can’t blame any network executive for being reluctant to green light any more of her shows, given her track record.

I’m not defending Moonves as a person; it sounds like he’s reprehensible. But as a network exec, looks to me like he was just chasing the best ratings possible. I don’t see evidence that there was some massive purge of female shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And all were gone not long after Moonves became fully ascendant at CBS. (Though I'm not counting The Nanny.) Yes, Moonves was looking for success. He also had a clear focus on undoing a female-centric image at the network.

i'm not going to rehash the entire discussion many of us had about CBS history while I'm recovering from COVID, lol. You can look it up yourself in that thread. It's not hard to search those names in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’m just going to chime in and also say at most of those CBS procedurals, almost all the female characters, while given camera and story time, often were hard balled at contract time and considered replaceable and paid less than the men.  And the decade prior that wasn’t always the case.  Or on other networks.

It mirrors what happened across all of daytime television in the late 1990’s-2000’s- except for DAYS the last four soaps all had significantly skewed their storytelling towards the male leads and settled on often misogynistic tones.  Y&R fully became the Victor/Jack show, many female characters were weakened and sacrificed or sidelined.  GH was fully the Sonny/Jason/Carly hour, and Carly was of replaced three times (twice we know the talent would have stayed if they had the same input and a comparable salary to the other two).  DAYS unquestionably belonged to Sami at that time.  Again, learning none of the lessons of how Sex and the City became such a cultural flashpoint and maligning the female characters on their shows.

This was only really apparent in daytime and at CBS primetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • In my usual account on my most used video hosting site with the video title  DAYS 1-8-15 Will & Paul Sex This is an edit I began when I was first teaching myself to edit & at that time I couldn't make it do what I wanted it to do. I pulled it up & finished it this morning. 
    • Or Megan is shot by mobsters as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy