Jump to content

Y&R: TV Guide Confirms JG is out and his replacement!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 257
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

LOL. Some recent quotes:

By the way--Shirl is really struck by how much Adam looks like a young Peter Bergman. (Not identical, but they favor each other).

So, she is wondering if there is ANY way--during one of Victor and Hope's downtimes, when Jack was a close friend to Hope, if they could have remotely conceived Adam together. It is a retcon, but it WOULD be delish. Surprisingly, Shirl seems to be in favor of the idea. So am I. I warm to it more and more every day.

father_son.jpg

  • Members
Posted

LMAO! :lol: Such disheatening views!

But she has a point: the magic of the old Y&R is irrevocably lost. The past few years were like watching a train plummet off a bridge.

  • Members
Posted

Ah, but of course, you know I didn't paste in my many disagreements with her :-).

Shirl and I tend to go "point for point" for VERY long posts :).

I think, for me, part of it has to do with having no interest in revisiting glory days. As much as I have always loved Y&R, I usually find the old nostalgia clips briefly fun...but not that compelling. They are old. Stylistically and artistically, they represent the past.

So, in that sense, I am excited to see Y&R try to continue to reach for relevance in the modern era.

For example, when Y&R went to HD...I cheered. That was a fundamental investment in keeping the show fresh and technically relevant. (You also know I think the show is just visually beautiful).

When LML brought in faster pacing, more dynamic sets, some interesting and ethnically diverse new performers (back in the day...I thought that Emily O'Brien and Eyal Podell and Adrienne Frantz all had great potential....Eric Steinberg too), HUMOR and dialogue with greater realism...every one of these things seemed to be an improvement to me. Although I didn't like it, I even appreciated the attempt to make the music more up-to-date.

Of course, LML failed (I believe) not because of the above improvements, but because of a cognitive inability (a true frontal lobe dysfunction, IMO) to keep it all together. Thus, the plots became outlandish, the historical accuracy of characters and motivations was loss, some key players were (falsely) squandered. Suddenly the plot lines and character motivations became inconsistent from day to day, and it was clear that quality control had fallen to the wayside. Episode-to-episode variations meant the show no longer sounded "like the show" (to quote Kay Alden).

I truly believe that LML's "renovations" would have updated the show, while keeping its footing in its past, if she simply would have been more capable of keeping the whole package under control. Instead, she delegated too much...and the show fell apart...lost identity...lost connection with its own past.

So, in the later LML regime, the show WAS at risk of derailing.

But that is over now. The show is literally back on track.

I personally like (I am wary, cautious, have few long-term positive expectations) that not all of the stylistic modernizations of the LML era have been cast aside. The younger characters STILL sound different from classic Bell dialogue. The look (Restless Style!) and and pacing is still not as it once was. I applaud the show for trying to (now, more gradually) propel the show into a new era.

I have written elsewhere that shows need to give up this idea of lasting for decades. Indeed, the marketplace seems to be taking care of this excessive longevity problem.

But, as someone whose heart is in Genoa City, I also am far from ready to let it go. To that end, any attempt to keep the show from stagnation (stylistically, narratively, linguistically, production-wise) makes me happy.

[but I am also the guy who applauds P&G for TRYING the Ellen Wheeler GL experiment, even if it was doomed to fail. If we don't try new things, sheer staleness with kill the creative enterprise].

  • Members
Posted

For me, it's actually sad — and I might be totally wrong here since I haven't lurked around the groups for quite some time — that there are so few people discussing soaps there. And no one even speaks about As the World Turns or Guiding Light (God forbid!). It's constantly Y&R, Y&R, Y&R...

I think I might have contradicted my earlier statement in that we should try to get Y&R in the 21st century. But it's not that I want the old Y&R completely, I just want that same quality of storytelling. Which isn't there.

As for the visual aspect, all American soaps are far behind European, Australian and Central/South American ones. They have long ago changed the whole production aspects and look like some primetime shows.

I think she failed because she deeply hated Y&R. And took a job just because of money and the hope that she will be called to write for another soap.

  • Members
Posted

Well, that is partly my fault. The number of correspondents at usenet falls and falls and falls...DonnaB says that is trans-group and international. Message boards and myspace, etc., have supplanted usenet. So what is left there is a shrinking pool of stalwart old folks like me.

Even DonnaB barely posts (there, here) anymore. Roger Newcomb says it is precisely us older folks (he said 50+) who are leaving daytime at the fastest rate. I wonder if that is true. Usenet seems to support it.

The other thing is that ratsc is currently awash in Off Topic (OT) threads...endless...and like weeds, that has kind of overwhelmed the soap discussion.

In terms of posting frequency, I'd say the ranking is more like:

Y&R

ATWT

B&B

GL

But you are correct that Y&R is the leader. In the last few months, I think I have been a main thread starter (and Y&R is my thing)...because so few other threads have been started.

I would say, though, that the general tenor of discussion regarding all the soaps is "disgust"...and that inhibits discussion.

That makes my blood cold.

So you think she was like Gloria Monty. Anti-soap, wanting to turn Y&R into something more like primetime?

I always thought she liked the show and its characters, and tried to make it more relevant. But you may have a good point.

  • Members
Posted

I sort of think she wanted to make her own imprint, to make it more alike to her primetime shows. She never really cared and I get the feeling she was bored to death watching it while they payed her to do so as a consultant. At that point, she probably realised she wouldn't know how to write for it but why would she give up on the money? So she decided to accept the HW position.

I think she likes daytime, only not Y&R. Possibly she even had a subconscious wish to destroy the soap she was so jealous of.

I'm making all this stuff up, but I fear it might be true.

Spot on!

  • Members
Posted

The JFP thread got me thinking - it appears that now Rauch is the most distinguished EP in daytime history. He's EP-ed P&G soaps, an ABC soap, and now a Sony/Bell soap.

JFP's EP-ed all types of soaps, with the exception of a Sony/Bell soap.

  • Members
Posted

SHOUT MODE ON:

AND IF I HAVE MY WAY, JFP WILL NEVER GET HER HANDS ON A BELL SOAP.

Sometimes, things must be said very loudly, so that the universe can clearly hear....

  • Members
Posted

I'm confused. Didn't she say in an interview that she had never seen Y&R before getting hired? Or am I just making that up?

  • Members
Posted

She did say that she only started watching it when she was hired to consult. :rolleyes:

But then she said she interviewed the actors and took them out to dinner to find out more about their characters, and some praised her for that. :rolleyes:

  • Members
Posted

I thought all those dinner/lunch meetings sounded cool...like she really wanted to get into the heads and history of the characters.

Apparently this was nothing but smoke and mirrors.

But it DID seem to keep the actors on her side for quite some time.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think he ever gained much traction on GH. He should have stayed with The Doctors. Was Mark just a toned-down version of Nick? Were they basically the same character?
    • All I can think of is if a lot of big names were leaving around that time she wanted him back as a stopgap, although I have never seen any real evidence that he was popular with GH viewers.
    • I loved watching Shanice hand Leslie her ass and finally shutting her up. It was so good. I also love Martin & Smitty's family.  Anita has to have some sort of plan giving Leslie the tickets to mail for Winterfest. She has to be setting her up for a fall. It's pretty obvious to me Vernon is not cheating with Sharon. I think Sharon is helping him with his terrible singing voice for Winterfest. I still believe Bill & Dani are endgame but I love Dani & Andre too. I am definitely enjoying this story. And making Hayley a black widow is a nice twist.
    • Sorry for the spam. Wasn't sure where to put this, it's from Tony Geary's husband's IG. Tony watching Genie and Maurice on Mo's show.
    • This show is really trundling along BTW. When is someone going to show up to slit Beastmaster's throat or crack the whip on metrosexual Sidwell? (BTW, openly presenting this cheery bon vivant as casually bisexual would at least be something vaguely diverting.) At least kill Brennan by year's end. I'm bored.
    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy