Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the week of July 14th-18th


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

SB does the same facial expression regardless of what the scene entails. So in reference to his skill he does the same things over and over again regardless of it being a dramatic or comedic situation.

He is actually one of the few things keeping my interest in this show.

The Jasam fanbase was decimated the moment they ruined Sam's character for Laison. Jason and Robin are long since dead and Laison has been on perpetual stand by for the last few months or so... Jason has no story. I don't even mean the fact that he has no story of significance. I mean that he has No. Story. He is just a tacky add on to the Carly/Sonny tug of war and the teens murder storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It wasn't all that bad for me I mean there were many scenes I enjoyed watching

but the dialog is what I have issues with

its something missing many segments, they seem to say much of the same thing. I noticed the repetition they kept

hammering it in repeating the word "Power" in dialog.

A new week a new character that I don't care about. I enjoyed the return of "Jasper Jax" as a long time fan

the suave debonair International Financier is shining through again

As a Kirsten fan it was hard to watch her with Spinelli. I like them better as friends the romance angle doesnt work for me but they have fans

so good for them. I enjoy her acting so whatever.

Jason doesn't seem like a mob lord but a babysitter he's all over the place. Where are his henchmen and he lives in PH2 not 3

unless he moved....I didn't even notice the Emmy deal I have to watch the marathon

I like the acting dynamics of Bruce Weitz/Steve Macht/Rick Hearst/SJB good acting goes down for me.

Enjoyed Nik, I like his dialog esp in scenes w/Alexis.

Lulu is when I started watching old eppys of the Tudors couldn't take it. I didn't know her family

has a history of crazy (Maxi) so that surprised me...Laura went boinkers but that is one.

Not interested in any new mobster right now Russian or otherwise. Anna I don't like or dislike; I just don't

care one way or the other. Enjoy Noah immensely I guess he's stuck with Anna

(what a surprise). I liked Sonny he made a lot of sense for me this week. Kate lost a point with me

I like her but why would she "assume" Jax would be seen with her for some game w/the press

he's a married man. Bad idea but he put her in check good move.

This summer its no big deal. Its not like I'm looking for my remote;

now, its like I missed it, oh well. I liked the other week when they had lots of flowers

in their settings it was fresh and colorful...

For me,

I get so tired of " Sam was ruined because of Liason when Jason/Elizabeth knew each other before this character even came to Port Chuck

the Sam character was not ruined for Liason; geeze she did that all on her own she came on a conartist, hooker, marrying men for money so what does that have to do with Elizabeth? oh and thief.

what is this silly fable that Liason ruined her character? She was ruined when she flipped from Jax to Stumpy didnt know who her baby daddy

was because she shagged two men in one night then Jason stepped up to claim Sonny's kid which made it seem like she had three lovers who

could have been the daddy this was "before" Elizabeth Webber and Jason Morgan. (and her years of blubbering) all women are poorly scribed with few

exceptions on this show...Sam is no different than all the others who have been thrown under a bus they rotate (this one then that one).

Peekabootwo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
    • Why do I feel like (or remember possible

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) Mark Dante operated on Jeff? Also, I was under the impression that Jeff shot himself accidentally. In his drunken stupor he saw Rick and Monica together and he thought hevwas shooting at them.
    • A number of errors in the above article. You wonder how with all that research,how  they slipped through. I think they are conflating Women Alone with Lonely Women. I have never read anything of a serial called Women Alone. However,I am prepared to be proven wrong.   It seems Irna actually WAS interested in TV soaps as witnessed by These Are My Children airing in 1949 on NBC in the early days of TV.   I don't believe that was reluctance, rather simply good business sense as radio's dominance began to wane.   Inferring that was somehow connected to Irna who was off that show 10 years prior.   Again inferring that Phillips leaving 6 years prior had some connection to the eventual cancellation.     Again these two events are in fact one. Irna left ATWT only once in 1970 and returned in 72. She was not working on another P&G show at the time. So either she brought the ratings up or they dipped, depending on which above account you believe   Untrue. A World Apart debuted 5 years after she left AW. And AWA aired longer than a few months. Over a year in fact.   I believe Orin Tovrov was the writer. Irna was not involved in the creation of this show. And no mention of Masquerade an Irna serial  which was on air around this time.   TBD finished in 1962. As we see over and over, these inaccuracies are published and accepted as fact.
    • YES! While I objectively found the writing on RH (particularly during its first few years and then again in its final days) to be excellent, so many of the principle characters were unpleasant, and totally turned me off. I could never settle down and become emotionally involved with a group of people who grated on my nerves.
    • Ugh now we get a Emmerdale and Corrie crossover soon. ugh.. How desperate 
    • This show is definitely not one to deserve the axe.  especially the New Year’s Eve episode was crazy wild! there is a place where u can download nearly all episodes from October 2019 til today. But they don’t accept new people. https://youtu.be/aD-IXEJjymU?si=19wtpwthSNYOe-4y   this is from this years winter break when the returned. I loved it
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy