Jump to content

The Doctors


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

I don't think Lipton's dialogue was very good on 'The Doctors,' but it was passable. I did like his headwriting on 'Capitol' in the mid-80s...he was the show's final head scribe during its last year. Maybe because they knew it was ending and wanted to go out with a bang...his last three months on 'Capitol' were extraordinary. So maybe he was a guy who excelled at plotting and not exactly with the day to day scripting.

Edited by JarrodMFiresofLove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I am new to this board and happy to be here.   I actually started watched the Doctors around 1978 with my grandmother and continued till its end in 1982.   I started watching the Retro shows when they were in 1974.  It's fascinating to watch the evolution of a soap opera to its present form.  I know a little bit about the behind-the-scenes as I had some friends who acted on OLTL.   TD had some really natural dialogue and strong acting, although there are a few really poor contributors e.g., Steve Aldrich.   He underplayed every emotion to the point of almost sleepwalking through the role.

 

Edited by MonaCroft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing I've wanted to ask is how long do these opening credits stay the same? I know there were different openings later on. Does Jeff Young update how the credits look, or does that happen with the next producer?

 

Also, do people like James Pritchett and Dave O'Brien continue to get special billing at the end of each episode or does the show do away with that later?

Edited by JarrodMFiresofLove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes, most likely. Have you seen a lot of episodes at the Paley Center? I always wonder why certain ones are available for viewing and others are not. Are they chosen at random, or maybe the Paley Center is trying to present more groundbreaking episodes from the series.

Edited by JarrodMFiresofLove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Because you are posting these things like they are true facts.  And they aren't. But whatever, Donna, you will just keep doing you.   Most people actually are trying to talk about GH in this thread.  Not random twitter/facebook/internet rumors you bring here.  I am just wasting my time even responding.    
    • This is a common theme with long running actors and preposterous storylines. Firstly they may relish the chance to play something different after years as that charcter. Secondly, no matter how dumb the plot it keeps them frontburner and valued to the show and the audience. Thirdly, as VW stated in the end they don't have the power to dictate story and too much complaining can backfire and set them up in a negative light. Not a good position to be in with your employers. So they just buckle up and give it their all or act out the script till it's over.
    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy