Jump to content

Neighbours: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Always better when Haz and Terese/Paul/Toadie/Mel aren't the focus.

I think this was one of the show's best weeks since its return, even better because this was just an ordinary week, no big stunts. 

Almost the entire cast had storyline, which meant less of the padding and isolation that has hurt a lot of the revival. Leo's business struggles had ripple effects for so many people. Holly is still just a plot device, but this was probably the best use of her so far in that role, helped by getting to see her with Karl and by the character acknowledging how crazy her actions were. 

It was great to see Krista finally get to have some manipulative, scheming moments, after so often just suffering or being in support. Majella Davis is one of the best hires the new show has made and so often she's taken for granted.

Depressing as that dungeon-like Eirini Rising set is, the brief Harold scenes add a certain depth to the show for me due to the focus on his ageing and readjustment. There was a lot of focus on letting go, getting older, and regrets through the whole week, with Aaron, Susan, Vic, Harold, Karl, all of which came across as thoughtful and not melodramatic. This also served as a balance to the younger set of JJ, Nell and Dex, giving the show a real multi-generational sense. 

There were some nice friendship moments too, which Neighbours is generally good at, but I noticed more than usual this week - Haz and Harold, Haz and JJ, Wendy and Terese. This was probably Haz's best week since the first few weeks of the revival.

I was also glad to finally see movement in the Jane/Mike story. Jane sitting alone in the dress shop struggling through sorrow and doubt on what was meant to be one of the happiest days of her life was some of the best work Annie Jones has done on the show. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I am a bit disappointed if that's Sky's return done and dusted already. There are a lot of missed opportunities. She never interacted with Melanie (who hadn't returned yet last time she was back in 2020) and we heard absolutely nothing about Sky's life. I was hoping they'd sort out the mess they'd made of her last return as a detective, and fill us in on whether she'd had a career change, but there was nothing about that. We also heard nothing about Scotty, or her third child, or whether she had any more children, or what their names might be. We did hear that Kerry's now in Year 12, and it was a pleasant surprise that she hadn't been SORASed (speaking of which, I'm curious as to why her age has remained consistent, and I'm wondering if Steph McIntosh had any input into the script, as I'm curious about why the writers would keep her that age even if I agreed with the decision).

I do think this is symptomatic of The Powers That Be not quite getting it right when it comes to returnees. Sky is a huge, iconic character, and she comes back for a B storyline with Harold, is gone within 2 episodes and we hear nothing about her life. Sky's return should be a huge deal, as apart from Izzy, she's the only character from that 2000s era who I'd consider to be an iconic character.

Steph McIntosh hints that she'd be up for appearing more according to her BTS video on the Neighbours socials, and it does indicate somewhat a lack of forward planning that the producers introduced the Varga-Murphys with lesbian mums, when we could potentially have had Sky and Lana return with their own family. I don't really see room for 2 lesbian families, as well as Nicolette (and currently Kiri on screen). They couldn't exactly split Sky and Lana up, as that would anger a lot of fans (I'd accept it, but I think many wouldn't). I guess the most we can hope for is that Sky continues to make appearances, and more substantial ones at that, where she's given some characterisation and we actually learn about her life. Maybe she could bring Kerry, Scotty, her other child(ren) when she returns down the line, as the blink and you'll miss it return doesn't really do justice to such an iconic return.

I'm actually wondering if there are many old-school writers around at the moment? Was it a new writer who wrote that Harold gun blunder, as I don't understand how that script got through the script editors untouched, and to be honest I'm a little surprised Ian and Steph didn't object to it. The script editing process has been a bit poor/lacklustre recently, with that gun line, and the Hugo suggesting Terese's fish name could be Goldfish, when that's already taken by Georgia.

Ultimately, if they're going to do these returns for big, iconic characters, there needs to be adequate consideration given to that returning character themselves. I know Harold's a big, iconic character, but Sky is too, and deserves that recognition. The current team have never seemed to really understand/recognise Sky as a character though, given how she was written in 2020 and this time.

I still think it was worth it for that lovely Harold/Sky scene in the cafe, which was so heartwarming. I'd never have thought a year or two ago that we'd even get more Harold/Sky scenes. But yeah, I hope they do better by Sky's character somehow going forward. And the producers really need to think about how the show all fits together and the overall plan, as they can be a bit gung-ho with their ideas, but I wonder if anyone looks at an overall plan in terms of the cast demographics and long-term plan.

Sky is where my online username comes from.

Edited by Skylover
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Skylover Enjoyed reading your thoughts. There are some episodes which seem to suggest awareness of the past (like Harold's scenes with JJ about his tuba) but this seemed to have noticeable errors. 

I'm not surprised at the lack of interest in giving Melanie that moment, as she has gotten poor material and a lack of followup - I can't even remember if she ever mentioned Sharon after Sharon's appearances early in the revival. 

I do remember some fans recently, on DS, talking about how contrived the writing was for Sky in 2020 (namely, getting her together when Lana).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really like Harold and JJ scenes. I'm hoping they introduce one of Harold's great grandchildren as a regular character now Harold's back, and I'm wondering if the fact Kerry was mentioned as being in Year 12 means she might be back soon to attend Eden Hills uni as a permanent character.

Yeah, I think I like Sky and Boyd together best. The Sky/Lana story from 2004 is what originally got me into Neighbours as a big fan, but at the time, Sky showed minimal reciprocal romantic interest in Lana. I think she wouldn't have been the type to shy away from pursuing a lesbian relationship if she wanted to, as she never really was the conforming type. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

This is very nicely made by the fan, but the scene itself is also touching. Kudos to Guy Pearce for being willing to return for brief appearances and allowing the Jane and Mike love story to wrap up with dignity. 

@Vee I know you are not on current episodes, but you may enjoy watching this scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy