Jump to content

EastEnders: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Tanya is NOT Angie. Tanya would turn her nose up at Angie and Angie would throw a drink in that smug face. I guess my time enjoying Max will be winding down.

I wonder who Heather's boyfriend will be. Probably someone like Patrick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Charlotte at Walford Web said that Kirkwood was asked in Inside Soap yesterday about the possibility of bringing Sharon back.

He said with Ronnie leaving, "There is certainly a tragic heroine shaped role just waiting to be filled."

Don't know if that's just a tease and nothing will come out of it or if he's seriously considering it. But please, Sharon is more than just an average "tragic heroine." A lot of tragic stuff happened in her life yes, but she's managed to transcend a lot of it. Plus she has strong relationships with Phil, Ian, Pat, etc, and seeing her as mother would bring a newer element to the character.

They can even explore Sharon's biological family again, and recast Vicki while they're at it. Too bad Michelle will never be coming back since Sue Tully is done with acting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is what Bryan said

Q Will the Mitchell family stay at the centre of the action in Albert Square?

"Of course! The Mitchell's are absolutely key to EastEnders, and I'm very pleased with the way they've evolved as a clan since Peggy's departure. It's given Phil a new lease of life - he's now king of the square rather than a slightly weird son who lives with his mum! with King Phil and Queen Shirley and the two brilliant boys, Jay and Ben, we now have material for years and years to come."

Q I've noticed Janine and Max have chemistry - would they ever get together?

" I clocked their scenes at Christmas too - the ones about the recording of Stacey Branning - and thought, 'Hello'. Janine and Max are both brilliant characters and not dissimilar, so sparks would fly if they got together. There are no plans for them to be paired up, but you never know in Walford. After the stories she's had lately, it's time for Janine to have some fun, I think. We've got Margaret Tyzack with us now, filming her first scenes as Janine's wicked granny Lydia Simmonds. I reckon it's a meeting of the minds - and a glimpse into the future for Janine!"

Q Could Yesef turn out to be Syed's dad in the end?

" That's a good question! it's no secret Yusef was around before Massood was on the scene - and I think the fact that Zainab is such a hypocrite makes her very interesting. Yusef is a charcter who brings an enigmatic quality both to the show and the family - and all the Massood's will feel his presence in the months to come."

Q Will Syed's ex Amira ever return?

" Well Christian and Syed have recently embarked on a mission to have a child, and Amira's out there with Syed's baby - so the possibilities are there."

Q Will Sharon Rickman ever be back in the square?

" I think Letitia Dean, who played Sharon, is one of the true icons of EastEnders. And with Samantha Womack departing, there's certainly a tragic heroine - shaped hole that's waiting to be filled."

Q I love fatboy! Do you guys love him as well?

" Yes! What I love most about him is that he's just a decent suburban lad behind the 'rude boy' exterior. When Ricky Norwood started with us, I was stunned at the vitriol he recieved - we were inundated with complaints. But all the big charcters in soap history - such as the Slater's and Corrie's Battersbys - have had that initial reaction, so I was quietly confident that the audience would learn to love Fatboy. There's a proper love story on the way for him that will pull at the viewer's heart strings too."

Q Do you use audience feedback to help you decide how plots should develop?

" We're always listening to the audience opinion at EastEnders. We've got to trust our instincts, but we'll respond to whether a story is working or an actor is going down well or not. Fatboy is an interesting example - we stuck to our belief that we were right and that the audience would eventually love him. With the baby - swap story, we were surprised by the reaction - and I think we were right to make the changes that we have.

Q Will Hev ever find a decent fella?

" Heather will find love with a mystery man whose identity will shock everyone! You might even know him already.

Q Do actors ever contribute to their plots, and has anyone ever been unhappy with a particular storyline they've been given?

" We have a very talented story team at EastEnders that leads the process. But actors know their characters better than anyone, and I'm always open to suggestions from them."

Q Would you ever change the themne tune?

" No, absolutely not - EastEnders has the best theme tune on telly! it was changed disastrously in 1993 and became a bit jazzy. But it was swiftly changed back and is going to remain as it is."

Q Roxy seems very taken with Michael - but is it a romance she'll soon regret?

"Michael bears a startling resemblance to Roxy's late dad Archie in the way he approaches life and treats people. Roxy's a little girl lost and Michael could be the worst possible man for her. But how long will it take her to realise that?"

Edited by dannigold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • From what I just recently watched, they were setting her up to go into future stories. She was Emmy nomination worthy in the material I saw. If some viewers did not like her, the character could have been rehabilitated after that sick storyline. It feels like they destroyed a character for fun and then tossed her to the curb. Spencer had chemistry with everyone. I'm just retroactively angry on Spencer's behalf. 
    • CBS was back in third place in 1994/95. That was the season CBS lost NFL broadcasting rights which also cost them several established affiliates in major media markets. 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived. 1995/96 CBS was trying to be young and cool to compete with NBC and Fox, but it was an epic failure and CBS was once again in third place.
    • I tend to think that Chad will actually listen to Jen (this time). And that will be the next stumbling block in their relationship, which will open the possibilities for Cat to seek another member of their love triangle... To iterate my earlier thought, I am also not a fan of the person Melissa Reeves, but the character of Jennifer looks so chic this week, especially in comparison to Hope (and Gabi).  That blunt haircut is a winner.   
    • I think Cheryl was essentially replaced by Josie, and it seems likely that Lemay wanted to bring the Frames back into the picture and for a variety of reasons that it would be McKinnons who would make way for them. Cheryl didn't really get many layers -- she was pretty and kind and sweet and faded into the background so that Scott could participate in the AIDS storyline with Dawn. Looking at the AWHP, other than (not very) shockingly being in love with her mother's adopted son Scott, Cheryl apparently went out with Sam and flirted with much-too-old-for-her John Hudson and MJ's ex-boyfriend/pimp Chad. I know MJ told Mary that she had been a prostitute, but did she tell Cheryl and did she tell anyone about Chad's pimping?   
    • I feel the same way about Melissa Reeves' Jennifer. She just makes the show feel like home by her presence alone. I am perfectly okay with them coming in every once and awhile, which probably fits Reeves' schedule better anyway. Their connections to Salem are still there: JJ, the grandkids, Jack still owning half of The Spectator ... they're perfect recurring characters. All this talk of Jennifer being in the wrong regarding Cat is absurd. Jennifer is not being villainized in any way, shape, or form, she's just being allowed to actually be human, which adds odds to the obstacle of Chad and Cat eventually getting together. All inner conflict. Keep it coming!
    • Hahaha. Jean Hackney, Angelica Nero, and the Falcon Crest henchwomen were all straight out of a James Bond movie.
    • My hunch is what you've described. JFP is likely back working on transitioning the show to a new studio and embracing new technology for its production model.
    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
    • It's a lesson to never be loyal because once your use is up, you're shown the door. MSW was the only bright spot for CBS for awhile, and once they were back on top... they promptly sabotaged the show as a repayment for all that the show had done for the network.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy