Jump to content

Daytime Emmy Ratings


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Wow, I thought for sure it would have been because of the ABC shut out. I know a lot of people who didn't watch because of the CBS domination in nominations.

Why are they always on Friday anyway? Seems like Sunday would be a better day.

  • Members
Posted

That is such horsesh*t and you know it, people did not tune out because of CBS dominations in nominations. It was the most illogical statement I've read all weekend.

Here is why Daytime Emmys was higher last year which aired on CBS: the telecast began airing at 9pm not 8pm unlike ABC. CBS aired a primetime special of "The Price Is Right" at 8pm to lead into the Emmy telecast which is a brillant scheduling move unlike ABC which had nothing except for some Canadian reject soap about hockey players & bimbos airing after the Emmys. If Daytime Emmys were to be aired during the summer, you always air it later in the evening not at 8pm because people are outside enjoying the weather and it's still light out.

I remember in the early 90s when NBC aired the Daytime Emmys, they aired one of their soaps in a primetime edition of "Days of Our Lives" or "Another World" right before the Emmy telecast which was ultra-cool. So what did ABC network had to offer????? Nothing, and I mean NOTHING except for a premium digital cable channel called SoapNet which only less than 2.0 million household are subscribed in the entire country. SoapNet aired their "red-carpet" event for 2 hours before the Daytime Emmy telecast which does NOTHING for the ratings. I thought last year's red carpet host Chandra Wilson from Grey's Anatomy did wonders because she was a fan except we got RPG and RB from AMC who seemed amateurish to be hosting (no personal attack to RPG/RB intended). If I was Brian Frons to get someone to do red-carpet for daytime, I would get a well-known primetime star who loves soaps or a well-known comedian Drew Carey or Kathy Griffin.

The whole ABC Emmy telecast missed out on lack of Memoriam, too much of Cameron Mathison, bad set up in tables which is not working (trying to be like Golden Globes), lack of showing actors/actresses' nominated scenes, lack of premiere musician who could headline the Emmys, focusing on this "passing-around-the-digital-camera" was a bit cheesey, no Game Show or host categories, the fans were way in the back during the this year's event whereas last year they were in the front, and lack of soaps' nominated scenes.

Bottom line is, the Daytime Emmys telecast was used for three things only (Brian Frons knows this!): 1) promo for SoapNet cable channel; 2) promo for MVP, and 3) promo for GH: Night Shift 2; which you couldn't avoid during the entire 2-hour event. No wonder MVP stunk in the ratings because NOT EVERYONE WANTS SOAPNET OR CAN SUBSCRIBE, so if you ram SoapNet promo in people's throat they will utlimately tune out not because of CBS dominations in nominations. Duh!

  • Members
Posted

I highly doubt the ABC shut-out had anything to with it. The average person tuning into the daytime emmys doesn't even know who is nominated ahead of time like we do. They also probably don't even know what's a CBS show versus an ABC show.

My guess is that the daytime emmys got such bad ratings because they are the daytime emmys.

  • Members
Posted

I agree, and Friday has never been a strong day for ABC PERIOD. The last time ABC hosted, the show hit another all time low.

Daytime Emmy ratings have been lower and lower each year for a deacade now, last year's CBS broadcast was different though and was actually up from the previous year.

  • Members
Posted

I partly think that many soap fans who would normally tune in said forget it because of how horrible the nominations were. Soap ratings are down and if they watched the terrible broadcast CBS put all last year they probably didn't want to sit through that again.

  • Members
Posted

I am not surprised. The show was very dull. I agree that the show should have started an hour later like CBS did last year. I'm glad it will be back on CBS next year. Dont even get me started on MVP. :lol:

  • Members
Posted

>>That is such horsesh*t and you know it, people did not tune out because of CBS dominations in nominations. It was the most illogical statement I've read all weekend. <<

You want to see illogical statements about the Emmys? Go to the Van Hansis board. I can't post there because I say the truth, but a buddy has been sending me their postings. They claim that Van didn't win because of homophobia!! WTF??? THAT is illogical.

  • Members
Posted

I totally agree, let's face it Van Hansis is a good actor and mighty cute I might add, but he made a mistake in his selection of the Emmy reel (Van Hansis KNOWS HE MADE A MISTAKE). GL's Tom Pelphrey is good and by far probably the best actor to hit daytime in over a decade which many says he's the next Tony Geary for the generation. This was definetly Tom's year to win.

  • Members
Posted

the emmys were horrid. it was such a piss poor manages production. everyhting from the red carpet to the show itself.

abc sucks at doing this.

cbs should just host it everyyear. they also are much smarter about the sch. using TPIR as a lead in for example.

but honestly - what was there to tune in for on the emmys?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Again, Bernau's illness impacted that. It's pretty obvious Pilon was always meant to be temporary. I read an article from that period that said he was working on both Ryan's Hope and GL at the same time. So he wasn't on contract for either show. (Maybe that explains somewhat why his performance was so low energy, because he was overworked doing two soaps). Later, they put him in the opening and in commercials for the show. That must have been because they were certain Bernau was not returning. Around that time, they approached Zaslow about being the permanent replacement for Bernau. He turned them down and suggested coming back as Roger. Pilon stayed so they could re-introduce Roger and write an exit for Alan. I'm guessing if MZ had not wanted to come back, they would have had no choice but to keep Pilon (which I don't think they wanted, or maybe Pilon wasn't interested) or send out a casting call for a new Alan. I think they wanted to avoid that because they were really determined not to let the nature of Bernau's illness to become public knowledge. At this point, they were still keepin up the fiction that he was going to return even while this stuff was happening BTS. Yeah, it seems crazy now, but people forget how stigmatized AIDS was back then. I'm convinced the idea to ask Zaslow to take the role came about so they could replace Bernau as quietly as possible. Everyone would have been so surprised it would have taken the focus off Bernau not returning. It makes a kind of twisted sense. Still, thank goodness Zazlow said no and they said yes to his suggestion to return as Roger. The way everything worked out gave GL a few more strong years. I guess it's the nature of soaps, you never know what things in real like will end up strongly impacting the show, both negatively and positively.
    • I truly do not understand why this has not happened. It's so un-Carly-like not have confronted Joss already. 
    • He definitely had it going on back in the day
    • I have long given up on logic and Mayor Laura Collins! It makes about as much sense as Luke being elected mayor over Lee Baldwin in the 80’s, maybe even less sense. She committed manslaughter as a teenager, was involved with a mobster (I guess credit for them taking Smith down), had a shoot out in her home and killed another mobster in self defense, thought she bludgeoned her stepfather to death, then was catatonic for years. Her current husband had a twin that was a serial killer, had his own breakdown that threatened lives, and most recently hid his brother for treatment and that allowed Ryan to escape and kill again. And had hook killer Esme as a houseguest and is raising her child. I don’t care for Sonny anymore but their relationship is just another thing that involves suspension of belief to watch the show. I wish someone on this show would remind these adults that they used to pull way worse stuff than this! I would love a scene where Laura is sitting with Lulu and tells her while she is not happy this is nothing compared to what she got up to when she was young, and maybe even some understanding that she would also do stupid stuff if she believed in the cause. Olivia reminding Dante that he was wild as a teen and this isn’t that. Felicia reminding Anna that they were being shot at when pretty close to Emma’s age. These characterizations are just so basic. Have some fun with the actual history of the show. That kind of wink would mean more to me than just name dropping some random fact.
    • There are no dumb questions here, we've all known each other long enough to fill in information without shaming each other.  We want you to be happy @carolineg.  Your POV as one of the few women here is vital. So, please, I hope you never feel as if any question, idea, or opinion is ever silly or stupid.  Your daily reminders about the realities of manicure and menstrual management has become a part of the personality of this thread. As for Hank, while I'm confident there's a plan in place.  It is frustrating that they announce these casting so far in advance that it is tough as an audience and wait it out until the thing happens.  I'm happy they didn't blow it the second Mike was in town, a week after meeting Liam. So, it is a slow burn. And, conveniently, he lets us know when his episodes air. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think his full name is Chadwick.  I remember, back when the previous actor was playing him, someone called him Chadwick a couple of times.  It may have been Stefano.  
    • I didn't like those two sleeping together, but I suuure liked seeing BF in them. Wiggle and all. Just sad about the waxing of the chest.   Same.
    • It’s strange. I wonder if the writers at that time had worked with him somewhere else and had a relationship? That time is murky AF to find info on. Rachel Ames in effect left the show at one point in the early 80’s and she is credited like she was there until JFP. Tristan Rogers also took various contract breaks that were not short, and websites also credit him one long stint from 1981-1992. So many people come and go in short succession in 1982-part of 1983. I know they lost a lot of viewers when Genie left, but the show somehow survived yearly at number one through like sheer force of will.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy