Jump to content

Dena Higley's Blog


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't expect Corday to keep her much longer. Her stories are starting to grow stale and it's only a matter of time before the ratings start dropping again. And once that happens, Corday will come up with another idea to save DAYS and bring on a new head writer, if he hasn't already been grooming Rick Draughton to be the new HW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would give Rick a chance. I guess it couldn't be too much worse. In my opinion, though, there are several decent candidates that could easily write for this show and probably do as good a job, if not better than, Sheffer. After Reilly's first tenure, this show started to flounder because Corday couldn't find a head writer that fit this show. In my opiinion, the show was the best it has been this decade when Brash/Cwigly were at the helm (minus Billie's return and the spaceship).

My preferences...

Peter Brash......He did a good job on Days, and he can put down some dialouge.

Beth Milstein.....Her ability to straighten out this show after Reilly left was incredible, and to be honest, IMHO, I liked her Days better than Hogan's version. She knows the show, pulled former HWs out of the woodwork to assist her, and wrote for couples without pushing them down our throats.

Sheri Anderson....She may take the show too far back and make it feel like 1992 again, BUT...she knows it and would be light years better than Higley. She is also one of the best writers in daytime when it comes to creating new characters. Jack, Frankie, John Black, Kate Roberts to name a few. IF I thought Days had one year left (which it may) I think she'd be the perfect choice to give this show a good, historically honest ending.

Tom Casiello...Not sure on the spelling :P It would never, ever happen, but I love his blog and think he would do very well. Too bad Corday seems to have blinders on and can't pick the true talent out around the writier's table. Thats why I can't trust Draughton.

I can't trust Draughton because Corday hasn't promoted a good writer from his staff since Brash, and before that, never. Anderson was Betty's protege. Reilly was just a cool idea Anderson signed off on. We need a new writer, I just want a proven one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, Dena, Dena, Dena...

Welcome back to the wonderful world of Days of Our Lives. Only this time, you've got a REAL EP in charge. And not someone like Wyman who lets you do whatever the hell you want.

This is the second time she's complained about getting too many notes in her blog. Methinks there's some unrest behind the scenes in Salem. Like nobody saw THAT coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ Oh, I never even thought about Ed Scott being the one to shoot down her ideas. People always assume it's just Corday. With Scott here, he likes to work closely with everyone, so I could see him shooting down a lot of Higley's ideas. However, I wish some of the stuff we're seeing now was shot down. However, it could be a lot worse. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I'm sure that's who it is. Ed comes from the school of Y&R, and Dena... doesn't.

Corday and Higley are way too tight. This is just my speculation (and keep in mind I was *WAY* wrong about AMC and the Spike/Greenlee rewrite, so take this with a grain of salt), but this reeks of Ed Scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe Sami was going to have DID. Marlena would take her on retreats and Sami was lured to the bar by strange men and abused....it doesn't matter if they thought Marlena was dead at the time. It's called taking "creative liberties" :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like there have been a lot of changes at Days, in terms of the day-to-day writing, even for the last few weeks of air shows. Many of us... even Dena defenders... have felt like it's been kind of directionless. And what's interesting is that Dena always HAD a direction at OLTL. The Jen murder leading to Bo and Rex in the gay bar, finding Mark and Colson, and exposing Colson on City Hall steps clearly had direction, build, and you could see the climax. (However poorly written it was, consdiering it was just a plot device to write out three characters they didn't like)

Todd's Scott Peterson story had a definite build to his execution. Hell, even Kelly and Duke's ridiculous affair built to a brilliantly acted reveal at Michael and Marcie's wedding (however stupid it was to kill off a legacy character).

Clearly, DENA KNOWS BUILD.

So what's going on here?

My guess? There are a lot of people with a lot of differing opinions, and this tug-of-war is showing up on screen as ambivalence, indifference and confusion over what they want to build to. The only story that has anyone excited right now is the autism story, and that's just because Dena (conveniently) blogged about it for the last two months, and everyone thinks it'll be great because she's lived it. But other than that? John vs. Philip? Max and his real dad? Nicole just tossing off one-liners to anyone who'll listen, but still with no purpose on the show? None of it seems to be building to anything, and since Dena has clearly shown she understands the basic concept of "build", there's got to be something else going on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm starting to think that maybe she was hired as a way to completely ax Sheffer. But WGA reemed Days because of Fi-core peopleand how Sheffer's firing went down. Maybe she got caught in the fallout from that.. I don't know cause I haven't watched.

The autism story could be good if it is handled accurately. Hopefully this will be done with a lot of influence from Autism speaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Has anyone ever posted January and February 1974? I can't find them in the 'Look Back to 75' thread. Thanks.
    • Did January and February 1974 DSN ever get posted? I can't seem to find it in this thread.
    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy