Jump to content

Santa Barbara Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

As someone in the comments says, was Sophia even around when Ted went to college? Was that just bad continuity? How do you mess that up given how important her absence was to the backstory? 

The gesture of Ted passing the torch (or his car keys) to Greg is funny when you remember Greg wouldn't last much longer and would never be mentioned after he left. I'm still half-surprised they remembered Ted after this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

See there is no right or wrong in this...just a matter of perspective. Fans felt let down as for years she was rubbishing not just her role or the lack of acting skills during the time but Soap operas as a genre (Which was also kinda disrespectful towards her colleagues as they were brilliant in it). But all the reasons you mentioned above are true too and she has a right to be anguished about it.

All I wanna say is, she could have been more diplomatic or understanding of fan emotions associated with the show/genre. she has softened up her stance recently, calling it her training ground (which should have been her line from the start IMO

Please register in order to view this content

). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am glad Wright has softened on the show and I understood her feelings and her youth in the past. But I think if she'd turned up at this it would've become all about her and overshadowed a lot of the longtimers or long-lost performers like Marcy Walker. If she wants to be involved in a future event or retrospective she could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fall 1984 through spring 1985 showed Ted and Laken in the same classroom. They were supposed to be in high school, their senior year. In the fall, Mr. Bottoms played by Ray Walston was their teacher. Perhaps the show was trying to pay homage to the movie Fast Times at Ridgemont High by getting Ray Walston? In the spring, their teacher was the pointless character Jackie Parks, friend of Amy Perkins. The initial idea seemed to be that Ted and Jackie might eventually hook up somehow, but that never happened and she was dropped, disappearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't fault Wright for feeling negatively about the show to be honest - it must be frustrating to get a shot at doing movies only to have that momentum taken out because of a restrictive contract. It was also hard to transition from television to doing movies back in the day and I'm sure she got a lot of frowned noses when the subject of coming from a soap come up. 

I agree with @Vee that it would've been inappropriate for her to show up at the reunion since it would become all about Robin Wright re-visiting her soap days. There's a time and place for her to talk about Santa Barbara but a cosy event like this is probably not one of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Totally agree with your point of view.

I know some people here defend those soap opera contracts and say that Robin Wright had to accept everything she was thrown because she had contract obligations.

But those contracts seem so unfair according to John Allen Nelson. In 1987 John Allen Nelson said: “I was hired for Santa Barbara in June 1984. I signed a two year and a half contract. But that does not have a lot of sense for the actor, who must respect the terms of it, whereas the producer can put an end to it when he wishes it. In fact, this contract is a protection for the producer, since the actor cannot retract.”

Also, I understand all her frustrations especially because she was a 18-20 years old girl beginning her career. She had to turned down the leading roles in ‘Weird Science’, ‘Dirty Dancing’ and she almost lose ‘The Princess bride’ because of her Santa Barbara obligations.

I cannot blame her.

If I was a director or a writer, and I’m offered to write or direct a big movie, and I cannot do it because I have to be on a soap opera (which is the lowest point of an actor according to the industry, not my opinion but that's what they think), I will be also very disappointed.

Think of Zendaya or Jacob Elordi. The third season of ‘Euphoria’ is not being made because they have many bigger offers in bigger projects.

Of course, some soap opera fans will always defend the soap opera instead on putting on the actors shoes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely spot on.....glad she did not attend, it was a cosy reunion for the actors/ fans and would have been difficult anyways for her to attend (considering stars have their own entourage).. Love her as an actress though, really talented and beautiful. As mentioned here, there is a time and place for everything and this was not it.

Also, loved how the reunion was about all the old timers on the show and of course (Ahem!) especially Marcy. She was obviously the toast of everyone's eyes (deservedly) since she has been out of the limelight for so long.

Don't know what pushed her to come (I know she did not go for the AMC one), but sure am glad we got to see her there.

Edited by MarcyWalkerFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is, allegedly, actually being made after all last I checked, but given the BTS drama I'll believe it when I see it. I wouldn't be shocked if it turns into some late-stage Three's Company situation with Suzanne Somers filming alone without some of the key crew/showrunner, lol. But that's way OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Saying that Robin was disadvantaged due to her Santa Barbara commitments is disingenuous.

She agreed to the contract and it's provisions.

If she was interested in pursuing other roles, then agreeing to a soap was not the wisest choice.

That's why many young actors didn't go that route.

I think back to Tom Selleck for example, who was recurring on Y&R because he wouldn't sign a contract, knowing it would be restrictive and he really wanted a primetime career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Robin Wright has been very honest about why she took the work: she had quit the industry, due to failed auditions, and moved to Hawaii and once she landed, she was offered the two-year deal of Kelly Capwell and immediately flew back. Clearly, she saw it as an "in" to put something on a résumé besides modeling gigs. I can't blame her for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/shortland-street-fears-speculation-grows-about-shows-future-amid-industry-struggles/T2GECWXTI5AD3AMEV46YYYUE6E/ Still a big cloud over whether the show will get another year.
    • I had hoped they'd pair her with Michael Knight. They had a nice chemistry and he's been one of the better random castings on GH. When it comes to Gio, I found the scenes with Dante to be overdone. It's obvious they're trying to set up conflict for the reveal but I don't think that was needed. It actually made me less excited for the reveal and killed any interest I had in Dante and Gio forming a bond.
    • He also lost the woman he was going to marry, under very sudden circumstances. They are probably surprised Rena has wanted to stay. I think Lois works OK in her current capacity, if they allowed her to have more of a point of view, a bit more life of her own, and not just the reason for Gio's paternity being hidden. The character always felt very thin to me and on paper this dynamic with Tracy, Brook Lyn, Gio, visits from Gloria could be better for her than how overly centered she was on the canvas the first time around. But as of now she could be better used.  Somehow the show that was revived due to supercouples seems completely alien to romance. The older cast has this hardest but even with tiers who are younger or middle-aged, they've really dragged their feet about Liz and Lucky, they have contorted themselves in trying to figure out how to pair a man with Joss, Kai and Trina barely get focus...and others I struggle to remember. They also blew up Sasha/Cody so now I guess we're meant to be waiting to see if she finds true love with Jason? The show is so hesitant and when you are this hesitant it means you are incapable of writing romance.
    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy though. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, early 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy