Jump to content

Santa Barbara Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Members

When eden was presumed dead..didn't CC want to groom Kelly to work at Capwell?  Didnt she mention something about art..or design?

 

And oddly, EileenDavidson's take on Kelly reminded me more of Eden.  I would have just had her be an Eden recast... couldn't have been worse..imho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I don't recall about CC/Kelly re: Capwell Enterprises, but it's entirely possible. As for Eileen as a recast Eden, that would have been considered mutiny for fans. Recasting Kelly at that juncture was totally unnecessary, as Carrington Garland had proved herself popular with the audience. I just don't think Eileen was right for the show, and that's not any reflection on her as an actress. She was great as Ashley and Kristen. It's not just Cruz/A - I don't think she had chemistry with any of the Capwells, either. She was just the wrong fit on a show that was already beyond repair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

As I said, I think TPTB realized they goofed with ED as Kelly, so Katrina was brought on to try to redo the Kelly/Eden dynamic. Alas, it failed miserably. I also recall reading the Dobsons first wanted Mason to fall for Katrina, too, to be attracted to her goodness and innocence a la Mary, another mistake by the show no one could ever fix. (And I am a huge Mason/Julia fan, but I know that killing Mary always left a black mark.) I feel bad for saying this, but when the Dobsons returned, it was as if they could not accept their characters had gone on without them and had grown and/or changed, so they wanted to reset the show back to 1986 or so, and that just wasn't going to ever happen. Hence their second stint being pretty much a disaster, maybe minus the 1991 Capwell Dinner.

 

And I realize Eileen Davidson is popular around the board, but I recall her inaugural interview in the now-defunct Soap Opera Weekly magazine after being cast as Kelly left a sour taste in my mouth as she disparaged the character, saying now that she had the role, Kelly's IQ points would go up. That did not sit well with me. So, in a perverse sort of way, maybe karma came back and got her, because she really didn't do so well in that role.

 

The show had a gem in Carrington Garland and cutting her loose for a "name" to desperately save the show will always be yet another black mark.

Edited by Wendy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My recollection is that Cassie and her four musketeers was a classic example of a solid idea that was poorly executed.  The story of Mary/Mason had already established that there was an orphanage that CC patronized because the sisters had a side business as nannies for the Capwell kids.  So, an umbrella story about the other children who grew up in the orphanage seems like a good idea.  Stephen was tied to Sophia because he was directing her life story.  Derek and Craig were in a triangle with Kelly.  And Ethan was the new district attorney which put him at odds with Julia and Mason. 

 

There was even an intriguing mystery when the story started that the audience didn't know why these men were connected or who the lady was that they were all protecting.

 

John Conboy was producing and Sheri Anderson quit as the writer just as the story was starting.  First mistake, one of the musketeers was cast with Leigh McCloskey who had just played Eden's rapist Zach.  Then, Richard Hatch who played Stephen had to be recast.  Then, right before the culmination of the plot Terry Lester left as Mason and was recast with Gordon Thompson because someone "forgot" to renew his contract.  Finally, the Dobsons win their lawsuit and return to the show.  By the 18th trip back to the Capwell tunnel, when the show finally got to the exposition of why the men were avenging Cassie's honor, most of the characters had been recast.  There were no opportunities for the show to use flashbacks to explain the plot because everyone had a new face.   So, one week Stephen is accusing Cassie of burning his film about the Capwells, then they both disappear...

 

The Dobson's wanted nothing to do with the current plots so they were dropped.  Concurrently, Gloria Monty was returning to GH and although there were multiple firings, every character got an exit.  Cassie was simply never discussed again by anyone in her family.  Much like her nephew Brick.   

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As an aside, I remember learning that Gordon Thomson was going to be Mason #3 by E!, of all things. The channel, before reality hell, used to have a newsy format, and host Ken Taylor did hourly soap segments, and it was during one of those where GT's photo was shown and it was announced TL had left rather abruptly. I was surprised, but I remember just being glad that Mason would be a brunette again. LOL! If I recall, it was E! that had that Pure Soap show with Shelley Taylor Morgan, too, later on.

 

ETA and a bit OT: I found a current pic of Shelley Taylor-Morgan from an article about some radio show she was hosting back in 2017. The face is still pretty much the same, but wow...bright hair!

 

Funny, though, that I always remember her more from Hunter as Sgt. Kitty O'Hearn than I do from the soaps. (Her first episode was on just last night, when Hunter went missing and she teamed up with McCall...and the villain was played by Joe Mascolo! A sort of Days reunion.)

Edited by Wendy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was watching episodes on Youtube.  It was co-hosted by Michael Logan and his insane mullet. Here's a crazy piece of trivia, it was E!'s first live show because it was produced before the concept of screeners, so they were actually watching the shows and reporting on them the same day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Of course, SB and Hunter had Robert Newman in common. Between stints as GL's Josh Lewis, he was the second actor to play Kirk "The Jerk" Cranston (I believe Joseph Bottoms got booked to make a movie and was let out of his contract early and Robert Newman came in to finish Kirk's arc). He also played the guy who married Dee Dee McCall and left town with her when Stepfanie Kramer decided to leave the show. He's reviled by Hunter fans to this day just for marrying McCall. 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I was just going to respond with this. LOL! When the revival series began in 2003, his character Alex Turnan, went poof! McCall was suddenly still Dee Dee McCall, engaged to some other dude. (Of course he turned out to be bad or die or something and Dee Dee was again a cop with Hunter, this time in San Diego instead of LA.) So Alex doing a fade was celebrated by many.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

RN seems like a really nice guy in real life, too. Hopefully he takes the Hunter reaction to his character in stride. 

 

When Kirk was brought back for a couple of short stints to harass Eden and Cruz, it was Joseph Bottoms who played him. I remember reading once that Robin Wright had a big crush on him IRL, but I don't know if that was true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was trying to count the number of stories that used the Capwell-Lockridge tunnel as a plot device. 

 

I think of: (1) Channing's Murder, (2) the 4 orphans used it,  (3&4) the forged art in the tunnel was used twice in stories (once when JAN left as Warren, and later when Gina tries to con CC).  It's remarkable that different writers all used the same device.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The tunnel withstood two earthquakes and fires in both homes.  I think the Capridge spring (which rejuvenated Minx from Dame Judith Anderson to Janis Wells) was at ground level above the tunnel, on the dividing line between the two estates.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Uh-oh. Today just might’ve been the first Paula/Jeanne stinker. I have a feeling whose fault that might be though. So, Doug III is getting a job at the Pub?  It’s good to see him interact with other characters. I enjoyed his scenes with Roman, even though the talk of Frankie and Max seemed a little random. And it also could be really interesting now that Tate knows. Days really need to start pushing their rivalry again. We need some follow up from the punch. Tying it all to Holly, to Sophia’s pregnancy, to the guys that Doug III owes money to could be good.  But yeah, wayyy too much Leo again in today’s episode. Seriously, has anything changed with this nothing character? I thought it was all Ron’s fault, but maybe Greg Rikaart is (partially) responsible for Leo being so insufferable.  And yeah seriously, Rafe needs to throw all of these people out of his house. Including Gabi

      Please register in order to view this content

      But I do wonder who’s the mysterious voice that Gabi overheard with EJ on the night he was shot. Based on yesterday’s episode, I have a suspicion. 
    • Add me to the group of people who think that Brandon has improved. He has. There's no doubt about it. Especially compared to the beginning. And he's improving in a way that... it makes me think that he realizes what the issues are and is addressing them. Of course, he's no master of acting at this point... but I don't cringe as much as I did. And I've seen people in Bold... I won't even have to name names, because everyone knows who they are... who are becoming even worse than what they were offering in the first place. So... I'm happy that in BTG... people are actually blossoming and improving. It surely means that the atmosphere is creative and nurturing talent.  BUT and it's a big butt... his relationship with his husband is still so lacking and ghastly. I am craving to see more action from these guys. I want to see Smitty's character. If he has any. 
    • Thank you. You guys come to the rescue again. I'll take a look later.   Thank you for the info!!! Now I find myself less confused. You and @DRW50 are amazing.
    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy