Jump to content

Santa Barbara Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

To whoever asked about Pearl, he was...quirky, as many B characters (or even A characters) on SB were. I may be wrong, as it has been ages, but I believe the character was revealed to also have come from some wealthy family, but he chose to walk away from it all and marched to the beat of his own drum. There are some clips on YT where he is peripherally involved with the Tori/Mason/Julia arc when Pearl babysits Chip (I have no idea why - at the time, Chip was thought to be Tori and Mason's) and Julia comes to see one or the other (unusual triangle in that the women were sort of friends) and heard poor wet Chip screaming as poor Pearl is pretty clueless and Julia must take over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This show seemed to have a fascination with nuns: Mary Duvall, Greta (the one with the article just posted - briefly recall her with Michael a bit), and Sister Sarah when Mason looks into Mark's death. Then there was SB's answer to the "Thorn Birds" with Father Michael the priest to round out the other side.

Too bad Michael was dull until (IMO) he hooked up with Flame (long gone from the priesthood and back to being a cop).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's interesting about all the nuns. Was Sarah the deaf nun? I posted an article on the deaf nun a while back. I got the feeling her story was supposed to go further than it did, based on a strike article later that year.

That's also interesting about Lane Davies. I think NLG may have said something about ad-libs...there was also an article about censorship or vulgarity. Robin Mattson wasn't thrilled with some close up shots of her ass in a teddy as she bent over.

Edited by CarlD2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, from something else I'd heard or read, Sarah was supposed to be yet another possible Mason and Julia foil/love interest. But then came the '88 Writers' strike, a deaf actress was cast, and it all changed from there.

Also in '91, Maria Ellingsen's Katrina was also supposed to catch Mason's eye per the Dobsons. Which, sorry, yuck. Mason looked like her father. And NBC canned the Dobsons again and that was that.

The Dobsons once said they always saw Mason as tragic. And while I get their show was taken away, he had changed in their absence, and doing the Mary thing again and again with the sweet women seemed pointless. (They had referred to Mason/Julia as star-crossed lovers, which implies sadness or whatever with that term, IMO.) But frankly, by the end, I thought M/J had fit and were one of the last prominent links to old SB that were left...which wasn't much. Sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It did seem like the show kind of ran out of ideas for Mason. Do you think they should have written him out when Lane left?

If there are any actors you'd like to see interviews of let me know, although it's mostly just Digest-related stuff I have at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, even if the writing was meh by then, I thought M/J competing for the judge position was a good idea in theory, and played to their competitive natures. But the writing was on fumes by then and it was about the time Pam Long started ramming the Walker drips down the audience's throat, etc.

And Mason/CC, at least, still seemed tenuous. That was, aside from Julia, Mason's "meat". His issues with his father.

Had the good writers still been there, I think a lot could have been done with Mason. His last GREAT stuff, IMO, was that disastrous Capwell Dinner in '91. Gordon Thomson was the closest to capturing Mason's real essence there since Lane Davies.

ETA: I do believe I have some old SOD/SOW (read: before SOD/SOW turned to [!@#$%^&*]) issues lying around someplace. Can't promise that, but I think so. If I do, if I ever find them, I could scan some things, too. And thanks for yours, Carl!

Edited by Wendy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I like that the Martin story hasn't been frequent.  The nightmares are periodic.  Each time, we viewers see more of the accident or whatever happened.  I think we might (or at least I might) be annoyed if we saw the nightmares too often.  At this point, I've become more curious, and so, when it's finally revealed, I think the timing will be just right.
    • Total agreement.  But wasn't AW wonderful with all those servants?  Louise, Brooks, Rocky, Karl (never seen), Beatrice, Helga, Sven, Vivian, etc.  None of the post-Lemay servants ever seemed to resonate, nor did any of them last very long.  I do think BTG would benefit from casting at least one servant for Anita and Vernon.  And perhaps another for Nicole and Ted.  The show needs more have-nots for the different perspective.   
    • Interesting, I didn't know the origins of their "friendship." Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Linda Dano or Felicia, but maybe the show would have been better off if they killed of Felicia instead of Quinn and built around her. Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't OLTL & ATWT pretty white at that time? Of all the stuff they threw at walls during that time to see what stuck, appealing to Black viewers seemed like a no-brainer. Especially since NBC had success at that time in Primetime with The Cosby Show & 227. Even in the mornings with Bryant Gumbel on Today. Of course, didn't have to be an either/or. I didn't mean to convey that Donna's isolation was the reason. Rachel, Felicia & Donna were all rich, 50ish brunettes who's characters started bleeding together by that point. Granted, mostly due to the bad writing of the writers she hired. Of the 3, getting rid of Donna would have been by far the easiest as VW had the most longevity/caused the biggest uproar; and Dano was the face of the show to the industry (and her favorite of the bunch). Thanks for the info of the alcoholism story. It was right before I started watching so I've only seen the clips of the intervention. Don't remember Cass & Donna at all. Was it last year of the show before he got with Lila? I was mostly checked out at that point.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Phillip/Harley made more sense as friends (as they were portrayed to be during the Pam Long era).. and I could even buy them being a short-term couple.. but end game they were not. Didn't GA say he thought it out of character that he would choose Harley over Beth.. or that he would leave Beth/Lizzie back in AZ in order for him to chase a vendetta?  I know that when Beth Chamberlain came back as Beth in late 1997, she was told instantly that the writing would be slanted toward Phillip/Harley.. which surprised her as well. When the Lorelei story came up, it actually made all of her out there/out of character behavior Beth displayed from 1997/1998 through the early/mid 00s make sense.  I liked that the final months of the show, Beth became more like Beth of old so at least the show ended on a positive for her character.
    • I think it was Most Irresistible Couple. I'm pretty sure ATWT's Jack and Carly were up for it to, and I felt gypped that they lost.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy