Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I like the list...except Ronald Reagan. Poor Ronnie! At least he and Nancy were glamorous and fun. America was splashy in their heyday and his administration was quite bipartisan. Plus, Nancy HATED Barbara Bush, so she gets my vote!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ronald Reagan was the worst president until Bush came along. He curbed inflation by borrowing from social programs and wanted to do anything he could to get rid of them (Head Start, Social Security, Medicare). He gave tax cuts to the rich and corporations in hopes it would stimulate the economy but stupid him did not realize they would used the saved money from the cuts to invest in building factories overseas and ship jobs there (this resulted in jacking up taxes for the middle and poor classes). He dreamed up the NAFTA agreement in hopes that it would send jobs down to Mexico and take them away from hardworking Americans whereas Clinton used NAFTA to build jobs here, not ship them to our neighbors down south to exploit cheap labor. He put us in danger through selling weapons to Iran and using the money he made off of that transaction to aid the Contras, a terrorist organization-very impeachable offense! His War On Drugs was way too simplistic and naive, he insulted Democrats every chance he got, he ran up a deficit that took Clinton eight years to pay off (imagine how long it will take to pay off the current one), he invaded Granada over nonsense, more people were without medical insurance under him (plus, he spoke out against socialized medicine with myths), he and his buddies sold weapons to Saddam Hussein and pretty much armed him, unemployment was at its highest number ever in 1984. Sure he might have had a sense of humor and he and Nancy were glamorous and fun but you need someone as president who knows what they are doing-he did not have a clue as to how to be president...I don't know where you get the idea that the administration was bipartisan. I cannot think of any Democrats who worked for him and he bashed Democrats every chance he got so no bipartisanship through Congress. He took credit for ending the Cold War when he had nothing to do with it-it merely happened when he was president. The Soviet Union or Empire was bound to collapse through internal struggles..it so happened while he was the president. All empires crumble: Roman, Ottoman, Soviet....it was not through him that it took place. He invested way too much money in a missile defense system known as "Star Wars" (a bad actor like him can only wish to be in a great movie like that saga) when that money could have gone to bigger causes (plus, why did we need missiles? Oh yea-because he sold weapons to Mr. Hussein who could use them against us! Don't sell weapons to others and therefore there would be no need for building missiles). His wife also bought expensive china that cost taxpayers plenty of money and his response was just a big ole great job to Nancy...he can still criticize his wife. I am not fond of Nancy either...sure, she hated Barbara Bush but she also was pretty much a useless First Lady (but I will take Nancy over Stepford Laura Bush). She does not rank up there with empowered First Ladys like Eleanor Roosevelt, Jackie Kennedy, Rosalynn Carter, and Hillary Clinton.

As my friend at the politics forum I post at said about Reagan: "He was a bad governor, a worse POTUS, and a really crappy actor! Sure, his funeral was nice but that was because he had nothing to do with it." That friend died in September/2006 and, if he had anything to do with it, he would kick Reagan out of Heaven...or did Reagan even go there? Not sure ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The media gives the impression that they all think alike and their leaders are Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. I don't get the sense from anything that I've heard said by the media that black people are capable of thinking for themselves.

Black people in America aren't just comprised of the ones who were born here from slavery. There are black people here that immigrated from other countries as well and have had children here. Their culture and traditions are different from Americans. I hear the media refer to Kwanzaa and I guess I'd have to take a trip to the community where it's celebrated to know any more than that because I don't know anyone that observes it.

A sportscaster on ABC's local affiliate interviewed Lennox Lewis (who is from England) prior to a fight that was scheduled here in Los Angeles. He asked Mr Lewis why he was staying at the Beverly Hills Four Seasons instead of somewhere in South Central. He made the false assumption that being black meant that Lennox Lewis would be familiar with South Central which apparently wasn't the case at the time so the sportscaster tried to clean it up by saying that The Four Seasons seemed like a soft place for a tough fighter.

I had a teacher once tell me that she and her husband went to London on vacation and she was surprised to hear the little black children speaking cockney. I guess they were supposed to speak American slang.

I know a lot of small minded people and I can safely say that small mindedness doesn't discriminate. It gladly resides in all kinds of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ronald Reagan ran for president on the premise that the federal government had extended its reach beyond that which the constitution expected. He said if he was elected he was going to change the federal government's role in programs. His specific target area was education, environmental programs, workers' programs such as OSHA. He also said if he was elected he was going to cut taxes and increase spending on certain programs, particularly military spending. At the time of the election, Jimmy Carter was president, we had double digit inflation, interest rates and in many parts of the country, double digit unemployment. There was also the Irainian Hostage situation. Reagan's argument was that if you cut taxes, it would put more money into the pockets of Americans and they would spend their way out of the economic downturn. He also argued that increasing government spending would make the military strong enough to withstand Iranian hostage crises. Also increased spending would stimulate the economy. It was a modification of Keynsian Economic Principles. The problems were the tax cuts were too massive, the spending too large and much of the tax cuts aimed only at the richest Americans. I thought it would lead the American peopel to understand that monetary policy not fiscal policy is the best way out of economic trouble.

I did not, do not and never will support his programs. But he said he was going to do that and the American people elected him to do it. He did what he said he was going to do. I think he was a poor president because he became so disengaged and relied too heavily on campaign and White House advisors. His economic policies did cause the deficit to balloon. But the American people elected him to do just what he did. Many many conservatives argue that the federal government is involved in too much of what the states should be doing. I don't think he will be remembered as one of the nation's worst presidents. I don't think he will be remembered as a good one either. He just seemed to be too out of touch. He really did rely way too much on advisors and really didn't seem to know what is going on. I don't think he will be judged because he was a rock rib conservative though.

Personally, I think Jimmy Carter was one of the nation's worst presidents. He has been a better former president. Nixon also was a crook and a bad man. Unfortunately, in spite of that he really was a very good president. Had he not been such a bad man, he probably would be remembered as one of our best presidents. Buchanan generally gets the nod as the worst. LOL.

I think Bush will be recalled as one of our worst presidents. He got us into a war, we were misled about why, he was unable to accomplish any of his major legislative programs. He was inattentive and he could not communicate with the public in such a way that he could inspire the country. He checked out on the country's major issues. What a flop he has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not just the media.

There are many who think that all Obama has to do is get all of us in one area, say a few words and we'll listen to whatever he says because we can't think for ourselves, which I have and always will find very insulting.

Kinda like when you hear someone say "You know, some of my best friends are black......."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      I got to agree. The show was a mess.  The stories that are not working were the ones featured in today's episode. That was a red flag indicating how bad the episode was going to be.
    • Thanks as always @alwaysAMC The remote was panned in the soap press at the time, especially Philip wandering around in the costume as well as some of the comedy.  I have to admit it didn't bother me, even though I knew how ludicrous the idea was of the Spauldings having a wedding at a theme park. I thought there were some fun moments and I did like the scene where Lucy got to cry and grieve over what Brent had done to her.  I think I was just glad to get away from the stories in Springfield, which were bad and getting worse.  There are a number of attempts at revamping the opening music in 1996. I'll be interested in what you think of them. I remember being glad they updated the photos but also noticing how cheap they looked. The show did need a new opening. Sadly, Rauch would instead just not even have an opening for over 5 years.
    • BTG: - Shelley Curtis first listed as Director on May 19   Another FOJulie director. 
    • It’s been awhile since I’ve seen a good soap cat fight so this was highly satisfying. Loved the Drew/Curtis scenes. Drew may not end up murdered but someone is going to try and kill him and it feels like it’s going to be much sooner than later. Who thought Dante ranting and raving for weeks on end would be good writing just to create angst between him and Gio. I really don’t think you needed to make Dante this fuc.king annoying.
    • I get what you're saying, in that this is what allows you to accept what you are watching, and that works for you. But for me, changing the traits of a character that much with a recast and new writing, then they are no longer the same character.  I am unable to accept that a villain is now just a nice dude because the show wants me to, I just cannot.  If they want a grey character, then they should write off the villain and *create* a new character who is grey.  I'll never accept that Sonny Corinthos is a nice guy, despite what GH wants me to think.  Same goes for the villains on DAYS. It's frustrating for me, and not enjoyable.  It occurs to me that I watch soaps to be entertained, and the current show is just making me angry and irritated. It's not fun for me.  I want to honor Drake to see John's story conclude, but there isn't much of interest to me anymore at all, so I'll probably stop following the show in a few weeks.
    • The wikipedia article doesn't explain much. I watched the Party of Five reboot, it was on Freeform in 2020.  It was five years ago, but I'll tell you what I remember: In the original Party of Five series , the parents died, and the five sibling orphans worked together to raise themselves with the older ones looking out for the younger, while managing the family restaurant.  The oldest child wants to have fun but ends up assuming the responsibility. In the 2020 reboot: The family were Mexican, the parents were undocumented, and the oldest child is an adult who could stay in the US for DACA.  In the reboot, instead of the parents dying -- in the first episode the parents were arrested by ICE and sent back to Mexico.   The five children were left in the U.S. to raise themselves with the older ones looking out for the younger, while managing the family restaurant.  The oldest child wants to have fun but ends up assuming the responsibility.  The teens go through teen stuff and the older ones explore careers.  The child daughter feels sad without her parents, and there is also a baby.  But the children were able to have periodic phonecalls with their parents in Mexico, which were very emotional.  The children hire an attorney to try to get their parents returned to the U.S.  The dad phones them to check on the management of the restaurant.  The younger children crave talking to the mom on the phone. The viewers also see how the parents are coping with the strain in Mexico:  the mom works as a nanny and the dad gets odd jobs-- they almost divorce, and the mom wants to stay in Mexico.  I think a few of the children got to take the bus to Mexico to visit their parents. The youngest child was a baby and the next-youngest missed the parents very much.  In the season one finale, it was decided that the youngest two would remain Mexico and live with their parents.  The older children remained in the USA and were following their dreams.  Season One finished airing just as the COVID epidemic began and everything shut down. The show was not renewed for Season Two.   That's all I remember.  It was good but very different from the original. Edit to add: Amazing how the world has changed in five years.  The reboot was filmed in 2019 during the first Tr*mp presidency, and aired in 2020.  The immigration situation was tense then, and that was explored in the series.  But it seems carefree in comparison to the real world today in 2025. Edit to add more thoughts.  I have no idea what would have happened in future seasons, since the five siblings were no longer a "party of five" at the end of Season One.   Supposedly the cancellation wasn't even announced until after the Season One finale aired.  But the season one finale was 90 minutes and wrapped up some lose ends, so maybe the producers anticipated a cancellation, and did that just in case? Perhaps if it there had been future seasons, the younger children would age and then return to the USA and the five would reunite? I don't know.
    • Probably not. Then again, if any character defined the final 25 years of GL it was Reva.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      The roles of Martin and Kat will now be played by Andre and Eva
    • Nope, we had taste, even in the 90s, and the richest family in town throwing a wedding at an amusement park was never cool. But, isn't funny that they're all back in Florida, but nobody mentions this is where Reva went nuts and drove off a bridge.  It seems like it might trigger some memories.
    • My rationalization (for whatever its worth) is that I'll give a pass to a character who has both been recast and is now written by a different staff (again, I'm under the assumptive that we all know right from wrong). One doubts the current writers want EJ to be a rapist, Julie to be prejudice, Philip to have one leg, or Xander to be a kidnapper.  But, that's what they inherited.  These are characters that resonate with the demo.  And, by soap justice standards, all evildoers receive justice, but doesn't always mean jail.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy