Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, there's a lot you CAN do. However, no one ever wants to discuss it. They want to belly ache, and then they want a quick fix. THe issue is that everyone thinks they can legislate what goes on in a classroom because everyone has been to school. But you don't see me telling a doctor how to do his job, because I've been in surgery before. Or telling the CEO of the bank how to run his business, because I have a checking account there. That would be absurd, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Casey, you are offended about something every single day. Nobody cares.

On the ads: As far as the sex ed crap, it was a deliberately misleading ad. The Palin in a swimsuit internet crap is deliberately misleading. One wrong does not justify another. I do think there is a difference between a presidential campaign willingly and knowingly paying for a misleading ad (and I think it is outright lying) and internet psychos. Although I will grant you in this environment that internet rumors tend to take on reality.

I also agree with those folks who talk about teachers and teachers being blamed. First I really do not think this country's education is a bad as people say. I also think that the overwhelming majority of teachers are pretty damn good and very dedicated. They don't get paid squat and I personally feel pretty good about my public education. All of you seem pretty bright. I think teachers do a pretty good job. All the comparative analysis of other countries are as misleading as McCain's ads B) . It's really easy to have great math scholars when you channel all the kids who are not naturally gifted into technical school. Teachers in America give full attention to all kids.

Bush did like being referred to as W and in fact his re-election sticker was a W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Roman, please note the words underlined and in bold above. You have the right to post the links you think pertinent, just as I have the right to scroll on by. You don't have to stop; in fact you should probably continue; as inevitably, someone follows your links and we enter some great discussion. I wish I could find some sources I could trust, but I've not bothered either. We all contribute to the thread in ways we choose and should continue to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It looks like the polls are all over the place. I think some of them must be using registered voters and others likely voters. I think the Rs are trying to say that Florida is already in McCain's pocket to dis-engage the Ds in that state. The only survey saying its a R state is Rove's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, he's doing his job. Trying to surpress Democratric turnout by saying it is in McCain's column. But every other poll show it to be even.

We'll find out November 4th. I saw Howard Fineman say that Florida will come down to Election Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What are you basing this argument on? What evidence do you have that this is the case?

Are the Democrats trying to "dis-engage" Republicans in the states that they have the lead? CA, NY, PA...etc...Of course not...

Definitely not true...

Here are all of the polls for FL in September.

RCP Average 09/05 - 09/17 -- 48.9 44.4 McCain +4.5

SurveyUSA 09/16 - 09/17 707 LV 51 45 McCain +6

CNN/Time 09/14 - 09/16 907 RV 48 48 Tie

FOX News/Rasmussen 09/14 - 09/14 500 LV 49 44 McCain +5

National Journal/FD 09/11 - 09/15 400 RV 44 44 Tie

InAdv/PollPosition 09/10 - 09/10 511 LV 50 42 McCain +8

Quinnipiac 09/05 - 09/09 1032 LV 50 43 McCain +7

PPP (D) 09/06 - 09/07 986 LV 50 45 McCain +5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I no longer read what is posted by certain posters but when someone quotes a poster in his/her response, I do get to see that. As a result I saw two things last night that fall under the things that make you go hmmmmm category.

The gist of one was that Barack Obama's mother wanted him to be associated with Islam since she gave him the middle name Hussein (this in reference to the whole Barry H. thing and the impression that the H. was being used to drum up the whole Hussein is a Muslim terrorist fear). So hmmmmmm his mother knew over four decades ago that Islam was going to be seeing as akin to terrorism by some people in USA......I don't think so. She may have wanted him to have an Islamic name but what does that have to do with anything since she named him decades ago? Nothing....exactly (I'm being my own amen chorus).

The other was that Barry H. wasn't the worst thing he could be called because look at all the horrible things Palin has been called. This little tit for tat logic is why the quality of debates go down. What makes it even faultier is Barack Obama is not the one saying all of those horrible things about Palin so it's the wrong tit for tat.

In my own ridiculous sense of logic I would think that saying Barry H. isn't the worst thing he can be called because obviously he's been called a lot worse would make a whole lot more sense. Uh maybe I should have paid more attention in school.

But back to victimized Palin who is quite clearly the only one suffering discrimination in this campaign (cough cough waffles)...please let me know when her defenders have gotten those little sexist action figures of her banned so that I can start to take their charges of sexism seriously.....see it was sexist of Tina Fey to spoof her but it wasn't sexist of that Fox News contributor to refer to her tits and other body part. America, America.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for your subtlety..How very indirect and priggish of you...This is in reference to a post that I made, if anyone is wondering who Wales has blocked out...

How many more times are you going to reference that you no longer read my posts? Does this make you somehow above petty debate? It would show more esteem on your part if you addressed my posts directly instead of the back-handed manner that you have adopted.

I said that his mother associated him to Islam far before Republicans did. Now it seems to be the fault of Republicans that his middle name is of Muslim origin. Although his name can easily be used in a negative connotation, no one can deny the fact, that it is his name..

I also made note of the fact that he is the only Presidential candidate in history that has a name that is politically-incorrect to use..

Obama supporters embrace every aspect of the man, except his name...Republicans are chastised for repeating his birth name. It's just silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think there's a story to tell in someone who always believed in honesty and integrity being emmeshed in so many lies, but I agree that it wasn't very well laid out over the last few months. I think if I was more invested in Lois, I would have more of an issue than I do. Few can hold up against Jane. This is one of those cases where I think mentioning who already switched babies or have long-lost children would just take away from the fallout. If Lulu wants to drag Brook Lyn for hypocrisy there is probably still time (if the show bothers). I don't think anyone would claim these are the best GH episodes ever. It may be very lowered expectations at play. But I do think that scenes like yesterdays were some of Tracy's best, as she is a character who is often not allowed that type of moment.
    • You would think that, wouldn't you? I'd almost think they needed the money to get Robert Newman back, but they also had to know Larkin wasn't going to stick around and play second banana either. I don't get what the writers thought they were doing with Calla. Long liked using actors from Texas, but other than Alex/Bev McKinsey, the characters she wrote for them seemed blah.
    • Bo has a bad history with kids named Zach. (too soon?)
    • Christie said in her interview this week that she recently started taking acting classes again, and has been doing some work in England, so that helped her to jump into Carrie for this (as well as it being all so familiar, it really was home.)
    • Andrea Barber aka Kimmy Gibbler did have a few scenes with Drake too, when he first came on. Christie came in the middle of that storyline 
    • Carrie, as played by Andrea Barber, was at Bo & Hope's wedding. She was the flower girl. The ringbearer was Zachary Parker, the little boy that Megan tried to pass off as her and Bo's son. Andrea's Carrie was at Tony & Anna's real wedding (Aug. 5, 1985). She appeared for the last time on March 21, 1986. Christie's Carrie debuted on April 14, 1986. It appears that Carrie remained in Salem, just off-screen, during that near-month. Christie picked up with what Andrea had been playing, apprehension over John.
    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
    • Another great episode.  GH has been pretty good this year, loading up the chamber, because now there's many bullets to fire, and another one was fired today when Nina found out Michael is the father of Sasha's baby.  I hope this secret comes out at the hearing.  I've also liked the slow burn with Gio/Emma. There's just so many things to look forward to on this show now.  GH is finally back to being really good. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy