Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I personally feel Obama can be "smeared" more, but I doubt McCain will allow too much of that too happen, unlike the Dems.

I would venture to guess that the possible first woman nominee or first black nominee would not point out age as a factor....that would be hypicritical to them and I am sure backfire, even if people think it.

Even though McCain I am sure wishes he never said 100 years at war, we all know this war on terror will probably go on longer than any of us will be around, so esstentially he is right, but probably a poor choice of words.

They were pushing for Romney because McCain can cut in to their base and Romney could not. Hillary on the other hand could reinforce the Repub base...plain and simple, but I think Obama could too....no experience, no plans, no accomplishments....easier than fighting Hils as far as I can see!

As for Roman....I did not generlize, I would never say ALL dems are liberal morons who do not care about the country or its security.

I would say CERTAIN ones do not....and I would assume that people like Nancy and Betty don't run because they did not want too, the others are dead...would make it too hard for them.

TO say all repubs hate science, love war etc is really a cheapshot. PLain and simple.

If we as a country vote on a more likeable person and a better talker....boy are we doomed as a country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

After all hillarys wins last night she is still trailing obama 1,520 delegates to hillarys 1,424. I'm gonna assume that all the delegates numbers aren't in yet, but she is still far from beating obama those numbers look similar to the numbers prior to last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But what you have to remember here is this is alot different than the Republican process.

Most of those were winner take all contests, just like the election will be in the fall. The Dems screwed up with this system and are now fighting each other just like they will with the Michigan and Florida contests.

how stupid to put a state like Michigan, which has the highest unemployment and worst budget problems through this. We as taxpayers paid $10 million dollars for an election that the Dems blew off, now we will be asked to pay for another "make up" election to make it fair.

Whatever, give Hill the votes.

Clinton has a HUGE fighting chance especially since the delegates get divided and the super delegets come into play.

To ask her to quit, while encouraging Huckabee who had a snowballs chance in hell of winning, is very off the mark and unfair.

Erica Kane...I appreciate your posts, very insightful and they make sense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now we will see if Barack can take a punch and come back fighting.

What I feel he must do is show that he is a tough canidate. Not neccesarily get nasty, but show the Clinton camp and everyone around the country that he can fight back at negative attacks, but their are many millions of people who want to see if he will just cower and fade away, or show what kind of person he is.

I also feel that he does have to start giving some specifics about his plans for the economy and foreign policy,because I feel many are starting to get bored by the great speeches that have no substance to them.

But what he really has to do is use Hillary and Bill's 8 years in the WH against them. Great economic times and no wars (which you can't say about the current admin.) but he needs to get to the down and dirty stuff BTS while putting on the good face for the people.

It'stime for him to start being a politician.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

now that is a great post Roman....and thats what I have been saying all along about him.

Thats all he is is words now...he has nothing else to offer...

He needs to show that he has ideas and he can think like a president.

Watch him when he gets any policy question....he stumbles, says "um" alot.

He needs to be more like Clinton and just fire back...even if your answer sucks, it seems like you have ideas and have it laid out...he has failed to do that.

I am not surprised to see him fading slightly becuase of this.

Both he and Clinton are drawing higher negative numbers not only because of their cat fight, but because he is failing to be anything more than a mouthpiece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I'm out of touch. That's why Bush extended his tenure for a second term on the strength of gay marriage fear mongering. Because of me. :lol: Conservatives were bloodthirsty for a war that had nothing to do with avenging the murders committed on 9/11. But no, they can't be trigger happy psychos. HELLO, we're talking about a group that irrationally props its special brand of domination, either by corporations or military force.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mulder, it is not bad to agree with people.

I honestly think McCain would have an easier time beating Obama than Hilary.

But it will be another close one either way I think.

McCain is not a bad guy, look how many conservatives HATE the thought of him being in there that they would actualyl vote for Hillary,...come on, that is not being another W.

Like it or not, the military and wars and so on will be an issue for many many years to come.

We will be fighting the war on terror for the remainder of our lives..or else 9-11 will keep happening until there is nothing left.

I think the McCain CLinton battle would be much more entertaining than the McCain Obama battle...experience vs. experience is alot better than experience vs. wind bag!

And stenbexck..in your view..every republican or person who voted for W is that person you characterize.

So all Dems or those who vote for dems are big government, tax tax tax politicians who would rather have us get attacked in our own country and protect the rights of terrorists, tree hugging SOB's?

I do not think that, but I guess if we go by your way of thinking.......it must be true?

I voted for W and I make no apologies for it. But I never wanted an amendment for gay marriage, I think stem cell reserach is a positive thing, etc......

You do not have to be fully against or fully for someone to know right from wrong and wrong from right.

Out of touch? I do believe you are with comments like that.

Sorry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I never provided my definition of the democratic agenda. None of those things would be in it though. :lol:

So if you know right from wrong, how are you confident in your decision to vote for Bush? HE doesn't even know right from wrong! One thing I'm not out of touch with is my own rationale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obama is screaming the math isn't there for Hillary, well it ain't there for you either. No one is going to get the number of delegates required to secure the nomination. Either the super delegates are going to decide this thing or some sort of deal has to be worked out. A Clinton/Obama ticket.... which is what it should have been in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy