Jump to content

2008: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It sounded to me like she just misinterpreted the question as "there were rumors of a blowup between you and Guza and Pratt...." (ie rumors that all three were at each other's throats, rather than Pruza vs. her). So she said she couldn't speak for Bob and Chuck's relationship but there was no blowup between her and either of them.

I thought it was odd though that Brian Frons called up a staff writer to tell her about a transfer.

I can't wait to hear what R Sinclair has to say about her reaction to the Josh storyline. Her "the ratings went up" rationale is sort of...off. They may have gone up for the reveal but there was also a huge explosion that may have had something to do with that. The ratings plummeted during the ensuing months.

Definitely sounded like she is done with soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Yeah, you could be right. I'll go back and listen to it closely to make sure.

Yeah, "transfers" don't happen to often. I wonder why Guza let her go though. I think if Guza wanted Michelle to stay, Michelle would've stayed - Frons would choose Guza over Megan anytime! I would love know the whole story though.

I was so disappointed how she backed McTavish's unabortion. Oh Michelle, why??? :(

That's okay, you still rock. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

At 72:18

Ryan: It’s funny how rumours start online because for the past 3 years, Jen and myself and others have heard from the soap “insiders” that there was this huge blow up with you and Bob and Chuck and that’s why you quit General Hospital and went back to All My Childen.

Michelle: No........If there was a blow up, I wasn’t involved in it. And I didn’t quit General Hospital, I was sent back to [All My Children]. I know that Megan wanted me. Megan made no bones about the fact that she really really wanted me......she really really wanted me.....and she had tried for a while to accomplish this. There was no blow up between me – I can’t speak up for Bob and Chuck......they were friends from film school. Whatever might have happened between the two of them, it had nothing to do with me.....or let me say, if it did, I’m completely unaware of it.

Ryan: Well there you have it folks. There you have it straight from the woman herself, so you can stop all the conspiracy theories. Cause that’s all I heard going into this interivew, “Oh my God, Ryan, you need to ask her about the incident between her and Bob and Chuck. We need to know.” There was no incident, people.

Michelle: As I say, there may have been an incident, but I don’t know what it was and I was not involved in it. I mean, Chuck and Bob, I think, parted ways but again, it had nothing whatsoever to do with me, nothing. So much so, that I don’t even know.....Well, I know that Chuck left to do a night time show, then, just like you, the rumour was they’ll never work together again. There’s always people in soaps that’ll never work together again and then they end up working together again. There may have been some edgyness between Chuck and Bob, as I say, they a relationship that goes back decades.........but I was not involved in it or at least if I was, I have no idea in what way.

--------------------------------------------------------------

"I think, parted ways" - What does that MEAN!!??? The way I'm interpreting it is that they had a falling out. How are you guys interpreting it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just listened to the Patrick interview, and though I still respect her, some of what she's said had me rolling my eyes.

Michelle Patrick really seems to adore McTavish and Guza's "vision" from what I've listened to. What she said about liking how Guza writes for dark male characters who aren't the ones bringing women flowers all the time had me in a deep gasp.

I'm sorry I didn't get back in time to send my questions, Ryan. I would've loved to hear Michelle talk more about working with Lorraine Broderick, since 3 of those 4 Emmy's she has comes from Broderick's HW tenure at AMC. When she talked about admiring certain things from certain writers, Broderick was noticeably missing, maybe she just forgot.

It seems to be a common theme for people who've worked with McTavish to defend her crappy storytelling, maybe it's an act, but let's just say I expected something different regarding the unabortion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Same here.

I thought about your reaction exactly when she said that. It was all so unbelievable... So many of these great writers are divorced from reality.

How can you forget Lorraine Broderick? How? And remember and praise McTavish?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Because Broderick would never allow writing storylines for thugs who are painted as the central heroes on soaps, or stories about faux sci-fi plots that totally damage the groundbreaking history of a particular soap. :rolleyes:

A recent quote from Broderick, given during an interview regarding the soap opera screenwriting class she taught at Drexel University earlier this year:

Yes, you can tell so many of Patrick's answers left me a bit bitter.

When she talked about how GH did all this ridiculous stuff in the 80's, and used it as an excuse for Megan's shitty storylines, I was about to loose it. AMC and GH are two totally different shows. Agnes Nixon is known for injecting reality into her storytelling, and even though she supposedly supported the un-abortion, Agnes would never allow such a medical abomination on any of her shows if she had total control. AMC was known for being a trend-setter in terms of social issues, not a poorly written and executed rape infested (Megan's trademark!) sci-fi rip-off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe because she didn't work directly with Agnes, and Agnes' influence seemed to wain significantly from when Patrick first joined AMC to now. She mentioned Agnes sharing the HW duties with Lorraine Broderick (the ONLY mention of Broderick in the interview) and Wisner Washman when she first joined. I think Agnes worked more so with the HW's and EP's, not the script or breakdown writers.

It seemed to me that she's more of a fan of fantasy related storytelling than realistic storytelling, which there's nothing wrong with per se, but I found some of her justifications for poorly received storylines very flawed, but that's me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This whole interview has left me deeply, deeply depressed, actually. I turned in 90 minutes from loving this woman so much to being so disappointed. Apart from praising Joanna Cohen, she hasn't said one single right thing. She pushed all the wrong buttons.

This is why it is so scary to say you wish a SW you love would become the show's next HW. There are so many variables here in play we don't know about. It's a worn-out story that the fact the script, the dialogue is great doesn't mean their stories will be too.

How can someone praise Megan and her ways? And love Guza's dark and brooding men?

I have turned into something I don't like: I have difficulties with 90% or more of today's writers. I just don't know what are these people doing here! They are so divorced from what a soap opera should be - I mean split screens à la 24?! :blink:

That said, I really, really think Pratt should get her to write for AMC as soon as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See, i love Guza's dark men. And i love it when soaps do things like split screens.

however the issue is the same issues soaps have faced for decades. balance. those dark guys need soemthing light. those split screen should only be used few and far between. campy over the top action storylines should be played during one very true to life, and not campy at all. etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are right. But my point with the split screens aren't per se going to make soaps popular. All these people seem to forget one immensely important thing: first comes the story and then the way you tell it. Besides, 24 has really gotten only worse during all the years it's been on: you can clearly see the pattern the show tells stories and it wasn't interesting because you knew what was going to happen. Hopefully, Howard Gordon (or whoever runs that show now) will fix and stir things up a bit.

As for those dark and brooding men - they have clogged the screens and it's time to get some rest from them. Had they been balanced from the start, I wouldn't mind them. But after all these years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Another example of the dysfunctional enmeshment that the Duprees labor under.   Dani freaking out about her father coming to visit as she's in bed with her boy toy totally screamed teenager instead of a grown ass woman that has two adult children.  The whole family needs to be in therapy including Nicole (who probably became a therapist because of the dysfunction within the family). @ranger1rgConsidering the fact that Chelsea has been controlled by a domineering Dani... I would be more surprised if Chelsea wasn't being extra and/or pushy.  She's spent more time being a model, having every move controlled by Dani, and being on social media as opposed to developing interpersonal relationships with her peers.
    • I agree. Every time she's on, it reads as "We're writing her in to fulfill her guarantee."
    • -- Hayley acted jealous when she walked in on Bill and Ashley. Really? I'm sorry, but they're writing Hayley as ridiculous. -- I'm not crazy about the way they're writing Bill's stroke and recovery/rehab. Doesn't feel like he went through much at all. -- So Shanice gets a promotion to physical therapist. Kind of laughable, but I'll take it to get more Shanice -- as long as her original personality remains intact. This is clearly a change from the original bible because the actress has been so good and popular. -- Chelsea is flat-out embarrassing in her thirst for Madison. In addition, I see no way Dr. Montgomery would be good with going live on Chelsea's IG. -- Why is Dani acting like she never ate at Orphey Gene's before? Are they serious with this? -- Good scenes with Anita, Tracy, and Sharon, and I appreciated Tracy's dialogue referring to "us 4 little colored girls." Nice nod to history. Then they wrecked it with another reference to "Articulettes Strong," which makes me cringe. -- Ever notice the staircase in the Dupree mansion's foyer? I can't get over how narrow those steps look.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Larkin was a very dashing and charismatic figure, but they started way too hot, made the character too unpleasant, and then pulled too far back with the tedious triangle. They also needed to get Reva away from the Lewises at that point rather than tying Kyle to them. They did this somewhat with the suicide attempt and working with Fletcher but not enough. I wonder what Pam Long's plans would have been for Cain. Jerry Lanning was always a mix of sinister and very cold to me, but she must have had some idea for him as she had also used him on Texas.
    • Chelsea is a stalker like her mother. She is annoying me big time.
    • As you point out,  Courtney seems to be the only logical person if the rumor was told to Zimmer and it's not just something she wrote to spice up the book. It could also be that Zimmer knew about the JC/JS relationship and just assumed that was the reason for her firing. It just reeks of Paul Rauch badmouthing Courtney though. I don't know why he and Lemay had it out for her. @DeeVee
    • Rebecca Budig sticks out like a sore thumb as Taylor. She has not added anything to the show or role of Taylor. A horrible recast.  
    • I hope Dumb Dora loses custody of her kids. Kristina needs to go away. I can't believe she is still roaming around town.
    • I can see Kim thinking to herself---why would I be so emotionally invested in a guy who literally looks like he is the slasher in a slasher film?  I think they tried expanding Reva's reach and having her anchor this story, and it doesn't work. I don't think anyone could've really, as Cain is never a compelling figure. It is a hoot seeing a younger Victor Garber though. I'd speculate that Reva and Kyle were popular because the viewers didn't expect Josh back, and they wanted to see Reva happy. Otherwise, I don't get it. He's more controlling than generous. I watched a little of the actress that Long supposedly wanted for the role. She doesn't seem very good. In Texas, she seems to be very similar to Vanessa, and I can't imagine her projecting a more down to earth image.
    • I think this is where the show having an older audience comes in handy as that is who is buying these releases. And buying the books, presumably.  I have family who in the last few years have watched the show pretty much every day. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy