Jump to content

DAYS: Why Drake and John?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I honestly can't see Hogan writing for Marlena, even if John is gone or not. I've seen nothing from him at all that indicates he has an interest in writing for her character at all.

Plus why does John have to be "gone" for him to write for her? That's crap and lazy writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm a longtime fan of this show, and the beauty of this death is that it can resonate for a very long time. It's not some small deal that we will forget in ten minutes. We aren't sitting here talking about Lauren's death a few eps ago. This is the first death to produce real drama in....well since Maggie in the killer storyline. This time though, I think there's not much doubt at all that he's dead. I think it may come back to haunt the show in the next few months. I think (despite the money issues) getting Wayne N. back as Roman could ease some pain.

Now, Dee is the heorine again. She's strong, independant, not relying on John to rescue her. More like the Marlena of old. Besides that though, I see no longterm benfits for the show. It's just good right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i couldnt disagree more.

Hogan has from the start talked how about his Marlena love and how she needs to add heart back into the show. I do agree that he wanted to kill John from the start but couldnt.

and this is soo far from lazy writing, IMO. Days in the past 2 weeks has been the most complex and thought out daytime drama on the air in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Hogan is going to stick to his word and write for Marlena either! This is the first piece of juicy material that she's been given in god knows how long, and probably the only good material she's going to have. After this, Marlena will be tossed aside while Hogan writes for the younger (and lame) characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i stand by this... this was a brilliant and great choice. killing john black, as long as he stays dead, is amazing, it was sudden. death is sudeen and does come out of nowehere. as for the no buildup, i like it that way because it is even more sudden. I dont think this was random or came from out of nowehere. I do belive this was hogans first story he wanted to tell but couldnt for whatever reasons. it is a great umbrella storyline that involved everyone on the show and can provide major long term storylines.

as for marlena, i think this does free up the char. i loved john and mar, but he always seemed to tie her down and make her a bore. i have wanted him gone for years now to free her up so im glad its finnaly happening.

but whatever, haters are gonna hate. because god forbid you actually like something on a soap opera in this day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I don't think it's a case of haters hating. Sure, I hate what they did to John, but I'm looking at it from the angle of what it will do to the ratings. We're all sticking around to watch the show even after the funeral and into the future. But I'm looking at where this show is one month from now, three months, six months... if the ratings take a turn down to about 1.3 or 1.4 -- where Passions was when it got canceled by NBC -- then you can argue killing John was indeed the straw that broke the camel's back.

I don't think we have to worry about ratings that low myself, but it depends on how many of the J/M crowd choose to abandon ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the show could regret it in the not too distant future. Basically, HS tried to retire both Bo/Hope and John/Marlena at the same time - accounting probably for a lot of declining ratings (he lost Jack and Jen as well). With an aging soap watching population, this probably is an attempt to marginalize Marlena to matriarch status (replacing Alice in some way). OLTL tried to do that to Viki, and has finally been forced to hire a new love interest (very reluctantly, I suspect). No one wants to be told they're near retirement age, especially now as people are aging better and living longer. If (more likely when) they try another romantic pairing, there will be criticism because it won't live up to John Black/Marlena. Hogan will lose credibility if he 'resurrects' John.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Reading a post like this just reminds me of how badly Matt and Missy got screwed. Posters casually include SN&MBE in the big six. But Matt and Missy were never treated like mega-stars. Except they were once the biggest stars on daytime. They were NOT comic relief. When they returned they deserved good character portrayal, good airtime and good story.

But the show just blew it. They had a couple of mega-characters and they just walked away from them. There was no reason for it. And, sadly, most posters here probably don't even know what I'm talking about.

Oh well....what might have been.

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That makes so much sense!! Hogie wanted to write out John from last year. I think two things stopped him. 1) Corday at the last minute probably didn't have the balls to go through with it and was afraid of the ratings drop and fan backlash for destroying one of daytime's most popular couples 2) Hogie realized that this would probably make E.J. irredeemable since he was the one that would have been responsible.

Before John got shot, he and Marlena were very involved on the canvas. You saw them working together, trying to solve mysteries, banter back and forth, make love, in danger together, etc. People started to say how much they were enjoying Jarlena and that was the perfect setup to make sure John's death would have had more emotional impact. That was the time they planned to kill John until Corday saved him. Remember how Hogie kept saying that he wanted to make Marlena more realistic, independent, and as fiesty as she was years ago? They were also trying to win her an emmy. John's death is the way that he planned on accomplishing all of that! Drake knew John's time was up from back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it was a matter of not being able to write for Marlena outside of John. Its more of not being able to write for John outside of Marlena. When you think about it, what more can you write for that character? Everything has basically been done! He would have to be bumped down to a supporting character anyway. John has always been a lead character but it was only because he was paired with a lead actress, not because Drake had any sort of phenomenal acting skills. It is NOT a coincidence that Drake has never been nominated for ANY emmy award for ANYTHING he has done in the last 21 years. As much as I love John and Drake, he isn't the type of actor that can stand on his own. He needs to be paired with other people and then its hit or miss. Sometimes he's good, sometimes he's not. If they had to sacrifice John so that Marlena can be front and center again, then I have NO problem with that (and I am a big Jarlena fan, especially when JER wrote for them). Only Deidre can save the show right now(as she has numerous times in the past) and since she is the highest paid actress at DAYS, they had to cut out the highest paid actor so that Dee can get some more airtime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
    • Hotel was The Love Boat on land but a little soapier. I will forever maintain that Hotel was a time slot hit. I don't believe that 1983/84 Hotel was a better show than Knots Landing.
    • The Golden Girls key episodes by ratings September 14, 1985: The Engagement (series premiere), rating 25.0, #1 Season highs February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 February 6, 1988: My Brother, My Father; rating 24.6 November 26, 1988: Sophia's Wedding (Part 2), rating 24.3, #1 September 23, 1989: Sick and Tired (Part 1) (season 5 premiere), rating 23.5 January 12, 1991: Sisters of the Bride, rating 19.3 May 9, 1992: One Flew Out of the Cuckoo's Nest (series finale), rating 18.9 Season lows October 19, 1985: The Triangle, rating 18.6 May 16, 1987: Empty Nests (season 2 finale), rating 17.8 February 20, 1988: And Ma Makes Three, rating 18.0 April 29, 1989: Rites of Spring, rating 18.7 April 28, 1990: All Bets are Off, rating 15.8 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 Ten highest-rated episodes October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 January 3, 1987: The Sisters, rating 27.0 November 22, 1986: Family Affair, rating 26.8 January 10, 1987: The Stan Who Came to Dinner, rating 26.6 January 24, 1987: Before and After, rating 26.4 February 28, 1987: Whose Face is This, Anyway?; rating 25.8 September 27, 1986: End of the Curse (season 2 premiere), rating 25.6 November 15, 1986: Big Daddy's Little Lady, rating 25.3 February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 Ten lowest-rated episodes October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 September 28, 1991: The Case of the Libertine Belle, rating 10.9 October 19, 1991: Where's Charlie?, rating 11.0 February 15, 1992: Ebbtide VI: The Wrath of Stan, rating 11.3 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 December 14, 1991: The Pope's Ring, rating 11.7 April 25, 1992: Home Again, Rose (Part 1); rating 12.3 October 5, 1991: Beauty and the Beast, rating 12.7 November 2, 1991: Dateline: Miami, rating 12.7 December 7, 1991: From Here to the Pharmacy, rating 12.8
    • The timing is strange, though. How far in advance would they normally be on location? The Achille Lauro hijacking was on October 7, 1985. Nancy had arrived in Egypt in the storyline by October 18. But the character of Hawk, Chris' Native American friend from Arizona, had already appeared onscreen by September and brought a letter telling Chris to be in Egypt by October 25th.  Why did they already have the link to Arizona before the reason to cancel the shoot in Egypt?  The dust and the jar it came in were from Egypt though. Nancy bought it there and sent it to Mac as a gift before she came back to the states and followed Chris to Arizona.
    • Actually that is not what happened. Nor is the timing right for it to have been. We learned from a WOST interview with Pete Lemay  in 2006, which can be found on YT, that it was Fred Silverman's idea to do the 90 minute show. I don't know how much you know about him but he had these amazing successes as head of daytime at both ABC & at CBS. Then he came to NBC where basically everything he touched turned NOT TO GOLD but to shite. Some of the most expensive shows ever produced up to that time were huge flops. Although even he, like a broken clock, could be right on occasion. However, as we know, he was not right about the 90 minute show. As a matter of fact, afterward,  NBC programmers, who worked FOR him, were asked why they did it & they were quoted as saying it was because they couldn't think of anything else to try. It was a stupid idea from a man who had reached the point where he was throwing anything at the wall to see if it would stick.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy