Jump to content

September 17-21, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

i'm glad to see that i'm not alone concerning my complaints of Days. i commented earlier in the week about one of their shows and i was basically told by the others how great days as been for about a week - lol - and that it's just amazing and hot right now. i was like...i'm not even going to respond. the show has so many problems it's a shell of a soap right now. i realize that i'm 38...i remember being a little kid during the golden age of another world, santa barbara, texas etc. Those were soaps....i realize the younger crowds here who only remember the mid-90's must think i'm nuts...but...compared to actors like victoria wyndham, anne heche, beverlee mcKinsey, marcy walker, a martinez, lane davies, and writers like harding lemay and bridget and jerome dobson - todays soaps all away around just don't cut it. and it's NOT just all the young actors of today. does anyone remember marcy walker winning an outstanding lead actress emmy for santa barbara in her early 20's? or anne heche playing the twins on another world at the age of 17-18? or robin wright playing kelly on santa barbara?

i dunno....i haven't left the soaps...i just feel like the soaps left my age group...we have memories...real vivid memories of great shows, actors, writing etc. and today's shows just don't cut it. and i'm just so sick of all of their silly excuses....enough is enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I wouldn't be so angry if I felt that TPTB at DAYS were making any realistic effort to try and save the show. Let's be honest, what they want is to afford a cheaper show geared at a younger audience, it's just a matter of "training" us to not care about the vets any more. It doesn't work, accept it! These people do not care to see it even go out in style. Either that or they are outrageously stupid, more so than I am comfortable believing. The stories are so lazily executed, I have to believe that it's more a matter of them thinking they can get away with it because the audience doesn't expect much anyway*. And that just makes me angry at the way the entire last fifteen years have gone, with an erosion of characterization and depth and emotional intelligence in the storylines.

Sigh, another thoroughly depressing Thursday. I need to go chuck something.

* And that's why I'm so critical about quality, if nobody demands better we'll never be given any better. But then I suppose I'm naive thinking anyone listens anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the soaps have improved since the early part of the decade when it comes to listening to what the fans want.... In desperation daytime has finally become a little less conservative. And yet, this past year has been one of the worst years ratings-wise in history.

Why? Is it possible that the networks were right and we were all wrong? Not trying to state anything here, just planting a seed for discussion... I personally don't like Hogan's writing, but DAYS was worse under Tom Langan and didn't see anything near this kind of erosion. Why now and not earlier? What has changed?

And AMC may still be in the ratings basement, but B&E are doing a good job IMO of slowly rebuilding the show. McTavish had years to screw up the show and you can't go back in a day, as DAYS has demonstrated numerous times. Quick fixes don't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could kiss you for saying this. I completely agree. We all want to point fingers at the shows individually. How this character is being played too much, or these other characters are on the backburner. But you're so right... Days has been in MUCH worse shape before, and the audience watched. Maybe there just is no audience anymore. And the audience it has relies on DVR's and SoapNet. All shows keep experiencing .1 bumps up and down, but five years from now, will all shows be in the 1.5 area, with Y&R at #1 with a 2.9?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was hoping ATWT would go up .1. But I am glad they held steady. Monday and Tuesday's show were ok. Wednesday, Thursday and Friday were the better shows of that week. And Luke and Noah were on Wednesday and Thursday's show. :D The higher rated ones. I am also glad ATWT didnt get those 2.0 or lower. Next week I am going out on a limb and saying they will go up to at least a 2.3.

Ouch for Days...two 1.7's??? :o

And it looks like ATWT will remain at #5 in Total Viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seems like Days is doing ok considering they are now competing with not two but THREE soaps in some markets including Passions on DirecTV. Not every Days fans who had to make a choice was going to stick with it. Some will watch OLTL, ATWT or Passions. Maybe some home viewers don't want to record a soap so they had to make a choice in that timeslot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also noticed that this week's numbers are exactly the same as last week's numbers. Could the ATWT audience be paying attention when Luke and Noah appear? So they can watch. I am referring more to this week than last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm beginning to fear that too many fans have left and are just never coming back. I'm afraid that too many people just don't trust "Days" anymore.

The actors are there, and the characters are there. Ed Scott is there. But the show is "stuck," and we're running out of time. All the sand has almost run out of the hourglass.

Is it too late to "save DAYS" this time??? :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it was too late the minute that idiot whatever his name is said that DAYS was gone in 2009, that is when the ratings starting tanking bigtime, sure alot of it is that Hogan is not that good, but that comment was pretty much when it started taking the bigger hits ratings wise. Who is going to watch a show no matter how good, if they know it is going off the air in a few years. And yes I know alot of fans are still diehard DAYS fans which is fine, but alot of people might have heard that comment and not looked back. Even if Ed Scott is on the team now, that is not going to matter to those people that heard the NBC person say the show is gone in a few years, why should they bother coming back for a few short years of shows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

...and DAYS wasn't the only soap on NBC then.

It's also good to see OLTL up again. That show has yet to disappoint me. My wish is to see it beat GH in households and/or total viewers.

As for GL, the show is getting exactly what it deserves, and I am now thinking that it won't hurt that much to see it last. In order for me to watch one episode of GL I have to throw out all my years of viewing the show and digest the storylines DK is writing for most of the cast. The destruction of many of my favorite characters is my number one pet peeve with the show right now. The propping of the oh so good Coopers is my second pet peeve. DK and EW should have been given the pink slip ages ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WOW surprised at all the comments for Days. I think it is getting some what better, But even I think Days is a done deal. No saops these days gain .2 or even.3 and maintains it. I don't understand why Hogan hasn't been fired yet. But Like everyone says, the fact that GL can beat Days and it's shown at different times all over and hell not even at all in some markets, is a VERY sad day for Days. What producer would let his own show tank so far so fast not not do nothing about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • These contract guarantees of 1 ep per month are ridiculous. How can you even have a story if your character apprars 4-5 times in a month? It's sad.
    • It's hard to tell with some actors appearing on average 4 times in a month whether they're recurring or just on a low guarantee contract. Someone recurring  like Beth Maitland can be used a lot for several months then disappear. So the monthly tallies aren't enough to go by.
    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy