Jump to content

Y&R: Kay and Jill


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

>> I agree though, Kay and Jill's mother/daughter BS needs to be undone and fast! I don't even really care how its done, really anything would be fine as long as they get back to hating each other again!

First of all, Y&R has to establish once and for all whether Cane is really Jill's son; because, to tell you the truth, I still have my doubts. I don't think anyone can undo the fact that Kay tried to switch the babies, BUT...does she know for certain that her efforts were successful? Who's to say someone who was close to the situation didn't realize what Kay was doing and switched them back?

(Where's Brock when you really need him?)

Undoing Jill-is-Kay's-daughter is virtually impossible, since I doubt Liz would've lied to Jill about that (nor would she have any reason to). So, I'm afraid to say, we're stuck with the two being related to each other. BUT, if we could 1) establish that Cane ISN'T Jill's son, 2) reveal that Cane has known this all along, and has used a phonied-up DNA test to worm his way into the Chancellor fortune, and 3) let Kay uncover all this before Jill can, then, this begs the question, what will Cane do about it? More importantly, how will he use that information to turn Kay and Jill against each other once more?

Two words: competency hearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

>> That whole sperm storyline really damaged Alden's reputation, to this day, I think it's the one storyline her solo tenure as HW is most identified with.

But, you know, I've never blamed Kay Alden for that particular storyline. At the time, something about that whole, sordid tale screamed "network/Bradley Bell interference" to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

>> Actually, it's VERY easy to undo. Liz just got A baby so she wouldn't have to be retconned into a liar.

So, Kay's long-lost daughter is still out there? For some reason, I'm not keen on that idea. I think it's because I'm scared it'll turn out to be Nikki, which is just...ugh, I couldn't even begin to digest that.

>> She had a tremendous EB/Victor crush, much like LML's with DD/Brad.

Wait, isn't Brad the one going around town, telling everyone's business? Man. If that's a crush, I'd hate to see what happens when LML hates someone.

Oops, nevermind. I just remembered what happened to Dru. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If TPTB ever choose to undo the retcon, then yeah.

THAT is the precisely idea TPTB should've utilized to begin with if they felt they absolutely had to do the idea at all. It would've been an perfectly acceptable retcon.

Examples: Douglas, Sherwood, Davidson, Rowell, Leon, Steinberg, Shackelford & Walton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks, Y&RWorldTurner, for the clarification, lol.

I wish to God LML would send the Paul/Maggie lust-thing to cheesy primetime cop shows where it belongs. You may have adored Tammy Lauren on your old show, "Homefront," Ms. Latham, but trust me, she wasn't the be-all and end-all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't really know if LML actually hates Jess Walton or if she's just a lazy, unimaginative hack who doesn't realize how talented Walton is? I distinctly remember the last time Jess signed a new contract she was planning to quit because of how backburned she'd become in the last couple of years but it was LML who begged her to stay...that could just be all rumor BS that some blogger cooked up or it could be fact. I don't know at this point but I will agree that LML's treatment of Ms Walton has been pathetic.

Back to undoing the Kay/Jill mother/daughter bond I actually think its easy: Liz Foster did adopt a baby, the baby was Jill...Kay's daughter remains a mystery (although if I wrote it she'd have died as a child) and Charlotte cooked up the Kay/Jill relationship to get back at Kay (remember when Charlotte was in town she and Kay did not have kind words for each other).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jess Walton said in an interview before the Phillip story began she was definitely leaving. All last year LML kept promising her a story, but nothing happened (plus all the Jack Smith stuff) so she was going. Then LML begged her to stay so she did, with the promise of this Phillip story. We all see how it worked out...

I think she probably felt forced to write for Walton. Firing her would definitely piss off Jeanne Cooper (and end any chance for screentime), Peter Bergman and probably all the other long term cast members. Not to mention the soap press. I see with a lot of actors LML will throw them a bone, but isn't interested in giving them a real storyline.

As for the Kay/Jill thing, I could handle the mother/daughter twist if the fallout were better. They can STILL dislike each other. There are people who've grown up with their parents and have a worse relationship. After all the history changing LML has done, I'd leave it alone. I'll settle for the characters being written true to form in storylines deserving of their talents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Sep 7 2007, 11:26 AM)
Jess Walton said in an interview before the Phillip story began she was definitely leaving. All last year LML kept promising her a story, but nothing happened (plus all the Jack Smith stuff) so she was going. Then LML begged her to stay so she did, with the promise of this Phillip story. We all see how it worked out...

I think she probably felt forced to write for Walton. Firing her would definitely piss off Jeanne Cooper (and end any chance for screentime), Peter Bergman and probably all the other long term cast members. Not to mention the soap press. I see with a lot of actors LML will throw them a bone, but isn't interested in giving them a real storyline.

As for the Kay/Jill thing, I could handle the mother/daughter twist if the fallout were better. They can STILL dislike each other. There are people who've grown up with their parents and have a worse relationship. After all the history changing LML has done, I'd leave it alone. I'll settle for the characters being written true to form in storylines deserving of their talents.

Smith really dealt a blow to one of daytime best characters, Jill Abbott. I think LML (not the only HW who's forced into writing a story or two) came up with a SL for Walton in July 2006, a few months after she was planning on quitting. There are some that feel that Cane is not Jill biological son. I'm on the fence b/c LML is known for changing the course of SL (making it up as she goes)/dropping SL. If you don't want Jill mother to be Katherine, then who should it be? Elizabeth? BTW: Was Elizabeth cured of her caner/tumor?

LML may or may not be a lot of things, but I really doubt that she would fire Walton. Plus, I doubt she cares about the opinions of the soap press. She already has SONY signing her paycheck. Expect to see a lot of Jill & Katherine in the coming months. Long time coming, huh?

Remember, LML is a "clever" woman. She has her own reasoning for doing things. She killed off John to send a "message" that a new sheriff's in town. LML MUST research Y&R's history regularly b/c she IS a very capable writer. Case in point: Knots Landing, Homefront & first year on Y&R. She's become lazy (resting on her laurels)/tired.

There were some reports at this year's Daytime Emmys that she lost a significant amount of weight. Is that true? If so, is LML ill? We must pray to Yahweh to help out LML. Case in point: Knots Landing, Homefront & first year on Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's the thing, I don't think LML can handle the scheduling and grueling pace a of a daytime drama. She comes from the world of primetime, where you only produce up to 24 episodes a season, that's a huge departure. I would have no problem if LML were a consulting producer on Y&R or a storyline consultant, but they've given her too much power and being both the show's head writer and executive producer has got to take a toll on her health, stress level, and personal life. She's truly burnt out, I definitely wouldn't be surprised if she left Y&R on her own accord in a year or so from now. She's known for leaving shows a year or two into her tenure also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy