Jump to content

The Tennis Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Bianca Andreescu was hungry and played like there was no tomorrow. Serena's serve let her down and her footwork stopped and by the time she was able to play up to her normal standard, it was too late for her.

Congrats to Andreescu!  I've known since the beginning of the season that she has been one who could snatch titles.

Let's not have a contest about who can be a drama queen because according to Kerber, Bianca has made a name for herself in that category as well, lol.

 

That second set was thrilling. It's rare to see a tennis match get that level of full-on, full-throated cheering and excitement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Soapsuds

    4184

  • Faulkner

    3003

  • DramatistDreamer

    2409

  • ChitHappens

    1615

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Lawd!  24 is there but Serena cant get across that finish line.  In finals, we aren't getting the game we get in the previous 6 matches.  No serve, no movement. Ugh!  Anywho, Bianca has a great game and I welcome the changing of the guard.  I did it with Martina, Steffi and now Serena.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Yes Bianca! She did it!  First Canadian (man or woman) to win a grand slam!  What a huge year for Canadian sports - with the Raptors winning their first Championship. And first person born in the 2000's to win a grand slam.   

 

Bianca's game is so good, and so fun to watch. I love her violent forehand swing, and her crouching swing.   That second set was so tense.  She was so close to winning and then Serena started to come back and you're just like, "She's only 19......what if she can't handle this pressure?"  But she prevailed and that's going to great for her experience, to go through a match like that where the crowd was rooting heavily for her opponent.  

 

#SheTheNorth #SheTheChamp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Not to mention, that match looked to be over in 3.  Med made it a thriller.  He gave viewers what they came to see. 

 

I was a bit peeved at Nadal for what appeared to be intentional breaks of Med's momentum by repeatedly stopping play.  But he paid for it with the shot clock violations so I'm good.  The ump was not playing with Nadal last night.  The double faults were a direct result of shorter prep time when serving.  The 40 second prep is over!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Nadal has violated that rule many more times than he has actually been caught.  Tennis is very selective about who they punish and it makes them look ridiculous as an organization. 

You have people who bash holes into umpires' chairs and pretending to fire guns getting smaller fines than players swiping at a blade of glass.

Also,

how is it determined that CSN was giving 'not enough effort'?  How is that determined?

You have verbal abuse warnings for some...fine, but let it be in a language or slang that an official isn't familiar with and the offender gets absolutely no warning, even if everybody heard it.

Pundits still complain about grunting as though it is solely a women's tennis issue when, at this point there are just as many male players who grunt (and loudly) during matches.

 

When the shot clock rule was introduced, I was one of those who dismissed it.  One, I really thought the effect would be negligible on the actual running time of the match (surface speeds, balls, etc. are far more important factors, imo) and I just didn't care and third, like many other of tennis' rules, many players who are often habitual offenders would find a way around it anyway. 

Now that the shot clock rule is here and in effect, however, I think that either tennis needs to apply and enforce it, equally and judiciously or just get rid of the rule altogether.  Tennis as a sport looks ridiculous nowadays.

 

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re: Serena/Bianca ratings: many may have thought Serena was finally gonna snatch No. 24 or were anticipating another meltdown like last year. Serena’s always going to be box office, though.

 

Not surprised at all about Nadal/Medvedev. That was a classic. Djokovic/Delpo in 2018 was a rout.

 

I’d be more interested in seeing the numbers over time. Many may have opted out on Nadal/Medvedev thinking it was going to be a cakewalk for Rafa, only tuning in when they got word it was becoming a tight match.

 

Back-to-back men’s Grand Slam finals with actual drama and stakes? When was the last time we had that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Last I saw she was teaching acting (?) at a college, but that was probably ten-twenty years ago.  She and Michael Levin had immense chemistry. This is one time where all the stuff about what was in character didn't matter to me - pairing them up just seemed like a no-brainer to me. The Joe pairing sapped Siobhan's spirit, and while I liked Rose/Jack, it was clear someone at the show did not.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Those are great ideas. That could adapt the whole claim that Gus was meant to be Rita's son. A child born of Ed and Rita and influenced by Roger would be great drama. I should probably have Philip's long-lost son be mid-twenties to make sure he's in a different peer group than Lizzie.  I do think Frank was an easy cut in the show's last decade, but I could at least say he was a good part of the show for his first 5-10 years and had natural relationships with the other Coopers, who were heavy in story. I don't hate Ron Raines, but there were no good times with him for me. He was more suited to Werther's Original ads. He seemed happiest when he got to have sweet scenes with little Lizzie, just doing grandpa stuff. I agree that Amanda returning at that time would have had more of an impact than a stunt cast for Alex. Joan was terrific, but the show couldn't afford her long term, and they needed a strong Spaulding long-term.  Great final moment for Alan. I never knew Taggert planned to bring Alan-Michael back. What might have been...
    • Not to mention, there are an equal number of men versus women in each opening: seven women and five men (including the core four Duprees).
    • Well, the head writer obviously knows nothing about writing romance.  He writes couples, but there is nothing romantic about them.  They just pair-up for a year or so, and then move on to somebody else.   He needs to give us a couple of long-term romantic pairings that struggle to get together, and make mistakes despite their deep love for one another -- couples like Victor and Nicki used to be, or like Doug and Julie, Bill and Laura, Alice and Steve, Rachel and Mac, Holden and Lilly, Tara and Phil, etc, etc.   Everything this dude writes is so superficial and lacks any kind of depth.  Even his silly business plots aren't really plots -- they are just musical chairs for who is CEO here, or there, and then over there.  
    • @P.J. No, you are not alone in this. I agree, the writers have overused "I'm a Dupree." I get it, but if they could pace themselves and use the term at more pivotal moments, I believe it would have more impact. Right now, they turn me off. A part of it is that they went the opposite way I felt they should have with the core four, Anita should be our favorite character, and I am sorry she is at the bottom of my list. Why do I care more for Nicole, the daughter who has everything, over Dani, the underdog? Like I said, it's an odd setup that I am getting used to.  I look forward to the in-laws interacting more and bonding away from the Duprees. I already root for Bill and Bradley, I see myself warming up to New Ted soon. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • A proper recast for Alex, who pulls the strings behind the scenes (and doesnt HATE Amanda like MarjAlex did) would be great..at that point I see her having her fingers in the pie just to make sure it all doesnt go to hell. My rival for Phillip would be my fan fiction of a kid of Ed and Ritas. Somehow Roger got a hold of him, made him think he was Alan's kid ( I would think Rita would push him as someone who could get a piece of the Spaulding) and secretly raised him to HATE Spaulding and work to take them all down...of course the truth comes out that he is Ed's kid, so we have a "bad" Bauer who is Phillip's match, and Rick is stuck in the middle trying to make a relationship with the brother who HATEs his best bud.
    • Does anyone know what happened to her post-RH? She seemed to evaporate after she left the show. Which is why I can believe she said negative things about the show--maybe it got her labeled as "difificult?" I thought she was a very good actress. I liked her performance as Siobhan. She had really good chemistry with Michael Levin. IMO, they were a bit gutless not to go for a Jack/Siobhan romance after Mary was killed off.
    • You might be going crazy and overthinking, because that's not how it goes.  Right now, it's the Hamiltons versus the Richardsons in the openings, with Alex Alegria/Buglioli/Ben Gavin with the Richardsons (Opening B), while Jen Jacob is with the Hamiltons (Opening A). Opening A: Brandon Claybon Timon Kyle Durrett Marquita Goings Jibre Hordges Jen Jacob Mike Manning RhonniRose Mantilla Arielle Prepetit Opening B: Alex Alegria Lauren Buglioli Sean Freeman Ben Gavin Trisha Mann-Grant Ambyr Michelle Colby Muhammad Keith D. Robinson By your reasoning, the opening should be (and would make zero sense): Opening A: Alex Alegria Lauren Buglioli Brandon Claybon Timon Kyle Durrett Sean Freeman Ben Gavin Marquita Goings Jibre Hordges Opening B: Jen Jacob Trisha Mann-Grant Mike Manning RhonniRose Mantilla Ambry Michelle Colby Muhammad Keith D. Robinson Arielle Prepetit
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy