Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

You missed a great match!  Everyone was picking Nadal to win in 4 sets. I thought Rafa would win but in 5.  The shots made by them were just jaw dropping good. The audience was pumped from the first point and the legends in the crowd were talking about the match before it even started. This is what tennis should be about ....not rope a dope tennis that Murray and Joker play. I agree with you Toups that tennis is in trouble with no real star coming up except for maybe Sasha, Thiem or Grigor. 18 seems like a lot but compared to Serena its nothing....LOL...although Roger holds the record for most on the men's side. I am surprised his parents were not there. They never miss a grand slam. I could go on and on about how great this match was. This match just proved to me how far behind American male tennis is ....Sock is nowhere near in the league of Roger or Nadal. Hell...even Sasha has already beat Roger and has come so close in beating Nadal......I think Thiem has beaten both of them. That's why I am so sick of ESPN and TC pimping the american males. They are so far behind that its embarrassing.

 

This year has started out really great. I cant wait for March and the Cal/Miami back to back tournaments leading up to the French.  I think Nadal has a good chance of winning it. He looked almost like his former self.

  • Replies 12.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Soapsuds

    4192

  • Faulkner

    3003

  • DramatistDreamer

    2412

  • ChitHappens

    1615

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

 

 

Forgot to mention....with this win Roger in my eyes is the greatest male tennis player of all time.

They reported that one of the twin males has already started swinging a racquet and he is left handed.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I was telling someone yesterday, that coaches and tennis tutors need to show this video to their pupils as a cautionary example of what NOT to do in this type of situation. This behavior needs to be 'nipped in the bud' before these players get to the Pro leagues, I've seen it happen way too many times and have seen plenty of 'near misses', it was bound to happen sometime.

 

Fortunately, the chair umpire is alright according to a message sent from his sister.  Imagine if a ball kid or a spectator had been hit that way, the ITF/Canadian Tennis Association might have been staring at a lawsuit!

Edited by DramatistDreamer
  • Members
Posted

@ChitHappens Shapovalov was DQed immediately by the umpire (per the rules) and GSM was called for Great Britain, which resulted in GB going onto the Quarterfinals as this was the 'Final Rubber' that was to decide who would move on, each country had been locked in a 2-2 tie before this final match.

 

Here's a follow up on Shapovalov.

 

 

  • Members
Posted

There needs to be some changes in the rules. Instead of a warning for ball abuse/racquet abuse there should automatically be a point penalty followed by game penalty for the second offense.....the warnings do nothing to deter this kind of behavior.

  • Members
Posted

And tennis needs to learn to apply the rules evenly. Shapovalov gets a $7,000 fine for nearly blinding a chair umpire, Venus got a $5,000 for skipping a press conference after a loss. 

 

Does anyone remember when Heather Watson got a $12,000 fine for slamming her racquet onto the grass court at Wimbledon? It was more for grass abuse.

 

Djokovic has narrowly missed hitting ballkids on more than one occasion and got a warning.

  • Members
Posted

SS, I think a warning for initial racket abuse in a match is sufficient. It's not realistic to say players cannot get angry.  Everyone should have the luxury of a warning before action is taken. 

  • Members
Posted

That's because he was #1 in the world. He gets special treatment. Wasn't he the one that should have been disqualified for grabbing a chair umpire? I remember Tennis Channel brushing it off as if it was nothing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Thanks for asking that!  Back when we had another major event upcoming (a party or the concert), I had intended to ask what everyone here was planning to wear.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy