Jump to content

MTV: The Hills - Discussion Thread


Tishy

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Audrina has done plenty of interviews and she's pretty much confirmed that its not 100% real. I dont mind it bc I dont go in watching it as a reality show. Ive been liking the focus on Audrina and Steph. Audrina deserves it as she was like Whitney and barely featured for the first couple of seasons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Honestly, i loved this show and laguna beach before i started meeting them and knowing people who know them. because i know how certin things go down and its nothing like on the show.

Brody is :wub: tho. I do tune him to star at him. And Audrina is a hottie. But other big issue with this show is its star - i cant stand Lauren!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lol I liked those shows too. They did some Newport Harbor thing last Christmas that was like "Christmas in NH" or something. It only last a few episodes. I don't know why they dropped it. It couldn't have had that bad of ratings.

Yeah I don't mind it either because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I cant stand Brody. I wish he'd leave adn I dont find him that cute at all.

LOL...as for Lauren, I like her but at least for you, there has been less focus on her this season.

1 thing that bugs me about the show is how they try to portray it as real but completely ignore the fact that these girls are celebritires. They arent normal people anynmore and are on tv shows, magazines, etc....Lauren is an aspring fashion designer on the show but in real life she has her own fashion line. Its still good tv but they ignore a major part of their lifestyles while at the same time still trying to reiterate that its all real. i just read something about this the other day. 1 thing that was funny was how Holly's mom was so shocked to see that she was back living with Spencer but doesnt she watch the tv show or go on the internet....lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I don't believe the timing of these events. There was news of Whitney working for Diane VF like two or three months ago. And at her going away party they mention that Spencer and Heidi are missing (wedding). But the "wedding" only broke about a month ago in the news. Sorry if that's really picky. But they make it seem like these events co-incide when one was reported WAY before the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldnt have expected them to be there as Whitney isnt friends with the couple. That line about Audrina mentioning them was probably edited in. I'm also confused about the timing bc I thought the show was filmed months in advance but then we see promos for the S/H wedding 2 weeks later. Oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

what a dissapointment the season finale was. They hyped up this Heidi/Spencer marriage over the past month with the first breakout of that news in the magazines and then they've been promoting it on MTV and turns out that wedding wasnt even legal and now Spencer postpones their second wedding, so the 2 still arent married after all these years. Show needs to get a new storyline for them bc its the same sh-t that keeps getting recycled.

Oh and how phony was the Heidi/Lauren reunion? They could have done alot better than that. The Hills is a mess and I wish it would have ended, especially with it spinning off into 2 new shows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Did any magazine.....US Weekly mainly...spoil that they aren't married? I heard about the original wedding and then that they were supposed to go to a courthouse. I wonder if the couple was saving the actual news for their decision for MTV? Or did it already break?

I liked the reunion. It was really weird, but I liked it.

I'm disappointed that they're extending season 4. I really don't know what else they'll do. They need to bring somebody else on. I think Audrina spilled that they're doing season 5, but maybe she this "extension" is what she was referring to. I'm looking forward to the City more than the Hills coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Oh I dont know. I didnt read that crap...lol. All I saw was the headlines all over the media

I didnt like them extending season 3 and dont like it here. Why not just call it a new season? Im not sure what to think of the City. Theres a reason why Whitney is barely featured and its bc she's boring. I like her but people want to see drama and she's definetly not about that. Im not so sure if she can carry her own show but I will check it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy