Jump to content

DAYS- A show without Bo, Hope, Steve, Kayla, John, Marlena?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Such as Langan. Langan focused all his energy on making John and Hope the new thing, viewers despised the pairing, but he didn't let up until he was fired. At the same time, he reduced Marlena and Bo to mere props, doormats for mercenary!John and Gina!Hope to step on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I used to watch DAYS consistently when it aired in the UK from 2000-2002, it started on Bo's wedding to Gina whilst Hope and Stefano were locked in a castle by Kurt, and it ended at the Coronation Massacre. It was SO much more interesting then than it is now. Sure, there may have been the debacle that was the Teen Scene, but there was still some great storylines and characters.

There wasnt SUCH a focus on supercouples then...Lucas was so much more interesting then, he was with Nicole, and he was scheming and conniving to get Sami put away for Franco's murder, there was the whole journey to Europe for Gina's funeral that led to the plane crash, again very interesting and used a lot of characters for one story...there was comedy, there was relationships and there was drama, all perfectly balanced. The show was a lot more balanced then.

Events like Jennifer's return whilst living in Ireland, and her and Jack finding their way back to each other were so interesting (although us UK viewers were yanked away from that story at the very beginning). There were interesting stories like the Abe/Brandon rivalry...Sami wasnt one half of a supercouple; we saw her with Austin, we saw her with Brandon...we saw Brandon and Angela...Kate/Nicholas/Victor, Craig and Nancy were interesting, Chloe was still a new character and she had a lot of potential, which was squandered when they put her in a boring triangle with Philip and Brady later on, which ultimately dulled down two very interesting characters; Brady and Chloe...Brady went from being an angst ridden, complex character to a boring one note half of a couple, whilst Chloe went from conflicted teen to bland beauty.

People may look back at those years with unfond memories, only choosing to remember the bad, but you have to admit, it sure beat the Reilly years.

At least back then there wasnt so much of an influence on supercouples...the Baby Switch storyline tested Bo and Hope, John and Marlena, Abe and Lexie, it was so much more interesting now where it's couples, not characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That time sucked because it nearly destroyed by ability to enjoy John & Marlena and Bo & Hope as four characters together, and as two couples together. Hope's treatment of Marlena was despicable, Hope became a bitch who blamed Marlena for every problem she had, and when she couldn't do that, she blamed Bo or Stefano. That's NOT Hope. And don't even get me started on Marlena even tolerating Brady's abuse for a second. I will go on for weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At least it was interesting, and provoked a reaction from viewers like yourself that wasnt "God, this is boring" or "So and so is on too much and so and so isnt on enough."

Even characters like Mickey and Maggie, Doug and Julie, were featured frequently, even if in a supporting capacity, they were still around. Maggie was Lucas' AA sponsor, Mickey was Nicole's lawyer.

I'm not saying it was perfect, but at least it was interesting and at least there was an attempt made at developing characters, for better or for worse.

I would rather DAYS took a risk, changed things up and failed, than remained stagnant and boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly!! It's a shame.

I also agree with Ponz too. Langan was very much against the supercouples. That much is clear. However, Days never did go through with breaking any couple up during that time. I have seen so many posts mention "the fans rebelled" or "there was fan backlash and it got changed" and that alone shows the problem Days has. They give in too much. There comes a time when a writer and producer have to ignore a fanbase and just do what they think it's best. Sometimes it will work and sometimes it won't but at least they would be trying. I am not saying they should ignore fans all the time but to keep giving in gives the fans far too much power and with so many fanbases already arguing for their couple or character to have more airtime it becomes a mess.

I am just so sick and tired of fanbases getting in the way of good story. The HW is so limited at Days. If things were the way they are now in the 80's and 90's, we may have never gotten J&M because Wayne's Roman was huge then or we would've never gotten J&J because Jack was a rapist early on and God knows it would've been like a Lumi/Ejami situation. Things were much more different then with fans then they are now. The patience was there and so was the ability to give new pairings and stories a chance before condemning them. Now, a story starts and right away the bashing begins or sometimes the bashing even begins with spoilers. The show has burned fans, obviously, but these fanbases have grown to be a major pain over the years and it may very well be the thing that ends up killing the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days over the last 20 years has always had strong supercouples, but they've rotated them..When i started watching in 87, there was Steve & Kayla, Shane & Kim, and Jack & Jennifer....in the early 90's you had John & Isabella, with Marlena and Roman returning to the show...Also there was still Jack&Jennifer, Bo&Carly, and then Bo&Billie....Austin&Carrie starting building momentum, and Hope returned....The late 90s and early/mid 2000s we had Carrie&Austin, Bo&Hope, John&Marlena, Jack&Jennifer, and Lucas&Sami started to gain a following...and this past year we lost Jack&Jennifer, but gained Steve&Kayla..

So it seems like there has always been 3 big supercouples on the show during my entire run....I love these couples together, but i would rather them have exciting stories than languishing on the backburner..Right now i'm happy with bope investigating the dimeras, and Steve/Kayla with baby Pocket..But i think its ridiculous that John/Marlena haven't really had a storyline all year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Anita vs. Leslie, bring it!
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy