Jump to content

DAYS/PSSNS: A Question for JER-Haters


Recommended Posts

  • Members

He would have to not only apologize, but admit that he has never had any respect for a) actors, B) past history, c) the adult-level intelligence of his audience, d) simple, basic professional scriptwriting guidelines, daytime or otherwise, or e) his waistline.

Then he would have to wander the earth with a rucksack and piano music like The Incredible Hulk.

Forever.

The man got lucky at Days and GL early on with good co-writers he got too much credit from (Curlee and Demorest) and then a good staff who he shamelessly rode into the ground (Days) and eventually, molded into his own staff of sub-Reilly hacks who wrote and sounded just like him for years and years. He has an ear for gimmicks and shock and nothing else, and never has. What success he had in the 90s was the result of the remains of a good writing staff who made his basic ideas work from outlines, and great actors who did their best, IMHO. Because otherwise, Marlena possessed by the Devil was laughable.

...And I must finally add, this is the man who doomed Days. Years ago. Not when he was on top, but when he kept it going, and after, when all they did was follow his trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

True. Its easy to find things to complain about when it comes to James E Reilly. But lets not forget that he was also the one who dared to try new things and write storylines that had never been seen before on Daytime. He was headwriter for DAYS during EIGHT whole years. Thats longer than any other headwriter. And he also created Passions and managed to keep it on NBC for over eight years too, despite low ratings. So obviously he can not be completely worthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reason Reilly's left is, unlike the others, he was willing to sell out every inch of intellect and soul in his writing towards a market-oriented, unhealthy daytime system of the 90s. He had no problem making junk for the masses and wrote for the audience in the way the networks regard them - as brainless cattle. He hit the demos, he ticked the boxes, he did everything right for the bosses, so he survived. The only thing he forgot was knowing how to write.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes it does mean something. James E Reillys writing is not of very good quality, that is correct. But Network Executives doesnt care about quality at all. They unfortunately only care about the demographics. If it wasnt for James E Reilly, then DAYS would probably have been cancelled already back in 1998 when its contract expired. But Reilly made DAYS a success during 1993-1998, so NBC decided to renew it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They renewed a sh!t show, that where my problem lies. And he made even more unwatchable, it was a farce, a parody, as you like it. Now come to think of it, they should have cancelled it. :)Days was once a brilliant soap, especially in Bill Bell days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is of course a matter of taste. Different styles appeal to different people. And obviously many people liked the JER style last decade since DAYS reached so high ratings during his writing back then. And also, DAYS was constantly number one in the demographics, which made it the most profitable show in Daytime. But nowadays people seem to be getting tired of it, which is understandable. The audience needs variation after all. So I hope DAYS can survive and maybe return to this "quality writing" that according to you occured before JER came to DAYS. But wishing cancellation on DAYS seems a little bit unnecessary. I still think DAYS have great potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have never been a big supporter of Reilly's work, but I do understand the history of the times. DAYS was in trouble, his plots helped raise the ratings and almost took out Y&R as the number one show. People ate his stuff up. I enjoyed the first couple of years, but I was burned out after the characters got stupid to make the plots move. The majority of the audience did not. This is entertainment, he did his job, on the right show at the right time.

I couldn't stand the show nearing the end of Aremid, and hated lady in a cage. I dropped the show for a long time because it was so stupid to me. But the audience grew even larger the stupider and more over the top the show became. It wasn't for me.

GH has always been my main show, and I also remember while Reilly was making DAYS into a gothic, campy soap, Labine and Guza round one was making adult, intelligent and compelling drama that was about character. After some vapid GH stuff when Monty returned, I was so happy when Riche and Labine's stuff started airing. They hit their show and its fans at the right time, with the right stories. I can't hate Reilly for his success, even if he does not write the stuff I want to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course, Rudolpho, that it's a matter of taste. I hope you didn't get me wrong - I wasn't trying to change your taste or anything of the sort.

I wonder who those people were who liked him? Devil possesion, people buried alive and so on... Teens mostly probably and so on, they viewed it as a comedy, a pardoy as I said, not as something serious and worth while. I think people were just drawn to see the new stuff daytime has to offer, but soon they realised it was silly, unbelievable, badly executed and they all left.

I don't wish for Days to be cancelled. I think that it has potential, but the question here is - who will be the writer who will use that potential? If someone isn't found soon, the show will have its days numbered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont care about JER 1st run.his 2nd run was pure crap,with nothing but gimmicks and triangle to try and hide the fact he cant write a decent,character driven storyline to save his life.he ruined the show,re-wrote history and ruined all of the characters.I am glad he's gone and only hope he will never get the chance to ruin any other show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually I think you got me a little wrong there. I would say that my taste is more similar with your taste. I certainly wouldnt mind at all if DAYS had a more serious and dramatic approach instead of half campiness and stupid shocks and special effects that still annoys many people with its presence. The second run of JER on DAYS was indeed a big failure. The show does need to get away from that kind of storytelling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • So today on The Young in the Restaurants, Nick arrives at GCAC for a workout at the never seen gym when who should be at the table oddly placed in front of the entrance but Phyllis. Nick joins her and Stafford begins acting. Hand gestures, weird line readings, repeating phrases and odd facial expressions-just her normal shtick- but for script reasons Nick finds her manner unusual. Meanwhile Kyle  and Audra meet up at the empty CL and begin bantering. Audra boasts the Vibrator has a great range of products that will disrupt the marketplace-yes in a matter of weeks,Ms Charles has set up a complete company-staff,R&D, product approval, marketing, distribution, w./o ever leaving a restaurant. And more incredibly,Kyle is worried about the threat to Jabot. They need to put a laught track with these scenes.
    • I hated Mick, his mama and their whole raggedy ass family so I’m glad Dyer keeps yapping, hopefully the character remains gone. I never commented on Sonia and Bianca’s exit but I thought it was well done, never been a Sonia fan but it was touching seeing her Bianca ride off with Bex and the new baby. The episodes with Martin’s funeral and Sonia comforting Stacey then Stacey and Ruby finally coming to an understanding were great as well. Nicola held it down for a few weeks with this killed Harry’s girlfriend story and the actor playing Harry has improved quite a bit, I like him and Gina together and his friendship with Kojo. I was hoping for a bigger renovation for The Vic but I do like the refurbished look. The episode where they first opened back up was really good too, great use of Nigel, Billy and the history of East London I really love the stuff they’ve done with Avani and the actress has realy shined but I hate nuVicki’s perv step son and weirdo husband. I really wanted Ravi to whoop both their asses. I’m so happy Cindy is back, I thought she’d be gone longer. Loved her helping Lauren give birth, I felt bad they still kicked her out at the end. Her blackmailing Kathy and Ian was well deserved and I like that she snagged The Albert and still exposed Kathy’s affair with Harvey. Not a fan at all of Harvey and Jean but I did enjoy all the fallout, especially Kat dragging Harvey, Freddie hugging Jean and making her cry. Ive really enjoyed the Clenshaw era so I’m sad to see him go but I’m willing to give the new show-runner a chance. I wonder how many more exits and new additions we’ll see.  
    • Same. I love like a lot of the other characters she has so much potential and possibilities. I also love she is not a shrinking violet. And most definitely not perfect.   Lol. Okay, I give you that. But I'm a horror fan so I ain't hating on her for being one, too.    Well like I said when this story started...those kind of backrooms DO exist even now. The workers even run to get the gamblers food orders so they can completely focus on losing all their money the game. I appreciated Randy clarifying that the other day when Mona was asking him about the machines. Of course, that said...I guess the question is if we will see the rest of the casino.    Same, but especially the bold.
    • One of the things that I found refreshing about Ryan's Hope when I discovered it on SoapNet was that for the most part, Delia was the only female character whose life seemed to revolve around getting and keeping a man, and it was clearly viewed as a character flaw. Because by the 2000s, I feel like fully half the female characters on the soaps at that time were obsessed with trying to snare some vacuous lunkhead. Up that to like 85% of them if we're talking Days Of Our Lives or Passions.
    • Yes, a few months before Wanda De Jesus, actually. Shortly after the Dobsons took over again, Rosa just magically reappeared as if she'd just been offscreen in the Capwell kitchen for the past four years. I just started watching this from the beginning again last year and I will agree with past posts that there really does seem to have been a reboot of sorts in January 1985. To me, it seemed like the four performers who really seemed to set the tone for the new wittier, more sophisticated direction were Nicolas Coster, Louise Sorel, Lane Davies and Judith McConnell.
    • You're right about the potential many of those stories could have had. The execution was more of an issue. Something never clicked for me in Angelique's present-day adventures - some of them I actually found very irritating due to the slanted writing and her voice being overshadowed. It took the Leviathan story for me to enjoy her in that timeline. I wish they had just left Peter/Vicki to the past and used that to inform who Vicki became when she returned, instead of bringing him back.
    • Thanks @slick jones I appreciate the interviews you share.
    • Download isn't working for me either.  With that said, thank you for all the work you have done!
    • @P.J. Well, it wasn't her first award. I am sure she has written books, and spoken at colleges, and gotten some notoriety from it. Most importantly, she is fulfilled. Something Dani is not.  @Paul Raven Exactly, it does not ring true to me. Dani has that big personality because she is masking pain. And she probably clung to Bill because he made her feel smart and important (at one point). There are ways to add more layers to her.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy