Jump to content

SOD Interview: Thaoo Penghlis


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Tony DiMera is getting out of prison early and will be back in Salem on May 24. And if Thaoo Penghlis's web site (www.thaoopenghlis.com) - which got 20,000 hits in one week after the news broke on the 4/17 issue of Digest - is any indication the audience will welcome his return.

"There's been such a fan base that has been wanting the character back," observes the actor is taking his fifth trip back to Salem since creating the role of the Count in 1981.

"I feel like sometimes I'm put somewhere on the shelf where they can reach for me later in case they need me, whih is good. Someone said to me, " They're bringing in the big guns.' There are certain anchor characters that you know you can depend on to hook the audiene in. I think DiMeras are that way because they're kind of bigger than life."

Penghlis is looking forward to reteaming with Joseph Masolo (Stefano), with whom he last shared scenes in 1995. "I just did version of A Man for All Seasons and Joe came to see it. He said, 'Oh, it would be great if you and I could work together again.' From the beginning, the main thing with us has been the work. It's not about the paycheck; that will buy certain things, but in the end, Joe and I are old school."

He'll also be back on-screen with good pal Leann Hunley (Anna), who last appeared in 1986. "There is a special kind of connetion that I have with Leann," he says. "She's one of the great spirits that I ever known in my life. There's no hidden stuff in her loset that is ugly. She is who she is, something kind of wonderful."

Penghlis is curious to see how the show is differene under Head Writer Hogan Sheffer as opposed to former Head Writer James E. Reilly. "To be killed four times in one year, being pulled out of a sewer, landing in prison? This was not a writer who was showing love to me." he reflects. "This new writer seems very onfident. Hopefully, there will be some love, where I felt with the previous writer, love was always out of the picture. This is a writer I want to please, certainly, and help along."

Mainly, he just hopes it all goes well. "You can't always go back, but we're actors: we're supposed to be magicians." Penghlis says. "Hopefully, it'll help the show and excite people to come back because it's a good show annd they're wonderful characters."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Way to throw in an anti JER jab Thaoo, he really did a number on your character the second time around....Tony never should have been the mastermind of the SK storyline...it just went downhill from there..I'm excited that Thaoo is so happy to back working with JM and LH..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tony was annihalated under JER's last run, and in a many senses in his run before that too. I'm glad that Thaoo doesn't seem, at least here, like he is the one that is bringing the power to the character, he gives credit to Sheffer and says that he would like to please Sheffer. It should be a team effort between writers and all the actors. They really feel the DiMeras are going to bring life back into the show, but it must accompany the *writing*!! Despite the utter crap that was Tony we last saw, I am hoping for the best this time around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      Why didn't Steve respect Monica and Jeff's decision?  I get he's Jeff's father, and that's how it came out, but I don't like the ethics of the story.
    • Question: Jon-Michael Reed's review of 1977 is up in the retro soap section.  It includes a fleeting reference to comedic scenes between Jeanne Cooper and Julianna McCarthy regarding “Kay's would-be beau, Ralph the Plumber”.  Could someone please fill me in will more details? I forgot that Kay and Liz were friendly before Jill stole Kay's husband.  And the thought of Liz playing a comedic scene blows my mind, because I only recall her being dour both in demeanor and wardrobe.  
    • I said on Twitter on Friday when Leslie mentioned Chicago that perhaps she might be related to one of Anita's bandmates. Since we hardly know anything about Leslie's childhood background. In addition, Leslie said she grew up listening to The Articulettes….
    • There was a scene in the past week or two with Leslie looking at some papers and mementos, which included an invitation or souvenir from Alan's memorial service or funeral -- it was dated as November 2024. Me just guessing but it seems to me that Martin's nightmares about the accident are from something longer ago than November.
    • ah thanks! do you know who the third one was in the blonde? the fifth one i know ive seen before in the brown wig but i forgot, and then ive never seen the psychic one before lol
    • I felt for Ted early on but as the story unfolded it has changed my opinion on him. To know he was cheating while his wife was struggling to give him a baby is a lot to deal with. Plus, this happened ages ago and still he's paying Leslie off and threatening her to leave town.  What really caused me to lose him in this episode was how even though he was busted, he still refused to take responsibility and come clean and the way he talked to Martin and Eva was terrible. To tell Smitty he better get Martin away from him when that is his SON who he used to cover up his affair? That is true dog behavior. Ted seems upset he got caught but I'm not seeing the remorse I would need to want Nicole to forgive him. I'm curious how I'll feel after Ted gets to talk to Nicole but I need him to fix it with the rest of the family as well.
    • I'm sorry. I well remember Jake doing Doris but I have no independent memory of the story around it.  Krystle with a K Lake, sure, both Tony the Tuna stories & NOT.  And, Jake also impersonated a woman named Bunny Eberhardt but he didn't know she was a woman so there was no drag. This weekend I re-watched Kevin & Mac, GH, and my strong impression is exactly what it was when I watched it in real time: They did not let them look very pretty. Of course, I think the best ever drag on GH was Alexis posing as the Q butler.  In a different use of drag at AW one Halloween, Jensen Buchanan went as Charlie Chaplin & Judi Evans went as, I think, a male gypsy.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm not sure who wanted them to dump REUNION & instead do a "Dallas-like daytime show" but it seems that it def came from NBC to AW through Rauch, so, yes, it absolutely could have been his (cough-another-stupid?) decision!!!! I've just begun the new Lisanti book so maybe I will find out. (I waited for the kindle version to come out.) I would apologize for being so critical & so sarcastic, too, but, well, I'm not actually sorry!  Silverman was NOT a friend to AW.  And, I believe the critique is on point & deserved! I wanted to explain why I think the timing is off for the 90 minute show to be a reaction to the GH Luke & Laura story & its hype. Because, for sure, networks & production companies did react to it! The first 90 minute show was Monday, March 5, 1979.  And, there was some unknown amount of time ahead of that with people arguing about it & then, planning it.  The Luke & Laura wedding was mid-November 1981.  They were on the run from Frank Smith & stayed overnight in Wyndham's Dept. Store early August 1980. 
    • terrible at using forums and inserting photos, but jake in another world had a drag persona named doris, anyone know the episode or year? http://www.anotherworldhomepage.com/ffad19.jpg
    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy