Jump to content

American Idol: Discussion Thread


R!ck

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I was just refering to how you can say he is gay. I thought those were against the rules. Oh well....the rules for SON are so foggy..who really knows...LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think that those things only apply to soap stars, LoL. I mean, people are downright VILE to certain celebrities in the Off-Topic forum.

The only reason we're nice to soap stars is because it's likely that they visit our forum, many of them. Blake Lewis? Rosie O'Donnell? Paris Hilton? Doubtful.

That said,a picture tells a thousand words. Blake grabbing another man's crotch naturally will raise questions. Also, I think there's a difference between saying "he's gay" and "OH MY GOD WHAT A NASTY FLAMER!" The latter is pretty offensive to EVERYONE, whereas the other statement is pretty simple and un-sensational. Why would saying Blake's gay be considered 'bashing' or anything similar, anyway? Is it an insult to be gay? Surely not! LoL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If he's not, great. What if someone referred to me as 'straight' and I wasn't? No big deal.

Fact is, he grabbed another man's crotch in a picture. Naturally, that's going to cause a bit of discussion. He knew it, himself. I'm sure he's aware of the rumors and he still grabbed his crotch, anyway. By grabbing Chris's cock, he's obviously comfortable enough with himself and his own sexuality to do that without worrying about people's reactions, so I doubt he'd be upset with people questioning it. He's confident enough with himself -- obviously. The cocky cock-grabber! LoL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here they are again for your consideration.

1. The flaming of members or staff at SON is not allowed. Flaming is completely unacceptable and will be dealt with immediately. No matter what that person has said to you, there is no reason for you to go off on him or her. If you have a problem with something posted, use the Report to moderator feature.

The "calling out" of members is not allowed. If you have a problem with a member, contact a staff member or the SON administration. Should one "call out" another SON member to bash them or to fight with them, they will be banned.

2. No trolling. A troll is someone who comes into a community and posts inflammatory, rude, repetitive or offensive messages designed intentionally to annoy and antagonize other members or disrupt the flow of discussion. Additionally, trolls do not contribute to the discussions at hand, and join only to link to other sites. Anyone found to be a troll will have their account deleted immediately.

3. Respect others on the board. There's no need to resort to name calling just because they may disagree with you. Should a member be found to be harassing another via board posts, PMs or e-mail sent through our boards, that person will have his/her account banned immediately.

4. The decisions made by the staff at SON are final. There are times that SON will make decisions that everyone may not agree with, but it is our job to regulate the board. If you are in disagreement with how the Soap Opera Network and its Community Forums (SON Boards) are managed, please contact the Administration via [email protected]

Posts created through the message boards relating to this topic will immediately be deleted.

5. Warnings will be removed at the discretion of the SON staff. Do not PM a staff member asking when they are going to remove your warning.

6. SON does not allow spamming. If you're going to create a thread or respond to one, make sure there is a point. Responses with only smiley's, or the simple "Lol, I agree" or "yep" is considered spamming in the main discussion areas and will result in a warning. If you'd like to get your post count up, there is a designated area for that, which is the Playing Field.

7. If you have any account problems, always an administrator before creating an additional account. Having more than one account is not allowed at SON and will result possibly all of the accounts being banned. However, it is quite reasonable that one may create an additional account due to various reasons. The best thing to do is contact a one of the Administrators to get your issue resolved as soon as possible. Members found to have more than one account will have to inform the admin of which account they intend to use.

8. Porn or general nudity of any form is not allowed on the forums. Any person found to be posting porn will be banned.

*****RULES AND GUIDELINES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE*****

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just read Paula Abdul broke her nose trying to avoid falling on her dog. She will still be on air tomarrow night.

There is also rumors of Blake singing a duet with Katherine McPhee. I guess her fans sent letters to Idol and there was an outcry to have her on the show and the rumor is that Blake starts off a song like he normally does (beatboxing I'm sure) and then Katherine comes in halfway through and the song becomes one of her songs.

Anyway, just thought I would post these. Thought they were interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, if the rumor is true, it isn't supposed to happen until Wednesday night during the results show.

In regards to Paula, she wasn't hospitalized and it wasn't said to be serious but we'll see how she looks tomarrow night.

I am curious to find out who is performing as guests Wednesday night. I know they are starting at 7:30 with a red carpet thing. i heard Kelly will be performing. I also heard Daugthy was performing but not sure if it's Tuesday or Wednesday night. Anyone hear anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here are some Idol song spoilers for tomarrow night if anyone wants to know (just play the clip on the page):

http://www.myfoxaustin.com/myfox/pages/New...mp;pageId=3.1.1

Here is what the reporter says for anyone that wants to know (don't look if you want to be surprised):

^

^

^

^

^

^

Blake is singing first and is singing:

1.) "You Give Love A Bad Name" by Bon Jovi (more beat boxing....ugh)

2.) "She Will Be Loved" by Maroon 5 (well, he did good with Maroon 5 last week so why not)

3.) Winning Idol Single from Songwriting Contest

Jordin sings second and is singing:

1.) "Broken Wing" by Martina McBride (superb choice, one of my favorites performances of hers this year)

2.) "Fighter" by Christina Aguilera (strange choice, I guess this is what she hinted at when she said she would be pulling something young and fresh out)

3.) Winning Idol Single from Songwriting Contest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ooh, I'm worried about "Fighter" for Jordin. I can see it sounding a little pitchy... and I don't like that song, LoL. Hopefully she'll surprise me! It's also a bad idea, IMO, to try and tackle a Christina Aguilera song, because you just can't rival Christina's vocals and runs. When Katharine McPhee did one of Christina's songs, it sounded EMBARASSINGLY bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I believe Cecile was intentionally used for comedic elements maybe twice. I mean, start with her being royalty from where? Tanquir!!! LOL From the first moment it's a gag, isn't it? And, her kidnapping Cass? I mean does a serious character do that? Well, literally, if you go another way & it's horror, sure. And, what you describe, a food fight, yeah, it's going to be played for laughs.
    • Y&R 1976 Pt 2 Bill is overjoyed when Jill arrives home with grandson. But Kay is furious and checks into legal action, only to find that there are no grounds (the check was returned). Brock Reynolds, Kay’s son from her first marriage, convinces her she can be the baby’s godmother and provide for him out of love.  But just as she’s starting arrangements to do this a legal petition arrives stating that Phillip Chancellor Foster is a rightful heir to and is now claiming his share of Phillip Chancellor’s estate. Jill has to do this, as the Foster family’s finances are now more precarious than ever. In fact, Liz, unable to get her factory job back, has secretly started working for Kay as her housekeeper. Jill explains to Kay that she has to do this for her baby’s sake but will drop the suit immediately if Kay puts it in writing that she will provide for them. Kay, however, retorts that Jill is the one who can’t be trusted—after all, she went back on her agreement to let Kay have the baby. Despite her attorney’s advice to work out an out-of-court agreement, Kay — insists on seeing this through. When Jill takes her little son to Phillip’s grave -on the Chancellor estate, Kay runs her off the property. In court, the geneticist testifies that Phillip could have been the baby’s father, but that Brock could have been, also. Jill then testifies that Phillip was the only man she was ever intimate with, and then only once; that Phillip decided on an immediate divorce from Kay and marriage to her, Jill, so that his baby could have his legal name. But Kay’s lawyer brings up the “dead-man statute,” which holds that conversations with a deceased person are not admissible as evidence because he can’t defend himself. When the  judge upholds this statute, Jill comes close to being held in contempt of court.  Brock takes the stand and substantiates Jill’s testimony that although he and Jill lived together for a time before her marriage to Phillip, they were never initimate. But the judge rules in favor of Kay; little Phillip’s claim is rejected. Jill emotionally tells the judge he has denied a child a decent life and a man  his dying wish.   Brad is told by Dr. Snapper Foster,his brother-in-law that his condition, nephritis of the optic nerve, is stable. The optic nerves are still swollen, but since his headaches have stopped he should continue his cortisone treatment. Brad is still firmly insistent that Leslie not be told.  From the moment they meet, Lance and Laurie charge the air around them with static. They find each other arrogant and egotistical, but when Lance needs a date for his trip to London, he calls Laurie, and she accepts. The pilot of Lance’s private plane cryptically suggests that Laurie turns his boss on because she seems turned off by him. This seems to hold true for Laurie, too. By the end of their London stay, Lance and Laurie have come to a better understanding of each other. Lance tries to tell her that, with talent of her own, she should not be jealous of Leslie. She tells him she has a book coming out, but it won’t be published under her own name. She explains further that she was an outgoing child and her parents didn’t understand that she needed as much attention as the introverted Leslie did. (Laurie has always felt she existed in Leslie’s shadow. Les is married to the man Laurie wanted, and is a successful concert artist, with the fame and recognition Laurie has tried so desperately to achieve. Laurie’s first book, a sexploitation novel, was a failure, and this new book is a novel based on Leslie’s nervous breakdown and recovery—something Leslie is trying to put behind her.) Gwen Sherman, now Sister Magdellen, will soon take her final vows, but still feels God holds her past against her, because nobody could possibly believe that a prostitute could be pure enough to become a nun. She finds her accidental meetings with Greg Foster (they were once in love) increasingly meaningful to her, and she begins to dream of Greg holding her in his arms. Finally, in torment and uncertainty, she tells the Reverend Mother she’s leaving the convent. But on the day of her release, Greg arrives with one of the convent orphans unconscious in his arms.The boy had fallen from a fence outside. When the  boy, Ramon, who had not spoken a word since his arrival, comes to, asking for Sister Magdellen, Gwen sees this as a sign from God and accepts her vocation. She will take her final vows and then enter nurses’ training.  Stay tuned...
    • I was just about to compose a post where I mention this period AW reminds me of JFP's  time on GL (1993-95) where it just reeked of cynicism and desperation. OR ATWT during Black and Stern. The common denominator is P&G. They allowed this stuff to go on.
    • I think the first 4-5 years have many strong spots, some beautiful writing, and I didn't find it that hard to watch, but one of the main issues with the show for me - and this just gets worse - is many of the characters we are told to root for I find extremely unlikeable. 
    • I don't see the people who were brought into AW around 1986 as being that different from JFP, but I don't feel like going back and forth either.
    • Agree to disagree. I think they cared. I think at times fans underestimate both the creative types & the execs. Certainly there can be specific times & specific people when ego & hubris are huge issues. But, basically, and most of the time the people involved very much want things to work. I'm not saying you don't have your Brian Frons or even your JFPs & your Susan D. Lees. We know at the end Chris Goutman had lost his way.
    • Pure bull, those scenes were.ere! The whole Liam story is going to end in disaster, just like Brad's other stories.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Joey and Vanessa's scenes are boring. Get Vanessa away from him. Anita and Eva scene was great too! Lots of good scenes in today's episode.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy