Jump to content

DAYS: TV Guide interview with Stephen Nichols


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Here's a link to a TV Guide interview with Stephen Nichols:

http://entertainment1.sympatico.msn.ca/Bel...5-ED6D34850784}

Patch work

Stephen Nichols returns to the role that made him a daytime superstar — and this time he’s not leaving.

If there is any doubt that the ‘80s are back, you need to look no further than Days of Our Lives.

While most soaps mishandle superstar comebacks, the Global/NBC sudser welcomed back Stephen Nichols — arguably the biggest star the series has ever produced next to Deidre Hall (Marlena) — as Steve “Patch” Johnson earlier this fall. He returned after a 16-year absence by paying homage to the anti-hero’s history with a spellbinding story that not only pleased old-time fans, but also seduced a new generation of viewers.

Of course, it helped that Days also brought back Steve’s love of life, Mary Beth Evans (Kayla), at the same time. This allowed the actors — who were unsuccessfully re-teamed on General Hospital as Stefan and Katherine in the ‘90s, but who were a big hit independently — to bring integrity, nostalgia, catharsis and closure to their pre-empted love story that abruptly ended in 1987, when Nichols left the soap and Steve was presumed dead.

We caught up with the Emmy-nominated actor just before Nichols embarked on his holiday vacation to spend time with his wife and three children.

TV Guide: Were you scared that Days might have screwed up Steve and Kayla’s comeback? After all, it’s been 16 years!Stephen Nichols: Yeah, we felt a responsibility to bring these characters back in a way that would live up to what we had done in the past. The writing is an integral part of that, and we came in during a transition [head writer Hogan Sheffer joined the soap around the same time]. But all things considered, I think writing staff has done an excellent job.

TVG. Did playing Steve again after all these years feel like riding a bike?

SN: In some respects, yes, but for the five months there was the memory loss issue and I was playing more of a Nick/Steve hybrid. Now I'm back to riding the bike.

TVG: What’s it like wearing the “patch” again?

SN: A pain in the ass, but I love it. [Laughs].

TVG: Fans aren’t warming up to the Billie/Patch flirtation — what are your feelings?

SN: I love working with Julie Pinson (Billie), but it was never going to happen with Billie, Steve and Kayla because Steve was Nick at the time.

TVG: Why do you think Stefan and Katherine didn’t work on GH when you and Mary Beth were re-teamed?

SN: Mary Beth and I were indelibly identified as the couple Patch and Kayla, and those two characters were direct polar opposites of Katherine and Stefan. Number two, there was a richer history with Laura and Stefan.

TVG: Is it odd having Judi Evans on the show as a different character and not as Steve’s sister?SN: Now that she’s not going to be playing Bonnie anymore [Judi Evans is leaving the series], maybe the door is open for her to come back as Adrienne. We had some great stuff together as brother and sister.

TVG: What’s the mood on the set now that Hogan Sheffer is on board?

SN: Everyone seems to be excited! When they get their scripts, they’re eager to see what’s in store. I, for one, knew of Hogan’s work on ATWT because I watched Mary Beth on it. I always thought that the writing was some of the best in daytime.

TVG: How has daytime changed since joined daytime in the ‘80s?

SN: Dramatically.

TVG: If Patch and Kayla ever remarry, do you want another splashy wedding for the characters?

SN: Hell yes! And this time on a battleship with a banner behind us that says, “mission accomplished!”

TVG: Do you keep in touch with anyone from GH, or still watch the show?

SN: Yes, Tyler [Christopher; Nicholas] and I speak once in a while. Kimberly McCullough (Robin) and I run into each other at filmmaker events.

TVG: Finally, why do you think Steve — and Patch and Kayla — resonate with viewers after all this time?SN: Steve has always been a unique character. Don’t ask me why — it’s a mystery, but I likes it. Patch and Kayla have a very strong connection to each other, and a lot of that has to do with the friendship between Mary Beth and me. There's a lot of trust and I'm sure that comes through. We're not afraid to fail with each other.

http://entertainment1.sympatico.msn.ca/Pat...l_NB.htm?isfa=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOVE HIM!

So happy he is pleased with the writing at DAYS! Too many actors that have returned and then left just hated the writing, this is a refreshing change!

I am still amazed at how much DAYS has turned itself around, it REALLY is trying hard to return to its roots and bring some respect back to NBC Daytime!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nichols played the very complex Stefan Cassadine so well that he made me a fan of his character. If he's ever fired by K. Corday or chooses to quit, I hope GH snatches him up in a hot second. They made the mistake of killing off Katherine Bell. We don't know with certainty that Stefan is really dead & it'll be great if he returned. His scenes with T. Christopher, G. Francis. M.B. Evans & C. Towers were amazing! He belongs on GH! Let the GH/Days casting wars continue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH made the character of Stefan turn into a joke and his death was played out just like that. That hospital room scene was pathetic. Like they did frequently, GH didn't know what to do with him and they ended up mocking the character and ruining him.

This interview was nice. Their returns were a bit shaky at first but both ME and SN are so capable they made it work. Now it is only getting better and I hope it continues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. Some of the lines that Mary Beth Evans was given for Kayla - cringeworthy. But the great thing about these two is that they are able to do a lot of acting without words. At times, that is all that made things bearable. Things are MUCH improved now and I am glad to see them finally able to exercise their acting chops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOVE him. Loved him as Patch way back when, loved him as Stefan (which he totally made his own, despite the HUGE shadow cast by his role on Days), love him back on the show where he got his start.

And every post or interview he makes just reinforces my view of him as a funny, gracious person. He's a class-act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Community Posts

    • I hear what your saying regarding Carrie Brady's place on the canvas. There is no arguing that. As I think I was saying poorly above, Karen was introduced during a transition period very early in Riche's run (as was Jagger). There were a lot of things that happened during that period that feel very against the soap opera grain. For example, David Langdon, Monica's ex and Dawn's father, arrives in Port Charles in a medical story where Monica inserts herself with the intention of telling David that Dawn was their daughter. David dies suddenly and Monica never reveals this information to David. This feels very untraditional. Similarly, the whole Joseph Adkins arc with Bobbie writing to a murderer and the women of Port Charles all fawning over his book is not something I felt was the type of story soaps in 1992 did. Similarly, introducing a character like Karen without any family ties and anchoring a younger part of the story with another outsider Jagger wasn't how things would typically work (effectively) on the soap.   I think my issue with the idea that Brenda had a direct goal is that is all there was to her. She had nothing to her outside of that in early 1993. Jagger had wanting to find his family. Karen was working to get into medical school. Brenda had Jagger, who only wanted her when he couldn't have Karen. Even Ruby called Jagger out on this. Brenda's point of view was so limited. The fact that she nearly gets bested by Jenny Eckert of all people in a confrontation in March, 1993, is pretty wild given how milquetoast Jenny is.  I can see why you would think Karen was taking a middle of the road approach to things. It might not have been presented well, but her pursuing her career and going to college was going to come first. Working at Kelly's and maintaining her grades was going to come before her romance with Jagger. With Rhonda around, meddling in her life, Karen definitely had more reason to be conflicted. Rhonda saw Karen's relationship with Jason as the key to Karen's success, both by marrying into a wealthy family and by building a network of connections in Karen's career field.  Having watched some of her "General Hospital" run, I would like to at the early years of Karen's run on "Port Charles" to see how that all this continues in terms of her characterization. I think Karen remains very passive romantically deferring to Courtney Kanelos, who was just a much stronger adversary for Karen than Brenda was based on where Brenda was in her journey given that Courtney had Neil which tied her to the entire Scanlon clan. I do remember Karen having some outbursts, but I vaguely think that Shayne's Karen could also be pushed to her limits and she would fire back. This just wasn't her modus operandi as it was for characters like Courtney and early Brenda.  In Brenda's defense, I think part of the issue was the underdevelopment of her character. I think there was an intent on either Levinson's (or Riche's) part to craft Brenda as a "poor little rich girl" type who had no moral compass because her father was a business tycoon who ignored her and had loved Julia's mother more than her mother. If this was true, and the intent to solicit sympathy, or least empathy, for Brenda, it wasn't played enough for this to be effective. Brenda rejected Julia both in terms of her role as a parental figure and any sisterly advice she gave.  I would even go further and say that the issues I have with the Brenda/Karen rivalry were inherit to Bill Levinson's writing. By comparison, if you look at what was being done in the other female rivalries, the issues were mostly consistent. Jenny and Julia, for example, had the potential to be interesting but Julia was so passive and Jenny was sound brash and unfeeling that there was no one to root for. Also, the rivalry between Tiffany and Bobbie took Tiffany into a very narrow view with her solely trying to secure custody of Lucas at the cost of everything else including her friendship with Bobbie and Tony as well as her marriage to Sean. I'd be curious to see if Levinson had similar issues when he was at "Loving," but I'm spacing at the moment.   
    • Neil Patrick Harris and David Burtka talk new show, ‘Drag Me to Dinner’ l GMA  
    • Jimbo & Alexis Spill Tea on Heidi's Drama (Unaired)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Do these tournaments still test for COVID? https://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/65794974?xtor=AL-72-[partner]-[bbc.news.twitter]-[headline]-[news]-[bizdev]-[isapi]&at_link_origin=BBCWorld&at_medium=social&at_ptr_name=twitter&at_campaign=Social_Flow&at_link_type=web_link&at_format=link&at_link_id=085D161A-01FB-11EE-91C3-39FFD772BE90&at_campaign_type=owned&at_bbc_team=editorial
    • What's truly Kafkaesque is how deluded he seems about himself and his views, and how when challenged to drill down in what he's actually saying about 'truth' and 'moderation' he just cycles back around to doublespeak. What he means is his desire to espouse conservative Republican views, but as someone who spent years working for Colbert and probably considers himself a liberal he can't fully admit that to himself or the entire game collapses. Same with his dancing around the topics of trans rights and his strange COVID beliefs - he doesn't want to fully articulate what he is trying to say. That would ruin things and make him realize he's just mouthing more of the same right-wing apologia as Joe Rogan and Dave Chappelle. Say what one will about the awful Zaslav and his sweater vests but at least he seems to know who he is. Licht is willfully clueless. And there were many valid reasons to fire Don Lemon, but being one of few prominent and outspoken gay and Black voices in media who could speak to what Trump and his kind are actually doing to people like him on-camera was not one of them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy