Jump to content

Article: Soaps Lose Their Ratings Luster


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Soaps lose their ratings luster

By Jonathan Berr, Bloomberg News, May 6, 2005, Posted in the Boston Globe

When the new television season's ratings for daytime soap operas landed, CBS research director David Poltrack was so dismayed that he asked the survey company to double-check its data.

Nielsen Media Research had found that in the first three months of the season that began in September, CBS, ABC, and NBC network soaps lost 18 percent of their female viewers ages 18 to 34, another blow to broadcasters reeling from the rise of cable and satellite services.

''Soap-opera ratings don't usually change that dramatically," Poltrack says. ''They're usually fairly stable."

Nielsen's numbers not only checked out, they underlined a new reality about US daytime TV: Soap operas, once cash cows for the networks, are fading in popularity.

More women are turning to cable channels, tuning in to talk shows such as Oprah or entering the workforce. Ad revenue for soaps fell an average of 5.3 percent a year from 2000 to 2004, while that of prime-time TV rose an average of 3 percent, according to estimates by London-based TNS Media Intelligence.

Poltrack, 59, and other TV executives are concerned. Daytime dramas, which average about 23 million viewers daily, generated about $1.2 billion in ad sales last year. Evening prime time generated about $13 billion in sales.

Procter & Gamble Co., which is so keen to reach consumers in the daytime TV market that it owns two shows -- ''Guiding Light," the longest-running program in broadcast history, and ATWT -- is trying to reverse the decline in viewership.

P&G hired a New York-based agency, the Masterson Group, to create an advertising campaign for its shows for the first time, says Mary Alice Dwyer-Dobbin, who oversees production of the two soap operas for P&G.

''We intend to put some money behind this," Dwyer-Dobbin says, declining to be more specific. ''We don't know what it's going to take yet."

Daytime soap viewership has also dropped for all the networks this season in the wider group of women ages 18 to 49, Nielsen says. So far this year, ABC's ''All My Children" is the only one of network TV's nine soap operas whose ratings have gained.

Nielsen concluded that much of the ratings decline came from women watching other types of programs, with additional reasons being the growing use of technologies such as DVDs.

Fans began drifting away from soap operas during the nine-month murder trial of O.J. Simpson in 1995, when the networks interrupted their shows to cover the case, says Michael Bruno, a manager for soap actors.

Fewer women are at home to watch, further chipping away at ratings. Women accounted for 46.4 percent of the US workforce in 2004, up from 42.5 percent in 1980, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Then there's Oprah. Ratings for her show were the highest in the February ''sweeps" -- a period when local stations set advertising rates -- since 1997. She attracts about nearly 10 million viewers daily, the highest of any show during the day.

The top-rated soap, CBS's ''The Young And The Restless," is watched on average by 4.7 million people, according to Nielsen.

Soap producers are trying to keep down costs.

Actress Eileen Fulton, 71, who has appeared on CBS's ''As the World Turns" since 1960, does about three shows a month now, down from eight two years ago. ''They are cutting back on everything," says Fulton. ''They're trying to save the show."

Bruno says viewers are seeing fewer ''grand parties" on the shows. ''You will see more intimate scenes with just one or two or three people," he says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I read that a year or so ago.

You can tell it's dated lol

AMC is now down vs last year in 18-49

Y&R averaged 5.6 million viewers for this past season up almost a million viewers from the date of this article :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy