Jump to content

San Diego to ban Wal-Mart Supercenters


Scotty

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think this whole issue got spoofed last night on "Family Guy" :lol:

Anyways....My rural town had one of the VERY few non-supercenter Wal-Mart's. It was a small little store, no grocery department, plenty of good parking.

Now, we have a supercenter...but it's not open 24 hours and it's not as big as a regular supercenter. But once you step through the doors, total chaos!! IMHO, one of the biggest mistakes this rural little "little town with a big heart" could have made. *disgruntled look*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, seeing as though I live near the heart of Wal-Mart country, I feel like it's my right to defend.

To me, Wal-Mart represents a place where anyone can get anything at almost any time. Food, Auto Parts, Electronics, etc.

And it's also a place where anyone and EVERYONE feels welcomed, not like the cold, distant, Botox-ed DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES nightmare that is Target.

Yes, they pay their employees [!@#$%^&*]. Yes, there are ALWAYS people there. But these are things we know about Wal-Mart from Day One. But you don't HAVE to work there. YOU made the choice to do that. And because a lot of people are there during rush hour running amok does not make it trashy. The same could be said for people at sporting events, restaraunts, and even at other stores.

It's your right to shop somewhere else. It's the city of San Diego's right to refuse to have Wal-Mart in their city. But, PLEASE, don't generalize EVERYONE that shop at Wal-Mart(and not referring to one specific person, but that is the stigma that is always attached to people who shop there). That is your biggest mistake. I've met auto mechanics at Wal-Mart who probably have more intelligence and class than the Yankees saying that we're "trashy" for shopping there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't have a problem with people who work at Walmart nor do I have a problem with people who shop there (although it's a bit sad that some people either feel like that's their only store choice or are ignorant in or freely choose to support such a horrible multi-corporation). The same goes for any other similar chain like K-Mart, the HBC stores (now that most of it's owned by an American), McDonald's, etc.

Yeah, it's convenient..just like fast-food and it's one of the many tactics being used to get as many people to shop there.

Again, another tactic to sell to as many people as possible. It's funny..I recently watched a film called "McLibel" and in it, Eric Schlosser (the guy who wrote "Fast-food Nation") explains how fast-food restaurants target children and act all homey to attract people to eat there. And it works.

Did we really know all that info about Wal-Mart? I know as a kid, I loved the place and it was until I learned more from the media and in school about its practices that I realize how bad it really was (and still is). No, we don't have to work there but why should such poor working conditions locally and abroad even be allowed in the first place? :angry: A lot of Walmart's clothes are made by children in the Third World, did you know that? So it's not just the expensive stuff like Adidas and the Gap that exploits workers from the Third World. The people who shop there aren't trashy but the company's practices in almost every area (labour, the environment, pruduction, etc.) are. <_<

I suggest checking out Wake-Up Wal-Mart. On the Facts list are several points I've already made about how Wal-Mart hurts local business and how that cycle of poverty occurs when employees get low wages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm proud of San Diego.... I look forward to the day where Wal-Mart finally comes crashing down. I actually work for a competing chain and they've been a huge problem for us. I love my company; they treat the employees very well and we don't need to unionize. Wal-Mart, however, does not, and someday will be unionized. And then its troubles will start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But WHY is that sad? What makes Wal-Mart more evil than every other coprporation that have basically done the same thing that Wal-Mart has been doing. K-Mart, Walgreens, even Target have all tried to do the same thing Wal-Mart has in terms of expanding into things beyond "the department store." It just so happens that Wal-Mart was more successful at doing that.

Well if people LIKE fast food(even though it is harmful for them in the long run), why should the businesses be held accountable for people's ignorance or convenience?

I dunno about everyone else, but no matter where I go to buy groceries or eat a low-price meal, I want to be able to feel like being there without feeling like people want me to leave. So I don't get why this is bad. As far as fast food, everyone knows that if you eat too much of it, you're gonna gain weight. That is a given.

It's been widely known for awhile now that Wal-Mart is not a job to raise a family on. Everyone around here knows that. And if they try and fail, then that's when they get another job. It's that simple.

I knew stuff at Wal-Mart was made by children in sweatshops. HEL-LO...Kathie Lee Gifford and her shitty Wal-Mart Clothes anyone?!

Well, until the government steps in, it's always gonna be like that. Don't mean to sound like such a Conservative, but it doesn't matter HOW the goods got in the their packaging. It just matters how much they cost. People in sweatshops making the goods I buy are the LEAST of my concerns.

I know Wal-Mart puts mom and pop stores out of business. I know the crime rate increases when a town that never has a Wal-Mart gets one. I know that people who work at Wal-Mart never get a raise.

But, again, those are all personal choices. The mom and pop store should mark their prices down a little lower, and offer more attractive features. Also, again, people know how badly Wal-Mart sucks. Either get a job that pays just as much or more with less stress or get a second job.

I thought Wal-Mart forces their employees to sign something upon hire that clearly states they cannot be in unions. Or maybe that is another company.

Adn Wal-Mart ain't going nowhere. Can't stop a speeding train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reason why you always see those psycho women at Target is because that's who they cater to. I worked in the clothing depts. there, and half of them were exclusively for women (ready-to-wear, juniors, maternity, plus-size, well-over half of shoes, lingerie, jewelry, accessories, hosiery). The rest were for men, girls, boys, and babies.

I would see women rack up $500-700 buying crap at Target. It was ridiculous. This one woman spent over $1,000 on X-mas gifts, and I told her about opening a Target card b/c...honestly, as much as those cards are crap and just put people in more debt, she would have been able to save $100. And she said no. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, Wal-Mart is definitely not the only evil corporation out there but I think it's sad that people feel like they can only support those greedy corporations simply because they're the most accessible and provide the cheapest products.

People are definitely responsible for their actions and unfortunately, we live in a society where we like to live in ignorance and think about the consequences when they actually happen rather than right now. That said, I think the government has a HUGE part to play in promoting healthy living, good business practices, good working conditions, etc. Why the hell should we leave everything in the hands of those who have the money??? :angry: When multi-corporations are paying people like crap and mistreating their workers and the environment, they SHOULD be held accountable.

Well, yeah, of course but when you look past all that fluff and think about all the [!@#$%^&*] that had to take place to make that business successful..I'd feel a little unsettled. :blink:

Yeah, and everyone knows if you pull the trigger, you might kill someone. Should we allow guns in schools, then???

Again, why the hell do we have to accept that??? Why do we have to naturalize such crap treatment of people??? :angry: So maybe you don't have a family to raise but you're single and have to pay the rent or you're a high school kid. What makes it more acceptable to treat those people like crap? None that I can think of.

And you're okay with that? These aren't just children working...they're kids who aren't able to go to school and who sometimes have to take their work outside because they're forced to finish the quota and yet they're still heavily underpaid..nevermind the fact that they're families are depending on their incomes for financial support.

Yeah, the gov't does need to step in but unfortunately, most gov'ts have a tendency to be corrupt and feel like multi-billion dollar corporations should take priority over everyday citizens. So while I said the gov't has a huge part to play, I think everyone has a responsibility..including the citizens themselves. Like you said, people have choice and if enough people actually stopped supporting these corporations, something might actually happen.

No comment.

To expect a local business to mark their prices down like Wal-Mart and K-Mart is naive. Like I said before, they don't have the millions to be able to mark their prices low enough and still gain a profit. They also don't get as much promotion as those big corporations.

And again, why are these state of affairs our only choices??? Why does our society feel like this is the only way to live and that nothing else can be done to change the system??

I've been studying globalization for 2 years and your arguments are exactly what that process is all about. It gives the idea that all those things that I'm pretty sure people in general look down on are natural and inevitable. But they aren't. And the kind of apathy and blind acceptance that you seem to have about the whole thing is quite disturbing. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
OMG I HATE THAT. I close at nights and have to catch the last bus at 11:15. We close at 11 and some idiot will come in. Pisses me off.

I had to do that when I worked at Petro Canada. Although, we earned prizes when we did that. We'd get points and save those points for some nice prizes. But we had to sell 12 pack of waters one month and my boss used to get pissed at me cause I wasn't selling enough. I'd snap right back at her because I worked graveyards and nobody is going to come in at 3 am to buy a 12 pack of water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

SpiritualJunkie, obviously we are not going to agree, nor change each other's minds on the issue.

The only think I ask is to not be judge for going into Wal-Mart JUST because they have lower prices, because of the convenience, and because they have almost everything I need in their one store. Most people don't care how their goods get into the stores. It's a sad reality, but it IS a reality nonetheless. And why should the poor take YOUR version of the high-road, just because you deem Wal-Mart an "eeevil corporation?"

The Walton family has earned every single dime of their Wal-Mart shares. Yeah, they've stepped on the little guy's toes, but as long as they provide a low-price, easy service, they're not gonna stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Anita vs. Leslie, bring it!
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy