Jump to content

The "foreign soaps" topic


Huntress

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yeah, there is although it's about the same standard as the American soap press. All hype and things taken out of context.

I've been watching EE fairly regularly recently which is strange seeing as I'm more of a Corrie man. Kevin's just married Denise after she found out on their wedding day about sleeping with Shirley and decided to forgive him. Shirley got into a huge scrap with Pat in the street and they were arrested. Stella is still abusing Ben but has managed to get an engagement ring out of Phil. Dot's taken in a baby after Jim reported his Polish mother to immigration. She's making it out that he's her grandson and nobody is any the wiser but she can't cope with the strain of looking after a baby. As for the triangle, it's still very much plodding on without much movement. Stacey and Max are still doing it at every opportunity and Stacey's now worming her way into a friendship with Tanya, manipulating her to do things that Max wouldn't necessarily agree with e.g. business decisions.

There are a couple of other daft subplots about Mickey being a gigolo and that daughter of Denise's having a crush on Gus but that's the main thrust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 620
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Thanks, James.

I think that last time I checked the credits Brigie de Courcy was replaced with Dominic Treadwell-Collins. I wonder what changes will this bring. I'm not really a fan of the current storylines... I'm just gonna wait and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem that EE has at the moment which it's never been able to master is pacing stories over 4 episodes a week. I mean I like the Max/Tanya/Stacey story in theory but it has been dragging on for so long now and from what's been in the papers, it will still be going well into the summer. The payoff will be good when Tanya finds out but I think that's only because at the moment it seems so far off as to be unimaginable.

As for the other stories, I like Mad May but the Stella stuff is a letdown. As with everything else, it's just become quite repetitive to keep filling airtime.

According to today's papers, the BBC has pulled out. Whether that's true or not remains to be seen but they were offering £70, 000 per episode compared to ITV's £104, 000. What is undeniable is that in Fremantle's greed, they will most likely kill the show. It only survives in Australia because of the UK stability. ITV will botch it up as it does with most things and dump it after a few years. Five is a more tenable solution and I hope they win out the bidding war (which seems likely as ITV is antsy over some of the contract clauses such as VOD rights etc). They've been airing Home and Away since 2001 and do a pretty good job with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I kind of started hating that Power of Three — Tanya, May and Jane (especially her, she's become such a... after Grant left).

Yes, maybe Max/Tanya/Stacey is the best of the lot, and Stella’s story is so creepy and horrible, but you could just tell it was going that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I only started watching a couple of months ago so missed all of the Grant debacle but I quite like Tanya, May and Jane. :lol: I think it stems from the fact that the show has never really done female friendships particularly well and it also ties their stories together in a less artificial way.

Stella..meh. I can't really get past the fact that the whole story is predicated on Phil and Peggy being both stupid and out of character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess it can be seen in that way. I'm just not sure they even like each other. I mean Tanya is certainly not in Jane's league, and May has become a psychopath, she lost all of the qualities she shoul have been standing for (being an example of an honest and successful woman). And her voice when she yells is just so annoying...

As always...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: You're totally right. Last night my flatmate and I were referring to them as "the coven". It's what I've come to expect of EE these days. Plot contrivance and campy theatrics but it's enough to entertain me because I've not been invested in the show for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Coven! That's the word I was searching for!! :lol:  It has really been a while since EE was any good, apart from tiny moments in some scripts.

Here's what Paul Abbott said about what should be done with EastEnders:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That quote from Paul Abbott is old, isn't it? That was back during the mess with Den's return and a few other big disasters.

What I see as the biggest problem now is most of the characters they've been showing front burner all the time are fairly new. It's too much seeing all the new people and anyone who has been on for any length of time, except Pat, become totally back burnered. The one thing they are doing right is keeping Pat right in the middle of things.

Sounds like Dot is back in action but I haven't seen her for a long time. Since Sonia & Martin left to the point I'm at about 5 weeks back she's just gone.

I can't stand the Max/Stacey mess.

Most everything else is just ok. It's not as bad as the show was a couple of years ago but nowhere near as good as it's been at other times.

But it's still way better than anything that's been on in the US soap scene for years and years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And I forgot to add that I’m interested in seeing what happens with Squiggle’s and Darren’s on-line fraud.

Yes, Abbott’s comment is old. And the problem with characters is something another Corrie script editor mentioned in an interview — EE has these great characters, but they burn them so quickly.

At any other given time, I would completely agree with your comment about US soaps, but the things I’m seeing on EE nowadays are pretty horrible. Nothing compelling.

P. S. Plus, that Carly/Deano/Shirly feuds and stuff is really annoying. The whole of the teen drama is pure pesimism and darkness, not a light and entertaining story in sight...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't say EE is great at the moment but it's a masterpiece compared to that awful mess it was about 2 or 3 years ago. It was getting worse and worse then they brought in a new producer from Holby City who overnight turned it so much worse than it had ever been before. It was nasty until they removed this woman. She was obsessed with dark lighting which made all the sets look tacky & cheap. But it was the awful stories and the nastiness of the characters that really stunk. It was better than anything on American soaps even at rock bottom worst but it was still awful.

At the moment the American shows are all pretty bad other than some of CBS and Days.

But I do wish I could get Corrie & the Aussie soaps.

I am looking forward to Hollyoaks on BBC America. Hopefully they'll bring Hollyoaks: In the City back. I loved what little I saw of that.

Really, this is the sort of thing SoapNet ought to be looking into instead of dreadful reality garbage and spinoffs of the currently awful General Hospital from the same messed up team who wrecked and demolished the show in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Recent Posts

    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy