Jump to content

Big Brother 7: Official Discussion Thread (NO Spoilers)


R!ck

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Honestly, I'm glad the feeds aren't free. I would probably have to quit my job, drop out of summer school, and put everything else on hold so that I could watch the feeds non-stop. If they were free, I wouldn't want to miss a second of action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just figured it might be the case, as he said it on his way out to his houseguests "I'll be back in two weeks!"....and then to Julie Chen - he said something about fighting hard in the challenge and will be getting back in there and going to sequester, etc etc (or something to that effect)...

And I totally agree with his hair - horrrrrrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

However, he hasn't been annoying on Housecalls....yet.

Here are some quotes from Alison.

"ANYWAYS- Jase called me this morning…. I’m sad to see him gone. I liked him on TV…and now… all that there is to watch is DR WILL and Boogie. The rest need a serious injection of personality."

"OH- and I want to give props when props are due. Janelle got it! Shes HOH again.. the girl is good! But I still want her evicted. hahah"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No evicted HG is coming back. Alison is home and posting on her blog. Nakomis is home but incommunicodo. Jase is home too and has done all the press, etc. No one's coming back, at least from the first few evicted before sequester.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I too hope they dropped the whole inviction idea. If it were to take place, I don't think they'd bring back one of the top 20 who didn't make it into the house because I don't think those individuals have been sequestered. Bunky is one example of this since he is with Gretchen on Housecalls. BB clearly wouldn't let potential houseguests out in the open, free to watch the show and live feeds, and then bring them back in the house. Or, would they? :unsure: That would be too cool!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Dani seems the type that blew through her trust fund before she hit 30.. so she probably doesn't have any liquid assets... and neither she nor Pamela seem like they're money smart. Vanessa seems to be into experimenting.   I think she and Doug both have addictions (his to gambling and her to the thrill of sex and/or getting caught). The breakdown for the episode was ok, but some of the lines were a bit off (except during the Anita scenes and the Smitty/Bill scenes)
    • OMG!!!! ONE OF ANITA'S BANDMATE IS COMMMMMMMMINNNGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!    
    • I'll add that I did think the Bill/Smitty scenes were the best--played really well.
    • I am loving that Anita's story is off and running. And it's a slow burn.   OOoooo another Bill/Smitty scene. But I'm loving that the seed that Bill planted has really been growing over yesterday and now today's episode. Cuz Smitty going to Nicole...uh oh now.    Kat continues to be smart and love it. But hopefully she realizes she's getting played by Silk Press Sheila.    And probably in the minority, but I do like the June storyline so far. And it has not stalled really at all. It feels organic in terms of pacing.    
    • Well I'm always here for people singing my song when it comes to the New/Old writers. lol.  Same.   Also same.  
    • I got the feeling she's always been slightly too flirty with him?  But this brings up a comment I've had whenever I see Vanessa with these weird men (or was this one we've seen before) who she has role play sex hijinks with...  They always just come off as plain bizarre.  This guy followed her in the middle of the day to a cafe?  The dialogue always seems like they want to push the boundaries too with what they can say but then just comes off as incredibly weird (something about what she did with her foot?) And oh yes, let's go to an underground/backroom casino to try to raise money for our new upstart agency? I hate to say it, and I didn't catch the writers for this episode, but I felt this was another episode like some past ones where the dialogue throughout sounded off and not natural--and too filled with references and metaphors that maybe looked nice on paper but not so much when people say them. (Oh and random--why cast a day actor as a surgeon for a tiny scene and then reveal in the next hospital scene that he can't do it because of a family emergency?  Just... kinda weird.)
    • Oh, lord. I was hoping that Doug would be in June's surgery for a while. Now I'm afraid that she's going to run right into Dani and Pamela.    
    • The shirtless scenes increased under Nicholson as EP with Quinn, Hogan etc. They had focused on Steve Kendall under Joanna Lee in 1983 but not much bare skin on SFT overall.  Louanne was a terrible recast. And don't get me started on Pam Long's horrible final six months as head writer with the Ireland plot and the convoluted Judge Henderson plot. I watched it daily until the end and cannot summarize either plot.  
    • Running in late and a bit out of order cuz yesterday was a mess but since I'm here...   So far I am liking that there are a lot of hotties and bubbles on display. lol.   A lot of plot is moving and/or being touched on. Right down to ANOTHER of Vanessa's many men. He was cute and bubbled, too.    So far, I'm not feeling SilkPress vs NuTed. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy