Jump to content

The CW Schedule - Not timeslots yet, but entire lineup announced!


Chris B

Recommended Posts

  • Members

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - The CW network will look like the sum of its parts when the successor of the soon-to-be-defunct UPN and WB launches in the fall with a mix of holdovers and just two new offerings.

UPN's "Veronica Mars" and the WB's "One Tree Hill" made the cut at the CW, but the WB's family drama "Everwood" did not.

CW's pickups, in addition to new drama "Runaway" and "Girlfriends" spinoff "The Game," include the soap "Palm Springs," which was given a midseason order Tuesday.

Also moving to the new network are UPN comedies "Girlfriends," "Everybody Hates Chris" and "All of Us," and WB dramas "Smallville," "Supernatural" and "Gilmore Girls," with veteran "7th Heaven" expected to join the group pending the completion of new deals with the cast.

On the reality side, UPN's hit "America's Next Top Model" and WB's "Beauty and the Geek" are rumored for a possible pairing on the schedule, with Wednesday considered a logical place.

"Chris," brainchild of comedian Chris Rock; "All of Us," from another famous actor, Will Smith; "Girlfriends," from Kelsey Grammer's production company; and "The Game" could form a Monday comedy block that has been a staple on UPN.

Also looking compatible are "Gilmore Girls" and "Veronica Mars," and "7th Heaven" and "Runaway."

"Runaway" stars Donnie Wahlberg as a father who goes on the run with his family after he is wrongly convicted of murder. "The Game" revolves around women in the lives of professional football players. "Palm Springs," from "Dawson's Creek" creator Kevin Williamson, is an ensemble soap set in the California desert city.

----------------------------------

I must say they've put up a VERY strong lineup and I wish them well with it! Now I'm incredibly worried that Veronica Mars won't gain any new viewers and will get their order cut to 13. Hope that happens to OTH though! :P

All of the new shows look like they have a shot of being hits! I'm glad they went with developing a few really strong pilots, instead of picking things like Ultra and Aquaman just because of the buzz. Can't wait until the network reveals the timeslots and such so we will know where everything is sitting. I also am interested in hearing what they plan on doing to 7th Heaven. If it stays the way it is it will lose a lot of money for the network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Thanks for posting this, and I agree they picked some winners--most notaby, "Chris," "Girlfriends," "Heaven," and "Mars." But leaving out "Reba" and "Everwood" are huge mistakes! But it's good news for "One Tree Hill" fans who ached for resolution after that cliffhanger. I still don't see why The CW had to develop ANY programming when it all the hit UPN and WB shows could have padded the whole lineup. It would have been the fair thing to do, weeding out the duds by midseason. Then everyone's happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand them wanting to launch the network with some new shows. It is a good way to bring in a new audience and give your network some extra promo. Even the #1 networks will add new shows because it's never good to get complacent. Just look at CBS, don't be surprised if it sees a decline with Grey's Anatomy against CSI.

Launching shows in the midseason is always a bigger risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm confused about the comedies. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Half and Half higher rated than All of Us?

UGH.

I wish the CW well and look forward to seeing some of my favorites again (Gilmore Girls, Smallville, etc.)

Sucks they cancelled Reba. HUGE mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Everwood had a good life. It was a steady (somewhat) performer for The WB. It lost a lot of it's critical praise towards the end. I think moving it and preempting it a lot this past year is what drove the ratings down. Had it had higher ratings, I think we would be seeing that, not One Tree Hill, back.

Sorry to OTH fans... I didn't watch either show, so ... I probably will watch OTH and see how it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No Half and Half...but All of Us? Whatever.

Only watching for ANTM and maybe EHC.

Girlfriends, All of Us and The Game don't even interest me a tad bit.

OTH, Veronica Mars and 7th Heaven are just...not me.

Kevin Williamson...can't wait to see what his thing turns out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Not to ramble too far off topic but it happens a lot with comics too, especially only wanting to keep cheap talent around and pushing out creative voices. There are some patches where creatives can go to start their own worlds...wish that was true with soaps, but who knows, maybe it can happen someday. I never thought we'd get a new soap this year.
    • Very true & also at least in the case of stand-out HWs, it is fraught with exhaustion & burnout.
    • Plus we are never going to have a Shonda Rhimes, a Dick Wolf, or a Chuck Lorre of daytime -- a single brilliant person who could come in and change the genre -- because Shonda, Dick, or Chuck would only be able to work on one soap opera at a time, not three or four at the same time as they do in primetime.  As long as TPTB insist on the 60-minute format, we will never have another super influential individual like Phillips, Nixon, or Bell.  They simply would never have time to do more than one soap opera at a time and that would stifle their influence overall. Thanks. So maybe this is happening to some degree in other entertainment genres.  I don't keep up with the particular franchises you mentioned, so I was unaware.  I appreciate your perspective.
    • I think it's become more common in other genres in recent decades, as the industry as a whole has collapsed - these are complaints that have been made about creative talents in the MCU, Star Wars, Doctor Who, etc.  The MCU is in that place now as they burnt so much goodwill that even when their new movie got strong reviews, the audience didn't show up - similar to how AW got some praise for their 89-93 material compared to some of the barren years beforehand, but viewers just weren't coming back.  (I know they did return, somewhat, in the JFP run, but not enough to make up for the big budget she used)
    • I mean I really hope so. Still kinda amazed though that it would get by Standards & Practices. A pair that was talked about that I could see it was Jacob Young & that guy who kept changing what name he went by Someone Martines at least part of the time, but at any rate Jacob was playing Lucky & this other guy was playing Nikolas.
    • Excellent explication. That doing it in these two examples, is not like doing it in other similar genres or franchises, so one could easily postulate that the people who hire do not generally consider "newbies" but instead insist upon experienced people, which leads to rehiring rather than hiring from "outside" which is what your closed system is all about.  When you think about it how many people can you name who did soaps who came from outside? I can only think of 3 HWs : Pete Lemay, Hogan Sheffer & Michael Malone. For EPs only 2: Wendy Riche & Linda Gottlieb    
    • I saw some people mentioning this and I was curious too - did Bo already know Caroline was dead? Maybe they decided it was too much for Bo to process losing Caroline along with Victor and Doug.
    • @asafi Thanks for sharing. A nice milestone. I'm not sure if she is referring to just DAYS, as otherwise she isn't alone (Ken Barlow and Rita Fairclough on Corrie are two others).

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Someone making that must have had a laugh. I have to admit I never saw any chemistry between them. 
    • That'a an interesting comparison, and might be a parallel.  But i also know too little about sports  to really comment on it's accuracy.  It might have something to do with a "closed" system, and the consuming nature of producing or writing a daytime drama and coaching.  Both in football and daytime, those factors make it hard for new talent to break into the system.  And even a very talented coach or daytime writer or executive producer can only do one team (or one show) at a time, limiting that person's impact on the entire system.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy